The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009–2015

Wess A. Cohen1, Lily R. Mundy2, Tiffany N.S. Ballard3, Anne Klassen4, Stefan J. Cano5, John Browne6, Andrea L. Pusic1
1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
2College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
3Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
4McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
5Modus Outcomes, Stotfold, UK
6Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Road, Cork, Ireland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Curtin, 2014, A reflection of outcomes research and its impact on the practice of hand surgery, J Hand Surg Eur vol, 39, 790, 10.1177/1753193414524138 Cano, 2009, The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons, Plast Reconstr Surg, 123, 98e, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819565c1 Cano, 2012, The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples, Plast Reconstr Surg, 129, 293, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aec6b Cordeiro, 2008, Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer, N. Engl J Med, 359, 1590, 10.1056/NEJMct0802899 Saulis, 2007, A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures, Plast Reconstr Surg, 119, 1669, 10.1097/01.prs.0000258827.21635.84 Alderman, 2007, Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcomes study, J Am Coll Surg, 204, 7, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.022 Liu, 2014, Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 146, 117, 10.1007/s10549-014-2981-z McCarthy, 2014, Chest and upper body morbidity following immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction, Ann Surg Oncol, 21, 107, 10.1245/s10434-013-3231-z Jeevan, 2014, Findings of a national comparative audit of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England, J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg JPRAS, 67, 1333, 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.022 Atisha, 2014, A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures, Ann Surg Oncol, 21, 10 Eltahir, 2014, Reply: quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported breast-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures, Plast Reconstr Surg, 133, 595e, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000041 Alderman, 2000, Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction, Plast Reconstr Surg, 106, 769, 10.1097/00006534-200009020-00003 Giacalone, 2002, Achieving symmetry in unilateral breast reconstruction: 17 years experience with 683 patients, Aesthet Plast Surg, 26, 299, 10.1007/s00266-002-2034-6 Hu, 2009, Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period, Plast Reconstr Surg, 124, 1, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab10b2 Spear, 2008, A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction, Plast Reconstr Surg, 122, 340, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d6009 Tonseth, 2008, Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap or expandable breast implant, J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg JPRAS, 61, 1188, 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.05.006 Yueh, 2010, Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques, Plast Reconstr Surg, 125, 1585, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb6351 Regulatory History of Breast Implants in the U.S. 2013. at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/BreastImplants/ucm064461.htm) Rohrich, 2008, Breast augmentation today: saline versus silicone – what are the facts?, Plast Reconstr Surg, 121, 669, 10.1097/01.prs.0000298115.96337.72 Gryskiewicz, 2014, Transaxillary nonendoscopic subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: a 10-year experience with gel vs saline in 2000 patients-with long-term patient satisfaction measured by the BREAST-Q, Aesthet Surg J Am Soc Aesthet Plast Surg, 34, 696, 10.1177/1090820X14530552 Macadam, 2010, Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes among saline and silicone implant recipients, Plast Reconstr Surg, 125, 761, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb5cf8 Macadam, 2013, Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: a comparison of shaped cohesive gel and round cohesive gel implant recipients, Plast Reconstr Surg, 131, 431, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6d55 McCarthy, 2010, Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of saline and silicone implants, Cancer, 116, 5584, 10.1002/cncr.25552 Spear, 2014, A prospective study on lipoaugmentation of the breast, Aesthet Surg J Am Soc Aesthet Plast Surg, 34, 400, 10.1177/1090820X13520449 Salgarello, 2012, Fat grafting and breast reconstruction with implant: another option for irradiated breast cancer patients, Plast Reconstr Surg, 129, 317, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6619 Ho, 2013, Optimizing patient-centered care in breast reconstruction: the importance of preoperative information and patient-physician communication, Plast Reconstr Surg, 132, 212e, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829586fa Pusic, 2012, Measuring and managing patient expectations for breast reconstruction: impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction, Expert Rev Pharmacoeconom Outcomes Res, 12, 149, 10.1586/erp.11.105 Mancuso, 2008, Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466, 424, 10.1007/s11999-007-0052-z Hudak, 2004, Testing a new theory of patient satisfaction with treatment outcome, Med Care, 42, 726, 10.1097/01.mlr.0000132394.09032.81 Sun, 2014, Assessing Women's preferences and preference modeling for breast reconstruction decision-making, Plast Reconstr Surg Glob open, 2, e125, 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000062 2015 Vandenbroucke, 2007, Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration, Epidemiol, 18, 805, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511 Edwards, 2002, Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review, BMJ, 324, 1183, 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183 McCarthy, 2012, The magnitude of effect of cosmetic breast augmentation on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life, Plast Reconstr Surg, 130, 218, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b3bc Coriddi, 2013, Analysis of satisfaction and well-being in the short follow-up from breast augmentation using the BREAST-Q, a validated survey instrument, Aesthet Surg J Am Soc Aesthet Plast Surg, 33, 245, 10.1177/1090820X12472980 Weigert, 2013, Patient satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being after breast augmentation in male-to-female transsexuals, Plast Reconstr Surg, 132, 1421, 10.1097/01.prs.0000434415.70711.49 Alderman, 2014, Understanding the effect of breast augmentation on quality of life: prospective analysis using the BREAST-Q, Plast Reconstr Surg, 133, 787, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000023 Carty, 2012, Patient satisfaction and surgeon experience: a follow-up to the reduction mammaplasty learning curve study, Eplasty, 12, e22 Gonzalez, 2012, Quality of life after breast reduction surgery: a 10-year retrospective analysis using the breast Q questionnaire: does breast size matter?, Ann Plast Surg, 69, 361, 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824a218a Coriddi, 2013, Analysis of satisfaction and well-being following breast reduction using a validated survey instrument: the BREAST-Q, Plast Reconstr Surg, 132, 285, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829587b5 Gurunluoglu, 2013, Outcomes analysis of patients undergoing autoaugmentation after breast implant removal, Plast Reconstr Surg, 132, 304, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829e7d9e Goyal, 2011, Outcome after autologous dermal sling-assisted immediate breast reconstruction, Br J Surg, 98, 1267, 10.1002/bjs.7531 Huang, 2011, Simultaneous scarless contralateral breast augmentation during unilateral breast reconstruction using bilateral differentially split DIEP flaps, Plast Reconstr Surg, 128, 593e, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c312 Salgarello, 2012, Immediate breast reconstruction after skin-or nipple-sparing mastectomy for previously augmented patients: a personal technique, Aesthet Plast Surg, 36, 313, 10.1007/s00266-011-9809-6 Dean, 2013, Rotation flap approach mastectomy, ANZ J Surg, 83, 139, 10.1111/ans.12008 Inbal, 2012, Simultaneous contralateral breast adjustment in unilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator breast reconstruction, J Reconstr Microsurg, 28, 285, 10.1055/s-0032-1311682 Salgarello, 2012, Inverted-T skin-reducing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction using the submuscular-subfascial pocket, Plast Reconstr Surg, 130, 31, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182547d42 Zhong, 2012, Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes, Cancer, 118, 1701, 10.1002/cncr.26417 Cha, 2013, Patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction surgery in a public hospital: use of the Breast-Q questionnaire, N. Z Med J, 126, 43 Eltahir, 2013, Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures, Plast Reconstr Surg, 132, 201e, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829586a7 Eriksson, 2013, Radiotherapy in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: risk factors, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures in a large Swedish multicenter cohort, Breast cancer Res Treat, 142, 591, 10.1007/s10549-013-2770-0 Koslow, 2013, Long-term patient-reported satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and implant reconstruction, Ann Surg Oncol, 20, 3422, 10.1245/s10434-013-3026-2 Rosson, 2013, Quality of life before reconstructive breast surgery: a preoperative comparison of patients with immediate, delayed, and major revision reconstruction, Microsurgery, 33, 253, 10.1002/micr.22081 Sugrue, 2013, An evaluation of patient reported outcomes following breast reconstruction utilizing Breast Q, Breast Edinb Scotl, 22, 158, 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.001 Tadiparthi, 2013, An analysis of the motivating and risk factors for conversion from implant-based to total autologous breast reconstruction, Plast Reconstr Surg, 132, 23, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f83e Wu, 2013, Human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm(R)) dimensional changes and stretching in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction, J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg JPRAS, 66, 1376, 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.05.018 Zhong, 2013, The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction, Trials, 14, 356, 10.1186/1745-6215-14-356 Albornoz, 2014, Implant breast reconstruction and radiation: a multicenter analysis of long-term health-related quality of life and satisfaction, Ann Surg Oncol, 21, 2159, 10.1245/s10434-014-3483-2 Chao, 2014, Monitoring patient-centered outcomes through the progression of breast reconstruction: a multicentered prospective longitudinal evaluation, Breast cancer Res Treat, 146, 299, 10.1007/s10549-014-3022-7 Davis, 2014, Breast reconstruction satisfaction rates at a large county hospital, Ann Plast Surg, 72, S61, 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000171 Mestak, 2014, Centrifugation versus puregraft for fatgrafting to the breast after breast-conserving therapy, World J Surg Oncol, 12, 178, 10.1186/1477-7819-12-178 Ng, 2014, Breast reconstruction post mastectomy: patient satisfaction and decision making, Ann Plast Surg Peled, 2014, Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction, Annal Plast Surg, 72, S48 Simpson, 2014, Multidisciplinary assessment for immediate breast reconstruction: a new approach, Surg Pract, 18, 111, 10.1111/1744-1633.12075