Terpenoid Compositions, and Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of the Rhizome Essential Oils of Different Hedychium Species

Wiley - Tập 5 Số 2 - Trang 299-309 - 2008
Sushil Joshi1, C.S. Chanotiya2,3, Garima Agarwal1, Om Prakash1, A.K. Pant1, C. S. Mathela2
1Department of Chemistry, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantangar, US Nagar-263145, Uttarakhand, India
2Department of Chemistry, Kumaun University, Nainital-236002, Uttarakhand, India
3Present address: Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants.

Tóm tắt

AbstractA phytochemical study of the rhizome essential oils of four different Hedychium species was performed by means of GC and GC/MS analyses. H. ellipticum mainly contained 1,8‐cineole, sabinene, and terpin‐4‐ol, while H. aurantiacum possessed terpin‐4‐ol, para‐cymene, and bornyl acetate as the major entities. Similarly, trans‐meta‐mentha‐2,8‐diene and linalool were noticed in H. coronarium. Three different collections (IIII) of H. spicatum showed amazing differences in the relative contents of their essential oils, 1,8‐cineole and 10‐epi‐γ‐eudesmol being identified as markers for samples I and II, terpin‐4‐ol and sabinene being the major compounds in sample III. The rhizome essential oils of the above species were studied for their antioxidant activities by different methods, including their effect on the chelating properties of Fe2+, DPPH radical‐scavenging activity, and reducing power. Antimicrobial screenings of the oils by the paper‐disc method were performed against Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella flexneri, Pasteurella multocida, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella enterica enterica, and the respective minimum‐inhibitory‐concentration (MIC) values were determined. The rhizome essential oils from all Hedychium species exhibited moderate‐to‐good Fe2+ chelating activity. H. spicatum from collection site III showed a completely different DPPH radical‐scavenging profile than the samples from the other collection sites.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

K. R. Kirtikar B. D. Basu

Sharma P. K., 1979, J. Sci. Res. Plant Med., 1, 17

Malhotra C. L., 1984, J. Econ. Tax. Bot., 5, 841

Megoneisto, 1983, J. Econ. Tax. Bot., 4, 162

10.1080/10412905.2007.9699937

10.1016/j.jep.2006.01.016

Pryor W. A., 1991, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 53, 10.1093/ajcn/53.3.702

Kinsella J. E., 1993, Food Technol., 47, 85

10.1080/10408399009527528

Duthie G. G., 1993, Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 47, 759

10.1080/10408399209527581

10.1126/science.210504

10.1021/jf9801973

10.1021/jf00020a008

10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5

10.1021/jf9908188

10.1021/jf010172v

D. D. Miller

10.1042/bj2190001

10.1021/jf990845y

Garg S. N., 1977, Indian Perfum., 21, 79

Bottini A. T., J. Nat. Prod. 1, 50, 732, 10.1021/np50052a027

10.1002/ffj.2730100310

Nigam M. C., 1979, Parfum. Kosmet., 60, 245

10.1021/jf011369q

10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb13108.x

10.1021/jf00018a005

10.2331/suisan.54.1409

R. P. Adams ‘Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy’ Allured Publishing Carol Stream IL 1995.

10.1007/BF02552711

10.1111/j.1745-4565.2005.00564.x

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards ‘Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disc Susceptibility Testing’ 6th edn. Wayne PA 1997 M2–A6.

W. R. Bailey E. G. Scott