Testing Proposals for a “Democracy of the Future”

David Stadelmann1
1University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arnold, F., Freier, R., Pallauf, M., & Stadelmann, D. (2016). Voting for direct democratic participation: Evidence from an initiative election. International Tax and Public Finance, 23(4), 716–740.

Frey, B. S. (1994). Direct democracy: Politico-economic lessons from Swiss experience. American Economic Review, 84(2), 338–342.

Frey, B. S. (2017). Proposals for a democracy of the future. Homo Oeconomicus, 34(1), 1–9.

Hessami, Z. (2016). How do voters react to complex choices in a direct democracy? Evidence from Switzerland. Kyklos, 69(2), 263–293.

Kauder, B., & Potrafke, N. (2016). Supermajorities and political rent extraction. Kyklos, 69(1), 65–81.

Matsusaka, J. G. (2010). Popular control of public policy: A quantitative approach. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 5(2), 133–167.

Nurmi, H. (2017). Reforming democracy: Comment on “proposals for a democracy of the future” by Bruno Frey. Homo Oeconomicus, 34(2), 201–205.

Schofield, N. (2017). Comment on “proposals for a democracy of the future” by Bruno Frey. Homo Oeconomicus, 34(2), 191–194.

Stadelmann, D., Portmann, M., & Eichenberger, R. (2015). Income and policy choices: Evidence from parliamentary decisions and referenda. Economics Letters, 135, 117–120.

Stadelmann, D., & Torgler, B. (2017). Voting on embryonic stem cell research: Citizens more supportive than politicians. PLoS One, 12(1), 1–9.