The Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques - Tập 28 Số 3 - Trang 153-158 - 2018
Rongzan Zhang1, Quan Lu1, Younong Wu1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Fenghua People's Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China

Tóm tắt

Introduction: Midazolam and propofol are both used for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of midazolam and propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of midazolam versus propofol on sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy are included. Two investigators have independently searched for articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model. Results: Five randomized controlled trials involving 552 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with midazolam sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy, propofol sedation results in higher endoscopist satisfaction scores during gastrointestinal endoscopy than midazolam [standard mean difference (Std. MD)=−0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI)=−1.05 to −0.37; P<0.0001), but the comparison shows no remarkable influence on patient satisfaction scores between midazolam and propofol (Std. MD=−0.34; 95% CI=−0.88 to 0.20; P=0.21), procedure time (Std. MD=0.14; 95% CI=−0.13 to 0.42; P=0.31), hypoxia [risk ratio (RR)=0.86; 95% CI=0.53-1.38; P=0.53), and bradycardia (RR=1.05; 95% CI=0.54-2.06; P=0.89). In addition, propofol shows higher incidence of hypotension than midazolam (RR=0.58; 95% CI=0.34-0.99; P=0.04). Conclusions: When compared with midazolam sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy, propofol sedation results in higher endoscopist satisfaction scores, but may increase the incidence of hypotension.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Tetzlaff, 2016, Preprocedural assessment for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy, Gastroint Endosc Clin N Am, 26, 433, 10.1016/j.giec.2016.02.001

Eskander, 2016, Ketamine sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy in children, Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 4, 392, 10.3889/oamjms.2016.085

Chung, 2016, Sedation and monitoring in the pediatric patient during gastrointestinal endoscopy, Gastroint Endosc Clin N Am, 26, 507, 10.1016/j.giec.2016.02.004

Vargo, 2016, Sedation and monitoring in gastrointestinal endoscopy, Gastroint Endosc Clin N Am, 26, xv, 10.1016/j.giec.2016.04.002

Bell, 2006, Preparation, premedication, and surveillance, Endoscopy, 38, 105, 10.1055/s-2005-921205

Da, 2016, Training and competency in sedation practice in gastrointestinal endoscopy, Gastroint Endosc Clin N Am, 26, 443, 10.1016/j.giec.2016.02.002

Uzman, 2016, A comparison of propofol and midazolam/meperidine sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 11, 178

Cohen, 2006, Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey, Am J Gastroenterol, 101, 967, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00500.x

Froehlich, 2006, Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational Study (EPAGE), Endoscopy, 38, 461, 10.1055/s-2006-925368

Daneshmend, 1991, Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey, Gut, 32, 12, 10.1136/gut.32.1.12

Conway, 2016, Midazolam for sedation before procedures, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 20, CD009491

Servin, 1990, Pharmacokinetics of propofol infusions in patients with cirrhosis, Br J Anaesth, 65, 177, 10.1093/bja/65.2.177

Park, 2016, Outcomes of propofol sedation during emergency endoscopy performed for upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Dig Dis Sci, 61, 825, 10.1007/s10620-015-3942-z

Sipe, 2002, Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists, Gastrointest Endosc, 55, 815, 10.1067/mge.2002.124636

Dewitt, 2008, Nurse-administered propofol sedation compared with midazolam and meperidine for EUS: a prospective, randomized trial, Gastrointest Endosc, 68, 499, 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.092

Fanti, 2015, Target controlled infusion for non-anaesthesiologist propofol sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: the first double blind randomized controlled trial, Dig Liver Dis, 47, 566, 10.1016/j.dld.2015.03.003

Ominami, 2018, Comparison of propofol with midazolam in endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial, J Gastroenterol, 53, 397, 10.1007/s00535-017-1358-6

Moher, 2009, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, BMJ, 339, b2535, 10.1136/bmj.b2535

Jadad, 1996, Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?, Control Clin Trials, 17, 1, 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4

Kjaergard, 2001, Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses, Ann Inter Med, 135, 982, 10.7326/0003-4819-135-11-200112040-00010

Lera dos Santos, 2013, Deep sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl regimens, World J Gastroenterol, 19, 3439, 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3439

Meining, 2007, The effect of sedation on the quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: an investigator-blinded, randomized study comparing propofol with midazolam, Endoscopy, 39, 345, 10.1055/s-2006-945195

Carlsson, 1995, Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam, Endoscopy, 27, 240, 10.1055/s-2007-1005678

Kashiwagi, 2016, Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of propofol sedation by anesthesiologists and gastroenterologist-led teams using computer-assisted personalized sedation during upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, Dig Endosc, 28, 657, 10.1111/den.12678

VanNatta, 2006, Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with opioids and/or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy, Am J Gastroenterol, 101, 2209, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00760.x

Hsieh, 2009, Propofol alone versus propofol in combination with meperidine for sedation during colonoscopy, J Clin Gastroenterol, 43, 753, 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181862a8c

Tohda, 2006, Propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures: safe and effective administration by registered nurses supervised by endoscopists, Endoscopy, 38, 360, 10.1055/s-2005-921192

Leslie, 2016, Survey of anaesthetists’ practice of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy, Anaesth Intensive Care, 44, 491, 10.1177/0310057X1604400409

Levitzky, 2012, Moderate sedation for elective upper endoscopy with balanced propofol versus fentanyl and midazolam alone: a randomized clinical trial, Endoscopy, 44, 13, 10.1055/s-0031-1291421

Seifert, 2000, Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 14, 1207, 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00787.x

Hsu, 2013, Low effect-site concentration of propofol target-controlled infusion reduces the risk of hypotension during endoscopy in a Taiwanese population, J Dig Dis, 14, 147, 10.1111/1751-2980.12020

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Tập 28 Số 3

153-158

Thông tin tác giả