The Accumulation of Empty Containers in Urban Areas: Policy Implications from a Stochastic Formulation

Networks and Spatial Economics - Tập 14 - Trang 379-408 - 2014
Noel Pérez-Rodríguez1, Jose Holguín-Veras2
1Center for Infrastructure, Transportation, and the Environment, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, USA
2VREF Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, USA

Tóm tắt

The accumulation of empty cargo containers in urban areas is an important issue for communities and policy makers as these containers seem to restrict the use of valuable land and diminish the quality of life of communities close to ports and storage depots. Different reasons have been offered to explain this accumulation, with no definite answer. This paper examines the validity of the most frequently cited explanations using a stochastic formulation to model the accumulation process over a time-expanded network. To the authors’ knowledge, this represents the first paper dealing with empty containers as a concern for urban planning and policy making. This paper explores the impact that the planning horizon, variability, profit margins, acquisition costs and storage costs have on the accumulation of containers at areas with excess supply of empty units. The analyses suggest that: (1) trade imbalances create the conditions for the accumulation of empty containers, but cost considerations lead shipping companies to eventually store the surplus of empties at nearby urban areas; (2) the purchase price of new containers is not the factor that explains the accumulation of empty containers, though it may become important in the future if purchase prices drop below reposition costs; (3) although there is a need to store empty containers to protect against shortages, the observed accumulation of empty containers at supply areas far exceeds what seems justifiable by the operational needs; and (4) the accumulation of empty containers is thus primarily linked to the relationship between storage and reposition costs, as low storage costs seem to provide a significant financial incentive to accumulate empty containers. The paper argues that part of the problem is that the container industry is not taking into account the externalities they produce, and that this situation could be corrected by taxing empty container storage in an amount equal to the economic value of the externalities produced. Alternative courses of action include the use of land use zoning restrictions, and/or consensus based solutions that lead to voluntary reductions in the numbers of empty containers stored.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bromby R (2003) Ports boxed in by long wave of imports. The Australian, Sydney Business Monitor International Staff (2009) Full containers numbers fall as empties rise. Business Monitor Online, London Cheung R, Chen C (1998) A two-stage stochastic network model and solution methods for the dynamic container allocation problem. Transp Sci 32(2):142–162 Crainic T, Gendreau M, Dejax P (1993) Dynamic and stochastic models for the allocation of empty containers. Oper Res 41(102–126) Eksten B (2003) Ports contain clues to U.S. export slump. Star-News, Wilmington, 1A, 6A Erera AL, Morales JC, Savelsbergh M (2009) Robust optimization for empty repositioning problems. Oper Res 57:466–483 Gambardella L, Mastrolilli M, Rizzoli A, Zaffalon M (2001) An optimization methodology for intermodal terminal management. J Intell Manuf 12(521–534) Gao Q (1994) An operational approach for container control in shipping company shipping. Logist Transp Rev 30(267–282) Holguín-Veras J, Cetin M (2008) Optimal tolls for multi-class traffic: analytical formulations and policy implications. Transp Res A Policy Pract 43(4):445–467. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2008.11.012 Holguín-Veras J, Jara-Díaz S (1999) Optimal space allocation and pricing for priority service at container ports. Transp Res B 33(2):81–106 Holguín-Veras J, Walton CM (1996) State of the practice of information technology at marine container ports. Transp Res Rec 1522(−1):87–93 Holusha J (2001) Empty freight containers rising too high for Newark. New York Times, New York, B.7 Hwan K, Bae H (1999) Segregating space allocation models for container inventories in port container terminals. Int J Prod Econ 59(415–423) JOC Staff (2013) Rotterdam container volume rises, but total throughput drops. J Commerce 14(19):25 Journal of Commerce (2006) By the numbers: containerized ocean trade. J Commer 7(1):31 Kozan E, Preston P (1999) Genetic algorithms to schedule container transfers at multimodal terminals. Int Trans Oper Res 6:311–329 Li J, Leung SCH, Wu Y, Liu K (2007) Allocation of empty containers between multiple ports. Eur J Oper Res 182:400–412 Lloyd’s List (2003b) Limited exports help to pile up containers. Africa News, London Lloyd’s List (2003) Empty containers poised to push up freight charges. Lloyd’s List International, London, p 16 Machalaba D (2001) That new high-rise blocking your view may be a pile of boxes. Wall Str J A.1 Mongelluzzo B (2000) Import–export gap causes headaches. J Commer 1(1):1 Mongelluzzo B (2005) Against the tide; Carriers say they’re rejecting some low-value U.S. export cargoes to Asia. J Commer 6(25):32 Montgomery DC, Peck EA (1982) Introduction to linear regression analysis. Wiley, New York Muller G (1999) Intermodal freight transportation. Eno Transportation Foundation, Los Angeles O’Connell D (2005) Shipping faces crisis as British ports fill up. Sunday Times, London Rodrigue JP, Comtois C, Slack B (2009) The geography of transport systems. Routledge, London Strunsky S (2003) Shipping containers pile up around ports. Associated Press Online, New York Ugwoke F (2005) Port congestion: Shippers ordered to remove empty containers. London, Financial Times UNCTAD Secretariat (2009) Review of maritime transport: Developments in International Seaborne Trade Urquhart D (2007) Rotterdam rejects empty boxes as main terminal faces jam; Move blamed on surging volumes, bad weather and short staffing. The Business Times Singapore, Singapore