Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics

Anna Bergek1, Marko P. Hekkert2, Staffan Jacobsson3, Jochen Markard4, Björn A. Sandén3, Bernhard Truffer2,5
1Department of Management and Engineering, Linkoping University, SE-581 83 Linkoping, Sweden.
2Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
3Dept. of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, SE‐412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
4Department of Management, Technology and Economics, Group for Sustainability and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
5Department of Environmental Social Sciences, Eawag, P.O. Box 611, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alkemade, 2011, Transition policy and innovation policy: friends or foes?, Environ. Innovation Soc. Transitions, 1, 125, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.009

Andersson, 2000, Monitoring and assessing technology choice: the case of solar cells, Energy Policy, 28, 1037, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00090-2

Arthur, 2009

Asheim, 2002, Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘Sticky’ and global ‘Ubiquitous’ knowledge, J. Technol. Trans., 27, 77, 10.1023/A:1013100704794

Bento, 2015, Spatial diffusion and the formation of a technological innovation system in the receiving country: the case of wind energy in Portugal, Environ. Innovation Soc. Transitions, 15, 158, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.10.003

Bergek, 2012

Bergek, 2008, Functions in innovation systems: a framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers

Bergek, 2003, The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries, 197

Bergek, 2008, Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis, Res. Policy, 37, 407, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003

Bergek, 2008, ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 20, 575, 10.1080/09537320802292768

Bergek, 2013, Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research, Energy Policy, 56, 568, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.038

Binz, 2014, Why space matters in technological innovation systems—Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology, Res. Policy, 43, 138, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002

Binz, 2012, Conceptualizing leapfrogging with spatially coupled innovation systems: the case of onsite wastewater treatment in China, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 79, 155, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.016

Blum, 2015, An analysis of remote electric mini-grids in Laos using the technological innovation systems approach, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 95, 218, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.002

Boschma, 2005, Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Reg. Stud., 39, 61, 10.1080/0034340052000320887

Brusoni, 2001, Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make, Adm. Sci. Q., 46, 597, 10.2307/3094825

Bunnell, 2001, Spaces and scales of innovation, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 25, 569, 10.1191/030913201682688940

Carlsson, 2006, Internationalization of innovation systems: a survey of the literature, Res. Policy, 35, 56, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.003

Carlsson, 1994, Technological systems and economic policy: the diffusion of factory automation in Sweden, Res. Policy, 23, 235, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)90036-1

Carlsson, 2002, Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues, Res. Policy, 31, 233, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X

Carlsson, 1991, On the nature, function and composition of technological systems, J. Evol. Econ., 1, 93, 10.1007/BF01224915

Chang, 2004, Comparing approaches to systems of innovation: the knowledge perspective, Technol.Soc., 26, 17, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2003.10.002

Coenen, 2012, Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions, Res. Policy, 41, 968, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014

Dewald, U., Fromhold-Eisebith, M., 2013. Trajectories of sustainability transitions in scale-transcending innovation systems—a conceptual approach based on the case of photovoltaics, paper under review by Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

Dewald, 2011, Market formation in technological innovation systems-diffusion of photovoltaic applications in Germany, Ind. Innovation, 18, 285, 10.1080/13662716.2011.561028

Dewald, 2012, The local sources of market formation: explaining regional growth differentials in german photovoltaic markets, Eur. Plann. Stud., 20, 397, 10.1080/09654313.2012.651803

Dosi, 1982, Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Res. Policy, 11, 147, 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6

Enel, Eni, E.ON, Gas Natural Fenosa, GasTerra, GDF, SUEZ, Iberdrola, RWE, Vattenfall, 2013. Heads of nine leading European energy companies propose concrete measures to rebuild Europe’s energy policy.

Farla, 2012, Sustainability transitions in the making: a closer look at actors, strategies and resources, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 79, 991, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001

FME, 2000

Freeman, 2002

Fridlund, 1993

Fuenfschilling, 2014, The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory, Res. Policy, 43, 772, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010

Garud, 2003, Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship, Res. Policy, 32, 277, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2

Geels, 2002, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Res. Policy, 31, 1257, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8

Geels, 2004, From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, Res. Policy, 33, 897, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015

Geels, 2007, Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Res. Policy, 36, 399, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003

Gosens, 2015, The role of transnational dimensions in emerging economy ‘Technological Innovation Systems’ for clean-tech, J. Clean. Prod., 86, 378, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.029

Haley, 2015, Low-carbon innovation from a hydroelectric base: the case of electric vehicles in Québec, Environ. Innovation Soc. Transitions, 14, 5, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.05.003

Hall, 2001

Hekkert, 2007, Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 74, 413, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002

Hess, 2014, Sustainability transitions: a political coalition perspective, Res. Policy, 43, 278, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.008

Hillman, 2008, Cumulative causation in biofuels development: a critical comparison of the Netherlands and Sweden, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 20, 593, 10.1080/09537320802292826

Jacobsson, 2004, Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology, Ind. Corp. Change, 13, 815, 10.1093/icc/dth032

Jacobsson, 2006, A framework for guiding policy-makers intervening in emerging innovation systems in ‘catching-up’ countries, Eur. J. Dev. Res., 18, 687, 10.1080/09578810601094902

Jacobsson, 2012, Formation of competences to realize the potential of offshore wind power in the European Union, Energy Policy, 44, 374, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.069

Jacobsson, 2013, Mechanisms blocking the dynamics of the European offshore wind energy innovation system—Challenges for policy intervention, Energy Policy, 63, 1182, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.077

Jacobsson, 2006, The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology, Energy Policy, 34, 256, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029

Jacobsson, 2014, Conceptual confusion—an analysis of the meaning of concepts in technological innovation systems and sociological functionalism, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 1

Johnson, 2001, Inducement and blocking mechanisms in the development of a new industry: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden

Karltorp, 2012, Explaining regime destabilisation in the pulp and paper industry, Environ. Innovation Soc. Transitions, 2, 66, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.12.001

Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310

Kern, 2008, Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands, Energy Policy, 36, 4093, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.018

Kitschelt, 1986, Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies, Br. J. Political Sci., 16, 57, 10.1017/S000712340000380X

Kivimaa, 2014, Policy mixes, policy interplay and low carbon transitions: the case of passenger transport in Finland, Environ. Policy Governance, 24, 28, 10.1002/eet.1629

Konrad, 2012, Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 79, 1084, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.008

Lauber, V., Jacobsson, S., 2013. The politics and economics of constructing, contesting and restricting socio-political space for renewables –the case of the German Renewable Energy Act, International workshop on low carbon innovation politics, Eindhoven University, Eindhoven, 26–28 November 2013.

Lauber, 2004, Three decades of renewable electricity policies in Germany, Energy Environ., 15, 599, 10.1260/0958305042259792

Lieberherr, E., Truffer, B., 2014. Governance Modes and Innovativeness: A comparative analysis of dynamic capabilities in three water utilities, paper under review by Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions.

Lijphart, 2012

Lovio, 2012, Comparing alternative path creation frameworks in the context of emerging biofuel fields in the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland, Eur. Plann. Stud., 20, 773, 10.1080/09654313.2012.667925

Malerba, 2002, Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Res. Policy, 31, 247, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1

Markard, 2012, Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Res. Policy, 41, 955, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013

Markard, 2015, Socio-technical transitions and policy change—Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy, Environ. Innovation Soc. Transitions

Markard, 2006, Innovation processes in large technical systems: market liberalization as a driver for radical change, Res. Policy, 35, 609, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.008

Markard, 2008, Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework, Res. Policy, 37, 596, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004

Markard, J., Wirth, S., Truffer, B., 2014. Institutional dynamics in emerging technological fields and their context—legitimacy of biogas technology in Germany, mimeo, ETH/EAWAG, Zürich.

Maskell, 2006, Building global knowledge pipelines: the role of temporary clusters, Eur. Plann. Stud., 14, 997, 10.1080/09654310600852332

McDowall, 2013, The development of wind power in China, Europe and the USA: how have policies and innovation system activities co-evolved, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 25, 163, 10.1080/09537325.2012.759204

Meadowcroft, 2011, Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions, Environ. Innovation Soc. Transitions, 1, 70, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003

Meelen, 2013, Towards an integrated framework for analysing sustainable innovation policy, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 25, 957, 10.1080/09537325.2013.823146

Murphy, J.T., 2013. Human Geography and Transition Studies: Promising Intersections, paper under review by Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

Musiolik, 2011, Creating and shaping innovation systems: formal networks in the innovation system for stationary fuel cells in Germany, Energy Policy, 39, 1909, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.052

Musiolik, 2012, Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: towards a conceptual framework for system building, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 79, 1032, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.003

Negro, 2008, Explaining the success of emerging technologies by innovation system functioning: the case of biomass digestion in Germany, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 20, 465, 10.1080/09537320802141437

Negro, 2007, Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion-A functional analysis, Energy Policy, 35, 925, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.027

Oinas, 2002, The evolution of technologies in time and space: from national and regional to spatial innovation systems, Int. Reg. Sci. Rev., 25, 102, 10.1177/016001702762039402

Onufrey, 2014, Technology dynamics in multi-technology industries: selection and variety creation through the lens of path dependency and path generation

Onufrey, K., Bergek, A., 2015. Self-reinforcing mechanisms in a multi-technology industry: understanding sustained technological diversity in a context of path dependency. under review by a scientific journal.

Quitzow, R., 2013. Dynamics of a Policy-Driven Market: The Co-Evolution of Technological Innovation Systems for Solar PV in China and Germany, paper under review by Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

Rip, 1998, Technological change, 327

Rothaermel, 2001, Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent's advantage: an empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry, Res. Policy, 30, 1235, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00142-6

Sabatier, 1998, The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe, J. Eur. Public Policy, 5, 98, 10.1080/13501768880000051

Sabatier, 1993

Sandén, 2011, A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden, Res. Policy, 40, 403, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.005

Sandén, 2014, Teknikpolitiska lärdomar, 261

Schenner, 2011

Schmidt, 2014, Explaining the diffusion of biogas in India: a new functional approach considering national borders and technology transfer, Environ. Econ. Policy Stud., 16, 171, 10.1007/s10018-013-0058-6

Sharif, 2006, Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept, Res. Policy, 35, 745, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001

Smith, 2012, What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Res. Policy, 41, 1025, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012

Smits, 2010

Suurs, 2009, Competition between first and second generation technologies: lessons from the formation of a biofuels innovation system in the Netherlands, Energy, 34, 669, 10.1016/j.energy.2008.09.002

Suurs, 2009, Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: the case of biofuels in the Netherlands, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 76, 1003, 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.03.002

Tigabu, 2015, The diffusion of a renewable energy technology and innovation system functioning: comparing bio-digestion in Kenya and Rwanda, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 90, 331, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.019

Truffer, 2012, Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies, Reg. Stud., 46, 1, 10.1080/00343404.2012.646164

Truffer, B., Markard, J., Binz, C., Jacobsson, S., 2012. A literature review on Energy Innovation Systems: Structure of an emerging scholarly field and its future research directions. Radar-Paper of the strategic research alliance for Energy Innovation Systems and their dynamics, Dübendorf/Gothenburg.

Ulmanen, 2013

Unruh, 2000, Understanding carbon lock-in, Energy Policy, 28, 817, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7

Van de Ven, 1989, A framework for understanding the emergence of new industries, 195

Vasseur, 2013, A comparative analysis of photovoltaic technological innovation systems including international dimensions: the cases of Japan and the Netherlands, J. Clean. Prod., 48, 200, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.017

Weber, 2012, Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework, Res. Policy, 41, 1037, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015

Wesseling, J.H., Farla, J.C.M., Sperling, D., Hekkert, M.P., 2014. Car manufacturers’ changing political strategies on the ZEV mandate. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 33, 196-209.

Wieczorek, A., Hekkert, M.P., Harmsen, R., 2013. Interrelatedness of national offshore wind Innovation Systems: implications for policy, paper under review by Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (revision).

Wieczorek, 2012, Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars, Sci. Public Policy, 39, 74, 10.1093/scipol/scr008

Wirth, 2011, Context matters: how existing sectors and competing technologies affect the prospects of the Swiss Bio-SNG innovation system, Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 78, 635, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.001

Wirth, 2013, Informal institutions matter: professional culture and the development of biogas technology, Environ. Innovation Soc. Transitions, 8, 20, 10.1016/j.eist.2013.06.002

Von Hippel, 2005, Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation, JfB, 55, 63, 10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8

Wooten, 2008, Organizational fields: past, present and future