Team leader autonomy in new product development

Management Decision - Tập 33 Số 9 - Trang 5-11 - 1995
AshlyPinnington1, DennisHaslop2
1Senior Lecturer in Human Resource Management, Coventry University and Associate Faculty Member, Henley Management College
2Doctoral Research Associate, Henley Management College and Managing Director, Environmental Monitoring Systems Ltd.

Tóm tắt

Reports the results of a UK company survey on the strategic and operational autonomy of team leaders working on new product development (NPD). The data are based on returns from 194 manufacturing companies and were completed by either the director of R&D or a member of the board with overall responsibility for the management of NPD project team leaders. The management of NPD project team leaders was classified into task variables (six strategic and seven operational) and a member of top management was asked to rate on a seven‐point Likert scale the extent to which each task was the autonomous responsibility of the team leader as opposed to the responsibility of other managers. Subdivides the sample into high technology and low‐to‐medium technology companies and analyses the strategic and operational management of NPD team leaders according to the company′s performance (measured by annual sales turnover) and its market environment, using four measures of the market environment: product life cycle, market growth rate, market share and R&D spending on new product development. Finds annual sales turnover to be the most important and closely associated variable with high amounts of autonomy granted to team leaders working on new product development. In medium‐to‐low technology companies, the market growth rate and R&D spending are additional, significantly associated variables. Concludes that UK companies reduce their top management controls in order to facilitate the autonomy of NPD team leaders when company sales turnover is high. Additionally, it is arguable from the evidence of the data that medium‐to‐low technology companies are more influenced by recent market performance than are high technology companies because, in addition to sales, they facilitate more autonomy according to market growth rate, market share and R&D spending.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Bailyn, L., “Autonomy in the industrial R&D lab”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 24 No. 2, 1985, pp. 129‐46.

2. Breaugh, J.A., “The measurement of work autonomy”, Human Relations, Vol. 38, 1985, pp. 551‐70.

3. Raelin, J.A., “An anatomy of autonomy”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 3 No. 3, 1989, pp. 216‐28.

4. Brookes, D., “Who′s accountable for accountability?”, Canadian Manager , Vol. 17 No. 2, July‐August 1992, pp. 13‐15.

5. Feldman, F.P., “The broken wheel: the inseparability of autonomy and control in innovation within organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 26No. 2, March 1989.

6. Ouchi, W.G., Theory Z, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA, 1981.

7. Pascale, R. and Athos, A., The Art of Japanese Management, Warner Books , New York, NY, 1981.

8. Peters, T. and Waterman, R., In Search of Excellence, Harper & Row, New York, NY, 1982.

9. Kanter, R.M., The Change Masters, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY, 1983.

10. Lawrence, P. and Dyer, P., Renewing American Industry, Free Press, New York, NY, 1983.

11. Van de Ven, A.H., “Central problems in the management of innovation”, Management Science, Vol. 32, 1986, pp. 590‐607.

12. Rothwell, R., “Successful industrial innovation critical factors for the 1990′s ”, R&D Management, Vol. 22 No. 31992, pp. 221‐39.

13. Burns, T. and Stalker, G., The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London, 1961.

14. Barrow, C., Brown, R. and Clarke, L., The Business Growth Handbook, Kogan Page, London, 1992.

15. Abell, D.F. and Hammond, J.S., Strategic Market Planning: Problems and Analytical Approaches, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979.

16. Page, A.S. and Jones, R.C., “Business growth”, Management Decision, Vol. 29 No. 5, 1990, pp. 8‐11.

17. Twiss, B.C., Managing Technological Innovation, 4th ed., Pitman, London, 1992.

18. Maidique, M.A. and Hayes, R.H., “Executive leadership and the management of innovation and change”, in Tushman, M.L. and Moore, W.L. (Eds), Readings in the Management of Innovation, Ballinger Publishing, New York, NY, 1988, pp. 689‐704.

19. Haslop, D., “Team leader autonomy in new product development companies”,DBA draft thesis (unpublished) , Henley Management College and Brunel University, 1995.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Management Decision

Tập 33 Số 9

5-11

Thông tin tác giả