The Blockchain as a Narrative Technology: Investigating the Social Ontology and Normative Configurations of Cryptocurrencies

Philosophy & Technology - Tập 31 Số 1 - Trang 103-130 - 2018
Wessel Reijers1, Mark Coeckelbergh2
1ADAPT Centre, School of Computing, Dublin City University, Henry Grattan Building, Dublin 9, Ireland
2Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7 (NIG), 1010, Vienna, Austria

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agre, P. E. (2003). Peer-to-Peer and the Promise of Internet Equality. Communications of the ACM, 46(2), 39–42.

Akrich, M. (1992). The De-scription of Technical Objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/ Building society. Camebridge: MIT Press.

Allison, I. (2015). Decentralised Government Project Bitnation Offers Refugees Blockchain IDs and Bitcoin Debit Cards. International Business Times. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/decentralised-government-project-bitnation-offers-refugees-blockchain-ids-bitcoin-debit-cards-1526547 . Accessed 30 Oct 2015.

Borisenkova, A. (2010). Narrative Refiguration of Social Events: Paul Ricoeur’s Contribution to Rethinking the Social. Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies, 1(1), 87–98. doi: 10.5195/errs.2010.37

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Coeckelbergh, M. (2015a). Money as Medium and Tool: Reading Simmel as a Philosopher of Technology to Understand Contemporary Financial ICTs and Media. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 19(3), 358–380. doi: 10.5840/techne2015121039

Coeckelbergh, M. (2015b). Money Machines: Electronic Financial Technologies, Distancing, and Responsibility in Global Finance. Farnham: Ashgate.

Coeckelbergh, M., & Reijers, W. (2016). Narrative Technologies: a philosophical investigation of the narrative capacities of technologies. Human Studies, 1(1), 325–346. doi: 10.1007/s10746-016-9383-7

Cameron, A. (2015). Money’s Unholy Trinity: Devil, Trickster, Fool. Culture and Organization, 22(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1080/14759551.2015.1035721 .

Carr, D. (1986). Narrative and the real world. History and Theory. 25(2), 117-131. doi: 10.2307/369249

Chaum, D. (1985). Security without Identification: Transaction Systems to Make Big Brother Obsolete. Communications of the ACM, 28(10), 1030–44. doi: 10.1145/4372.4373 .

Clegg, A. G. (2014). Could Bitcoin Be a Financial Solution for Developing Economies? Birmingham: University of Birmingham, Marzec.

Czarniawsma, B. (1998). A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Dawson, P., & Buchanan, D. (2005). The way it really happened: Competing narratives in the political process of technological change. Human Relations, 58(7), 845–865. doi: 10.1177/0018726705057807

D-Cent. (2015). Tools for Democratic Participation and Citizen Empowerment. D-Cent. http://dcentproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/publishable-summary-10-2015-for-web.pdf . Accessed 11 Dec 2015.

De Filippi, P. (2013). Bitcoin: a regulatory nightmare to a libertarian dream. Internet Policy Review, 3(2), 1-12. doi: 10.14763/2014.2.286

Decker, C., & Wattenhofer, R. (2014). Bitcoin Transaction Malleability and MtGox. In Computer Security-ESORICS 2014 (pp. 313–326). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-11212-1_18

DuPont, Q. (2014). The Politics of Cryptography: Bitcoin and The Ordering Machines. Journal of Peer Production, 1, 1–10.

Dupont, Q., & Maurer, B. (2015). Ledgers and Law in the Blockchain. Kings Review. June 23rd 2015. http://kingsreview.co.uk/magazine/blog/2015/06/23/ledgers-and-law-in-the-blockchain/

Edwards, P. N. (2004). Infrastructure and modernity: force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In T. Misa, P. Brey & A. Feenberg (Eds.), Modernity and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. http://doi.org/0262633108

Ethereum (2016). Decentralized Autonomous Organization. Ethereum: Start a democratic organization. https://www.ethereum.org/dao . Accessed 28 June 2016.

Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. New York: Routledge.

Feenberg, A. (2009). Peter-Paul Verbeek : Review of What Things Do. Human Studies, 32(2), 225–228. doi: 10.1007/s10746-009-9115-3

Folkinshteyn, D. (2015). A Tale of Twin Tech: Bitcoin and the Www. Journal of Strategic and International Studies, 10(2), 82–90.

Gerring, T. (2016) Building the decentralized web: how Ethereum could shard the web. Ethereum Blog. https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/08/18/building-decentralized-web/ . Accessed 28 June 2016.

Golumbia, D. (2015). Bitcoin as Politics: Distributed Right-Wing Extremism. In Moneylab Reader: An Intervention in Digital Economy (pp. 117–31). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.

Gotham, K. F., & Staples, W. G. (1996). Narrative Analysis and the New Historical Sociology. The Sociological Quarterly, 37(3), 481–501.

Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time (J. Stambaugh, trans.). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Garland Publishing.

Heidemann, C. (1999). On Some Difficulties Concerning John Searle’s Notion of an ‘Institutional Fact.’. Analyse & Kritik, 20, 143–58.

Hellwig, M. (2009). Systemic Risk in the Financial Sector: an Analysis of the Subprime Mortgage Financial Crisis. De Economist, 157(2), 129–207.

Hodder, I. (2014). The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-Term View. New Literary History, 45(1), 19–36. doi: 10.1353/nlh.2014.0005 .

Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and Technoscience. New York: Sunny Press.

Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, Technology and the Imaginations of Modernity. In S. Jasanoff & S. Kim (Eds.), Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (Vol. 1, pp. 1–49). doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Joerges, B. (1999). Do Politics Have Artefacts? Social Studies of Science, 29(3), 411–431.

Kaplan, D. M. (2006). Paul Ricoeur and the Philosophy of Technology. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy, 16(1/2), 42–56.

Karlstrøm, H. (2014). Do Libertarians Dream of Electric Coins? The Material Embeddedness of Bitcoin. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2013.870083 .

Kavanagh, D., & Miscione, G. (2015). Bitcoin and the Blockchain : A Coup D’état in Digital Heterotopia ? In Critical Management Studies Conference Proceedings. Leicester: Humanistic Management Network.

Kostakis, V., & Giotitsas, C. (2014). The (A)political Economy of Bitcoin. TripleC, 12(2), 431–440.

Lessig, L. (2006). CODE Version 2.0. CODE Version 2.0.. New York: Basic Books.

MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A study in moral theory (Third Ed.). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Malefijt, L. D. W. (2014). NLCoin (Bachelor Thesis). Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.

Mcreynolds, E., Lerner, A., Scott, W., Roesner, F., & Kohno, T. (2015). Cryptographic Currencies from a Tech-Policy Perspective : Policy Issues and Technical Directions (Financial Cryptography and Data Security: FC 2015 International Workshops, BITCOIN, WAHC, and Wearable, Vol. 8976). San Juan: Springer.

Meretoja, H. (2014). Narrative and Human Existence: Ontology, Epistemology, and Ethics. New Literary History, 45(1), 89–109. doi: 10.1353/nlh.2014.0001

Möser, M. (2013). Anonymity of Bitcoin Transactions: An Analysis of Mixing Services (Proceedings of Münster Bitcoin Conference, pp. 17–18).

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin : A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (White Paper). No publisher.

Naughton, J. (1998). A Brief History of the Future: The Origins of the Internet. London: Phoenix Paperback.

New York State Department of fincancial services. (2015). TITLE 23. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES CHAPTER I. REGULATIONS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES PART 200. VIRTUAL CURRENCIES. New York Codes, Rules and Regulations. New York. doi: 10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2 .

Ogunbadewa, A. (2014). The Virtues and Risks Inherent in the ‘Bitcoin’ Virtual Currency. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–50. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2425114 .

Philipps, L. (1996). Discursive deficits: A feminist perspective on the power of technical knowledge in fiscal law and policy. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 11(1), 141–176.

Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 221–232. doi: 10.1177/030631284014003004

Pryke, M., & Allen, J. (2000). Monetized time-space: derivatives – money’s ‘new imaginary’? Economy and Society, 29(2), 264–284.

Reutzel, B. (2016). The DAO Shows Blockchain Can’t Code Away Social Problems. Coindesk. http://www.coindesk.com/system-problems-social-issues-daos-structure/ . Accessed 28 June 2016.

Ricoeur, P. (1983). Time and Narrative - Volume 1. (K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Eds.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.

Ricoeur, P. (1985). Time and Narrative - Volume 2. (K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Eds.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.

Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and Narrative - Volume 3. (K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Eds.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.

Roio, D. J. (2013). Bitcoin, the End of the Taboo on Money. Dyne.org Digital Press, April 2013, 1–17. http://www.dyndy.net/2013/04/bitcoin-ends-the-taboo-on-money/ . Accessed 1 Dec 2015.

Samman, G. (2015). Blockchain Tech Is the ‘Biggest Opportunity’ for Banks to Stay Relevant, Says New Report. The Cointelegraph. http://cointelegraph.com/news/113805/blockchain-tech-is-the-biggest-opportunity-for-banks-to-stay-relevant . Accessed 21 June 2015.

Scott, B. (2014). Visions of a Techno-Leviathan: The Politics of the Bitcoin Blockchain. Retrieved from http://www.e-ir.info/2014/06/01/visions-of-a-techno-leviathan-the-politics-of-the-bitcoin-blockchain/ . Accessed 1 Dec 2015.

Scott, B. (2015). A Dark Knight Is Better than No Knight at All. Kings Review, March 24. http://kingsreview.co.uk/magazine/blog/2015/03/24/a-dark-knight-is-better-than-no-knight-at-all/ . Accessed 1 Dec 2015.

Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–457.

Searle, J. R. (2006). Social Ontology: Some Basic Principles. Anthropological Theory, 6(1), 51–71.

Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001 .

Shakespeare, W. (1623). As You like It (2005th ed.). San Diego: ICON Group International.

Simmel, G. (1900). The Philosophy of Money. New York: Routledge Classics, Edited by D. Frisby, 3rd ed., 1978.

Siren, A., & Hakamies-Blomqvist, L. (2005). Sense and sensibility. a narrative study of older women’s car driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(3), 213–228. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.008 .

Strawson, G. (2004). Against Narrativity. Ratio, 17(4), 428–452.

Takatsuki, Y. (2008). The Formation of an Efficient Market in Tokuawa, Japan. Graduate School of Economics-Yasuo Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo Discussion Paper Series F-143.

Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin is Changing Money, Business and the World. New York: Penguin Random House.

Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. The Review of Metaphysics, 25(1), 3–51.

Van Den Eede, Y. (2010). In Between Us: On the Transparency and Opacity of Technological Mediation. Foundations of Science, 16(2-3), 139–159. doi: 10.1007/s10699-010-9190-y

Van Rompay, B., Preneel, B., & Vandewalle, J. (1999). The Digital Timestamping Problem. In A. Barbe, E. C. van der Meulen, & P. Vanroose (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Symposium on Information Theory in the Benelux (Werkgemeenschap voor Informatie- en Communicatietheorie, pp. 71–78).

Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What Things Do; Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.

Vigna, P., & Casey, M. J. (2015). The Age of CryptoCurrency: How Bitcoin and Digital Money Are Challenging the Global Economic Order. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Williams-Grut, O. (2015). Santander Is Experimenting with Bitcoin and close to Investing in a Blockchain Startup. Business Insider UK. http://uk.businessinsider.com/santander-has-20-25-use-cases-for-bitcoins-blockchain-technology-everyday-banking-2015-6 . Accessed 12 Nov 2015.

Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136. doi: 10.2307/20024652

Wood, G. (2014). Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction Ledger - First Draft. (Yellow paper). Ethereum.