Temporal variations of mesozooplankton abundance and biomass in the mangrove creek area along the Karachi coast, Pakistan

Acta Oceanologica Sinica - Tập 33 - Trang 222-230 - 2014
Farah Naz1, Naureen Aziz Qureshi2, Noor Us Saher1
1Centre of Excellence in Marine Biology, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
2Department of Zoology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Tóm tắt

The temporal variations of mesozooplankton abundance and biomass (1-Volumetric method by settling volume and displacement volume and 2- Gravimetric method through wet weight, dry weight and ash-free dry weight) with relation to environmental parameters were studied in the mangrove creek area of Karachi coast, Pakistan. The data of mesozooplankton samples along with environmental parameters (temperature, salinity, pH, etc.) were collected during January 1998 to December 1998 from two creek stations. The abundance of mesozooplankton also exhibited seasonal trends at both stations. At Sta. S2, the highest and lowest abundance values were observed during post-monsoon and southwest monsoon respectively whereas, at Sta. S1, a clear trend of high abundance in pre-monsoon to low abundance in southwest monsoon was observed. Mesozooplankton abundance was also positively correlated with settling volume, displacement volume, wet weight and dry weight. The highest biomass value was observed in the northeast monsoon and pre-monsoon periods. The results of the canonical analysis of the output from the discriminate function was tested. Out of fifteen variables, only one was significantly different in single character ratios dry weight/ash free-dry weight (F 3,23=4.78, P<0.005). The mesozooplankton community was collectively composed of 28 taxa. Among these groups, copepoda (66.3%), gastropod larvae (9.94%), evadne (4.60%), zoea (3.60%), cypris nauplii (2.56%), lemellibranch larvae (1.87%), chaetognaths (1.81%), ostracods (1.73%), lucifer (1.15%) and barnacles nauplii (1.35%) contributed the most to the similarities within Sta. S1, while copepoda (74.68%), cypris nauplii (5.29%), gastropods (4.87%), barnacles nauplii (4.81%), evadne (1.72%), zoea (1.53%) and caridean larvae (1.18%) at Sta. S2. The remaining mesozooplanktonic group were accounted for less than 5% and 6% at Sta. S1 and Sta. S2 respectively, of the total organisms. Similarity percentage (SIMPER) analysis revealed that copepoda, gastropod larvae and cyprus nauplii contributed most of the similarities within Sta. S2 along Sta. S1.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amjad S, Khan M E, Hashmi, et al. 1995. Impact of monsoon reversal on zooplankton abundance and composition in the northwestern Arabian Sea. In: Thomson M F, Tirmizi N M, eds. Proceeding of the International Conference on The Arabian Sea Living Marine Resources and the environment. Lahore, Pakistan: Vanguard Books (Pvt.) Ltd, 497–508 Bode A, Alvarez-Ossorio T, Gonzalez N. 1998. Estimations of mesozooplankton biomass in a coastal upwelling area off NW Spain. J Plankton Res, 20(5): 1005–1014 Bonecker C C, Aoyagui A S, Santos R M. 2009. The impact of impoundment on the rotifer communities in two tropical floodplain environments: interannual pulse variations. Braz J Biol, 69(2 Suppl): 529–537 Baranova O K, Brie T, Boyer, et al. 2009. World Ocean Database 2009, Chapter 16: Plankton data. In: Levitus S, ed. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 66. Washington, DC: US Gov Printing Office, 1–216 Birdsong R S, Marshall H G, Alden R W, et al. 1987. Lower Chesapeake Bay mainstem plankton monitoring program. Final Report: July 1985–June 1986. Norfolk, Virginia: Old Dominion University Research Foundation Birdsong R S, Marshall H G, Alden R W, et al. 1988. Chesapeake Bay plankton monitoring program. Final report: 1986–1987. Norfolk, Virginia: Old Dominion University Research Foundation Costa K G D, Pereira L C C, Costa R M D. 2008. Short and long-term temporal variation of the zooplankton in a tropical estuary (Amazon region, Brazil). Bol Mus Para Emílio Goeldi Ciências Naturais, Belém, 3(2): 127–141 Cushing D H, Humphrey G F, Banse K, et al. 1958. Report of the committee on terms and equivalents. Rapports et Procès-verbaux des Réunions du Conseil Permanent International pour l’Exploration de la Mer, 14(1): 15–16 Dagg M J, Orther P B, Yamani F A. 1987. Winter-time distribution and abundance of copepod nauplli in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish Bulletin, 86(2): 319–330 Dvoretsky V G, Dvoretsky A G. 2013. Summer mesozooplankton community of Moller Bay (Novaya Zemlya Archipelago, Barents Sea). Oceanologia, 55(1): 205–218 Fabian H, Koppelmann R, Weikert H. 2005. Full-depths zooplankton composition at two deep sites in the western and central Arabian Sea. Indian J Mar Sci, 34(2): 174–187 Fernández De Puelles M L, D Gra S S, Herna Ndez-Leo N. 2003. Annual cycle of zooplankton biomass, abundance and species composition in the neritic area of the Balearic Sea, Western Mediterranean. Mar Ecol, 24(2): 123–139 Fraser W R, Hofmann E E. 2003. A predator’s perspective on causal links between climate change, physical forcing and ecosystem response. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 265: 1–15 George D G, White N J. 1985. The relationship between settled volume and displacement volume in samples of freshwater Zooplankton. J Plank Res, 7(3): 411–414 Goswami S C. 1985. Secondary production and zooplankton abundance in the coastal waters from Vengurla to Malpe West coast of India. Indian J Mar Sci, 14(2): 85–92 Halliday N C. 2001. A comparison of morphometric and geometric methods for the estimation of individual zooplankton volumes. Sarsia, 86(2): 101–105 Harris R P, Wiebe P H, Lenz J, et al. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual. London: Academic Press, 1–684 Huda I A, Ahmed J. 1988. Zooplankton production trends in the inshore waters of a mangrove ecosystem long the Karachi Coast. In: Thompson M F, Tirmizi N M, eds. Poceeding of the International Conference on Marine Science of the Arabian Sea. Washington, D C: American Institute of Biological Science, 407–415 Huda I A. 1993. Zooplankton standing stock and composition in coastal waters of Arabian Sea (Sindh and Makran coasts of Pakistan). In: Tirmizi N M, Kazmi Q, eds. Proceeding of a National Seminar on Study and Management in Coastal Zones in Pakistan. Pakistan: Marine Reference Collection and Resources Centre, University of Karachi, 121–130 Hwang J S, Kumar R, Hsieh C W, et al. 2010. Patterns of zooplankton distribution along the marine, estuarine, and riverine portions of the Danshuei ecosystem in northern Taiwan. Zoological Studies, 49(3): 335–352 Kane J. 1993. Variability of zooplankton biomass and dominant species abundance on Georges Bank 1977–1986. Fish Bulletin, 91: 464–474 Kibirige I, Perissinotto R. 2003. The zooplankton community of the Mpenjati Estuary, a South African temporarily open/closed system. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 58(4): 724–741 Khatoon Z, Hussain M. 2006. Some hydrographic features of Korangi-Phitti Creek. Int J Biol Biot, 3(4): 745–752 Li K Z, Yin J Q, Huang L M, et al. 2006. Spatial and temporal variations of mesozooplankton in the Pearl River estuary, China. Estuarine Coast Shelf Sci, 67(4): 543–552 Lenz J. 1973. Zooplankton biomass and its relation to particulate matter in the upper 200 m of the Arabian Sea during NE monsoon. In: Zeitschol B, ed. The Biology of the Indian Ocean. Berlin: Springer-Verlage, 239–241 Muhammed A, Arshad M. 1966. Preliminary observation on the composition of zooplankton along the Karachi coast. Agrculture Pakistan, 17: 227–237 Murphy E. 1995. Spatial structure of the Southern Ocean ecosystem: predator-prey linkages in Southern Ocean food webs. J Anim Ecol, 64: 333–347 Nakajima R, Yoshida T, Othman B H R, et al. 2010. High detritus/phytoplankton content in net-plankton samples from coral reef water: source of over-estimation in zooplankton biomass by measuring seston weight. Plank Bent Res, 5(2): 69–73 Naz F, Qureshi N A, Saher N. 2012. Temporal and spatial variations in the species composition distribution and abundance and copepods in mangrove creek area along the Karachi coast, Pakistan. Indian J Geo Mar Sci, 41(1): 61–69 Noor-Uddin. 1967a. An account of the phytoplankton of Karachi coast with a note on their seasonal variation, fluctuations and distibution. Agric Pakistan, 18: 51–83 Noor-Uddin. 1967b. An account of the zooplankton of Karachi coast with a note on their seasonal variations, fluctuations and distribution. Agric Pakistan, 18: 197–224 Omori M, Ikeda T. 1984. Methods in Marine Zooplankton Ecology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1–332 Park G S, Marshall H G. 2000. Estuarine relationships between zooplankton community structure and trophic gradients. J Plankton Res, 22(1): 121–135 Pace M L. 1986. An empirical analysis of zooplankton community size structure across lake trophic gradients. Limnol Oceanogr, 31(1): 45–55 Paffenhofer G A, Tzeng M, Hristov R, et al. 2003. Abundance and distribution of nanoplankton in the epipelagic subtropical/tropical open Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Plankton Research, 25(12): 1535–1549 Qasim S Z. 1982. Oceanography of the northern Arabian Sea. Deep-Sea Res, 29(9): 1041–1068 Qureshi N A. 1997. Distribution, abundance and diversity of mesozooplankton from surface waters of the inner continental shelf of Northern Gulf of Mexico. Pakistan Journal Zoology, 29(4): 391–403 Rao A N. 1987. Mangrove ecosystem of Asia and the Pacific. In: Mangrove of Asia and the Pacific: Status and management. Tech Rept UNDP/UNESCO Research training Pilot Prog. Mangrove ecosystems in Asia and Pacific (Ras/79/002). Philippines: JMC Press, 1–48 Resmi S, Reddy R V, Venkatesha Moorthy K S, et al. 2011. Zooplankton dynamics in the coastal waters of adubidri, Karnataka. India J Geo Mar Sci, 40(1): 134–141 Rizvi S H, Baquer J, Saleem M. 1994. Productivity of Gharo-Phitti Creek system. In: Majid A, Khan M Y, Moazzam M, et al., eds. Proceeding of National Seminar on Fisheries Policy and Planning. Karachi: Marine Fisheries Department, Government of Pakistan, 221–231 Robin R S, Srinivasan M, Chandrasekar K. 2009. Distribution of zooplankton from Arabian Sea, along Southern Kerala (Southwest Coast of India) during the cruise. Curr Res J Biol Sci, 1(3): 155–159 Roman M R, Gauzens A L, Cowles T J. 1985. Temporal and spatial changes in epipelagic microzooplankton and mesozooplankton biomass in warm-core Gulf Stream ring 82-B. Deep-Sea Res, 32(B): 1007–1022 Sterza J M, Fernandes L L. 2006. Zooplankton community of the Vitória Bay estuarine system (Southeastern Brazil). Characterization during a three-year study. Brazilian J Oceanogr, 54(2–3): 95–105 Strickland J D H, Parsons T R A. 1972. A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis. Bulletin No. 167. Ottawa, Canada: Fisheries Research Board of Canada Wiebe P H. 1988. Functional regression equations for zooplankton displacement volume, wet weight, dry weight and carbon: a correction. Fish Bulletin, 86(4): 833–835 Wiebe P H, Boyd S, Cox J L. 1975. Relationship between zooplankton displacement volume, wet weight, dry weight, and carbon. Fish Bulletin, 73(4): 777–786 Wojciech W, Pauli J E, Kwaśniewski S, et al. 2009. Distribution, diversity and biomass of summer zooplankton from the coastal Canadian Beaufort Sea. Polar Biology, 33(3): 321–335