Testing the consistency between goals and policies for sustainable development: mental models of how the world works today are inconsistent with mental models of how the world will work in the future

Sustainability Science - Tập 12 - Trang 45-64 - 2016
Claire Richert1,2, Fabio Boschetti3,4, Iain Walker3,5, Jennifer Price3, Nicola Grigg3
1Irstea, UMR G-EAU, Montpellier, France
2Montpellier – France
3Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Organisation, Canberra, Australia
4School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
5School of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia

Tóm tắt

Understanding complex problems such as climate change is difficult for most non‐scientists, with serious implications for decision making and policy support. Scientists generate complex computational models of climate systems to describe and understand those systems and to predict the future states of the systems. Non-scientists generate mental models of climate systems, perhaps with the same aims and perhaps with other aims too. Often, the predictions of computational models and of mental models do not correspond with important implications for human decision making, policy support, and behaviour change. Recent research has suggested non-scientists’ poor appreciation of the simple foundations of system dynamics is at the root of the lack of correspondence between computational and mental models. We report here a study that uses a simple computational model to ‘run’ mental models to assess whether a system will evolve according to our aspirations when considering policy choices. We provide novel evidence of a dual-process model: how we believe the system works today is a function of ideology and worldviews; how we believe the system will look in the future is related to other, more general, expectations about the future. The mismatch between these different aspects of cognition may prevent establishing a coherent link between a mental model’s assumptions and consequences, between the present and the future, thus potentially limiting decision making, policy support, and other behaviour changes.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bain PG, Hornsey MJ, Bongiorno R, Jeffries C (2012) Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat Clim Change 2(8):600–603 Boschetti F (2012a) Causality, emergence, computation and unreasonable expectations. Synthese 185(2):187–194 Boschetti F (2012b) A computational model of a mental model used to reason about climate change. Environ Sci Policy 15(1):125–135 Boschetti F, de La Tour A, Fulton E, Little R (2010) Interactive modelling for natural resource management. Environ Model Softw 25(10):1075–1085 Boschetti F, Richert C, Walker I, Price J, Dutra L (2012) Assessing attitudes and cognitive styles of stakeholders in environmental projects involving computer modelling. Ecol Model 247:98–111 Boschetti F, Fulton E, Grigg N (2014) Citizens’ views of Australia’s future to 2050. Sustainability 7(1):222–247 Boschetti F, Walker I, Price J (2016) Modelling and attitudes towards the Future. Ecol Model 322:71–81 Boyd JN, Zimbardo PG (1997) Constructing time after death—the transcendental-future time perspective. Time Soc 6(1):35–54 Cohen J (1996) How many people can the earth support?. Norton & Company, New York Costanza R (2000) Social goals and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosystems 3(1):4–10 Craik KJW (1943) The nature of explanation. University Press, Cambridge Eng Cronin MA, Gonzalez C, Sterman JD (2009) Why don’t well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 108(1):116–130 Crutchfield JP (1994) The calculi of emergence: computation, dynamics, and induction. Physica D 75:11–54 D’Argembeau A (2012) Autobiographical memory and future thinking. Understanding autobiographical memory: theories and approaches. Berntsen D, Rubin DC (eds). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press D’Argembeau A, Van der Linden M (2007) “Emotional aspects of mental time travel.” Behav Brain Sci 30(3):320 D’Argembeau A, Lardi C, Van der Linden M (2012) Self-defining future projections: exploring the identity function of thinking about the future. Memory 20(2):110–120 Dessai S, Adger WN, Hulme M, Turnpenny J, Köhler J, Warren R (2004) Defining and experiencing dangerous climate change. Clim Change 64(1–2):11–25 Dorner D (1996) The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Metropolitan Books, Ney York Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE (2000) Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues 56(3):425–442 Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers Ehrlich I, Lui F (1997) The problem of population and growth: a review of the literature from Malthus to contemporary models of endogenous population and endogenous growth. J Econ Dyn Control 21(1):205–242 Feygina I, Jost JT, Goldsmith RE (2010) System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 36(3):326–338 Gagnon Thompson SC, Barton MA (1994) Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J Environ Psychol 14(2):149–157 Gerardi K, Goette L, Meier S (2013) Numerical ability predicts mortgage default. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(28):11267–11271 Greca IM, Moreira MA (2000) Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling. Int J Sci Educ 22(1):1–11 Grigg NJ, Boschetti F, Brede M, Finnigan JJ (2011) A probabilistic approach to exploring low-dimensional global dynamics. Procedia Environ Sci 6:122–135 Groesser SN, Schaffernicht M (2012) Mental models of dynamic systems: taking stock and looking ahead. Syst Dyn Rev 28(1):46–68 Guy S, Kashima Y, Walker I, O’Neill S (2014) Investigating the effects of knowledge and ideology on climate change beliefs. Eur J Soc Psychol 44(5):421–429 Halford GS, Baker R, McCredden JE, Bain JD (2005) How many variables can humans process? Psychol Sci 16(1):70–76 Halford GS, Cowan N, Andrews G (2007) Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: a new hypothesis. Trends Cognitive Sci 11(6):236–242 Heath Y, Gifford R (2006) Free-market ideology and environmental degradation. Environ Behav 38(1):48–71 Heaven PCL, Quintin DS (2003) Personality factors predict racial prejudice. Personality Individ Differ 34(4):625–634 Hohwy J (2013) The predictive mind, Oxford University Press Inayatullah S (2004) Causal Layered Analysis: Theory, historical context, and case studies. The causal layered analysis (CLA) Reader: theory and case studies of an integrative and transformative methodology. Inayatullah S. Taipei, Taiwan, Tamkang University Press: 8–49 Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Cambridgeshire; New York Johnson-Laird PN (2001) Mental models and deduction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(10):434–442 Johnson-Laird PN (2013) Mental models and cognitive change. J Cognitive Psychol 25(2):131–138 Johnson-Laird PN, Khemlani SS, Goodwin GP (2015) Logic, probability, and human reasoning. Trends Cogn Sci 19(4):201–214 Jones, N. A., H. Ross, T. Lynam, P. Perez and A. Leitch (2011). “Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods.” Ecology and Society. 16(1):46. [online] URL: http://wwwecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/. Accessed 2015 Jost JT, Amodio DM (2012) Political ideology as motivated social cognition: behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion 36(1):55–64 Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, Sulloway FJ (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol Bull 129(3):339 Kahan D (2013) Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: an experimental study. Judgment Decision Making 8(4):407–424 Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Change 2(10):732–735 Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York Kashima Y, Shi JQ, Tsuchiya K, Kashima ES, Cheng SYY, Manchi M, Shin SH (2011) Globalization and folk theory of social change: how globalization relates to societal perceptions about the past and future. J Soc Issues 67(4):696–715 Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol Bull 108(3):480–498 Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77(1–2):45–72 Leviston Z, Walker IA (2010) Baseline survey of australian attitudes to climate change: preliminary report. N. R. F. C. Adaptation, CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Perth Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 75(1):5–18 Moxnes E (1998) Overexploitation of renewable resources: the role of misperceptions. J Econ Behav Organ 37(1):107–127 Moxnes E (2000) Not only the tragedy of the commons: misperceptions of feedback and policies for sustainable development. Syst Dyn Rev 16(4):325–348 Moxnes E, Saysel AK (2009) Misperceptions of global climate change: information policies. Clim Change 93(1–2):15–37 New M, Liverman D, Schroder H, Anderson K (2011) Four degrees and beyond: the potential for a global temperature increase of four degrees and its implications. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc A Math, Phys Eng Sci 369(1934):6–19 Norman DA (1987) Some observations on mental models. Human-computer interaction. In: Baecker RM, Buxton WAS (eds) Readings in human-computer interaction: a multidisciplinary approach. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc, Los Altos, CA, pp 241–244 Nowak A, Rychwalska A, Borkowski W (2013) Why simulate? To develop a mental model. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 16(3):12 Pratto F, Çidam A, Stewart AL, Zeineddine FB, Aranda M, Aiello A, Chryssochoou X, Cichocka A, Cohrs JC, Durrheim K, Eicher V, Foels R, Górska P, Lee I-C, Licata L, Liu JH, Li L, Meyer I, Morselli D, Muldoon O, Muluk H, Papastamou S, Petrovic I, Petrovic N, Prodromitis G, Prati F, Rubini M, Saab R, Stekelenburg Jv, Sweetman J, Zheng W, Henkel KE (2013) Social Dominance in Context and in Individuals: Contextual Moderation of Robust Effects of Social Dominance Orientation in 15 Languages and 20 Countries. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 4:587–599 Price JC, Walker IA, Boschetti F (2014) Measuring cultural values and beliefs about environment to identify their role in climate change responses. J Environ Psychol 37:8–20 Quinn N (2005) How to reconstruct schemas people share, from what they say, Citeseer Raupach MR, Marland G, Ciais P, Le Quere C, Canadell JG, Klepper G, Field CB (2007) Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(24):10288–10293 Raupach MR, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Friedlingstein P, Rayner PJ, Trudinger CM (2011) The relationship between peak warming and cumulative CO2 emissions, and its use to quantify vulnerabilities in the carbon–climate–human system. Tellus B: no-no Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25(1):1–65 Shalizi CR, Crutchfield JP (2001) Computational mechanics: pattern and prediction, structure and simplicity. J Stat Phys 104(3–4):817–879 Spreng RN, Levine B (2006) The temporal distribution of past and future autobiographical events across the lifespan. Memory Cognition 34(8):1644–1651 Stanovich K (1999) Who is rational? studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ Stawarczyk D, Cassol H, D’Argembeau A (2013) Phenomenology of future-oriented mind-wandering episodes. Front Psychol 4:425 Sterman JD (2008) Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Science 322(5901):532–533 Sterman JD, Sweeney LB (2002) Cloudy skies: assessing public understanding of global warming. Syst Dyn Rev 18(2):207–240 Sterman JD, Sweeney LB (2007) Understanding public complacency about climate change: adults’mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Clim Change 80(3–4):213–238 Stern PC, Raimi KT (2015) Simple mental models for informing climate choices. Soc Res Int Quarterly 82:3 Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger DS, Edwards CS (1994) The consideration of future consequences—weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 66(4):742–752 Suddendorf, T. and M. C. Corballis (2007). “The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30(3):299 Sweeney LB, Sterman JD (2000) Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory. Syst Dynamics Rev 16(4):249–286 Tarantola A (1987) Inverse problem theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psychol Rev 110(3):403–421 Wiek A, Iwaniec D (2014) Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 9(4):497–512 Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–218 Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN (1999) Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(6):1271–1288