Techno-Optimism and Farmers’ Attitudes Toward Climate Change Adaptation

Environment and Behavior - Tập 52 Số 1 - Trang 82-105 - 2020
Maaz Gardezi1, J. Gordon Arbuckle2
1South Dakota State University, Brookings, USA
2Iowa State University, Ames, USA

Tóm tắt

In industrialized societies, techno-optimism is a belief that human ingenuity, through improved science and technology, will ultimately provide remedies to most current and future threats to human well-being, such as diseases, climate change, and poverty. Here we examine (a) whether techno-optimism is found among Midwestern corn and soybean farmers and (b) how this confidence in human ingenuity influences their support for climate change adaptation. By examining data from a survey of nearly 5,000 grain farmers in the Midwestern United States, we found that greater techno-optimism can reduce farmers’ support for climate change adaptation and increase their propensity to express a preference to delay adaptation-related actions. This study advances our understanding of how social and cognitive factors influence farmers’ attitude toward climate change. Findings from this study can also help extension educators to develop outreach programs that are sensitive to farmers’ views about the ability of science and technology to solve climate change–related issues.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.139

10.2489/jswc.69.6.505

10.1007/s10584-013-0700-0

10.1177/0013916513503832

10.1007/s10584-013-0707-6

10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

Barry J., 2012, Transdisciplinary perspectives on transitions to sustainability

10.1111/j.1549-0831.1990.tb00699.x

10.1111/j.1549-0831.1994.tb00551.x

10.1177/109019819101800208

10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x

10.2489/jswc.73.2.143

Catton W. R., 1978, The American Sociologist, 13, 41

10.1002/wcc.469

10.1177/00139169921972254

10.1038/Nclimate1452

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.010

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.09.006

Dimitri C., Effland A., Conklin N. (2005). The 20th century transformation of U.S. agriculture and farm policy (Transformation. Economic Information Bulletin Number, 3). Retrieved from http://proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswao&AN=edswao.389725811&site=eds-live&scope=site

10.1007/BF02691936

10.1007/s11027-012-9374-6

10.1111/jcom.12108

10.1177/1086026612459964

10.1111/risa.12943

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002

10.5751/ES-00089-030107

10.1007/978-94-017-9682-8_3

Hatfield J., 2014, Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment, 150

10.1007/s10584-017-1997-x

Hayes A., 2013, Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis

10.1289/ehp.1103515

10.1108/09653560710739568

10.1007/s10584-016-1718-x

10.2489/jswc.66.4.276

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.019

10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.103

Lowe P., 1990, Technological change and the rural environments

10.1007/s11252-006-0017-0

10.1071/WF12213

Möllering G., 2006, Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity

10.2134/jeq2014.08.0352

10.2489/jswc.72.3.215

10.1080/13669877.2014.910687

10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

10.2489/jswc.63.5.300

10.1017/S0022050700066778

10.1007/s10460-016-9719-y

10.1007/0-387-36921-X_17

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.006

10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663

10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2013-34

10.1007/s10584-010-9937-z

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.010

10.1080/08941920590948002

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x

Wang S. L., 2015, Agricultural productivity growth in the US: Measurement, trends, and drivers, ERR-189

Williams J., 2007, Human Ecology Review, 14, 130

10.1080/10705510701758166

10.1002/2013WR015200