Teacher behavior and student outcomes: Results of a European study

Aparicio, J. J., & Moneo, M. R. (2005). Constructivism, the so-called semantic learning theories, and situated cognition versus the psychological learning theories. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 180–198.

Askew, M., & William, D. (1995). Recent research in mathematics education 5–16. London: Office for Standards in Education.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS: structural equations program manual. California: Multivariate Software Inc.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing a theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.

Borich, G. D. (1992). Effective Teaching Methods (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Brookover, W. B., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School systems and student achievement: schools make a difference. New York: Praeger.

Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.

Brown, M. W., & Mels, G. (1990). Ramona PC: user manual. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

Bryne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Newbury Park: Sage.

Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 432–463). New York: Macmillan.

Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. F., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 347–366.

Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The Dynamics of Educational Effectiveness. A contribution to Policy, Practice and Theory in contemporary schools. London: Routledge.

Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2010). Explaining stability and changes in school effectiveness by looking at changes in the functioning of school factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(4), 409–427.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (1). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/ . Accessed 14 Jan 2014.

De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10(3), 249–266.

De Jong, R., Westerhof, K. J., & Kruiter, J. H. (2004). Empirical evidence of a comprehensive model of school effectiveness: a multilevel study in mathematics in the 1st year of junior general education in the Netherlands. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(1), 3–31.

Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(3/4), 407–442.

Doyle, W. (1990). Classroom knowledge as a foundation for teaching. Teachers College Record, 91(3), 347–360.

Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–27.

Evertson, C. M., Anderson, C., Anderson, L., & Brophy, J. (1980). Relationships between classroom behaviour and student outcomes in junior high math and English classes. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 43–60.

Gijbels, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2006). New learning environments and constructivism: the students’ perspective. Instructional Science, 34(3), 213–226.

Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Grieve, A. M. (2010). Exploring the characteristics of “teachers for excellence”: teachers’ own perceptions. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 265–277.

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Conceptual and methodological issues in studying school leadership effects as a reciprocal process. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 149–173.

Harjunen, E. (2012). Patterns of control over the teaching–studying–learning process and classrooms as complex dynamic environments: a theoretical framework. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 139–161.

Heck, R. H., & Moriyama, K. (2010). Examining relationships among elementary schools’ contexts, leadership, instructional practices, and added-year outcomes: a regression discontinuity approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(4), 377–408.

Hofman, R. H., Hofman, W. H., & Gray, J. M. (2010). Institutional contexts and international performances in schooling: comparing patterns and trends over time in international surveys. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 153–173.

Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1–10.

Kline, R. H. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. London: Gilford Press.

Kyriakides, L. (2008). Testing the validity of the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness: a step towards the development of a dynamic model of effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(4), 429–446.

Kyriakides, L. & Creemers, B. P. M. (2008). Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom-level factors upon student achievement: a study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(2), 183–205.

Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2009). The effects of teacher factors on different outcomes: two studies testing the validity of the dynamic model. Effective Education, 1(1), 61–86.

Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., & Antoniou, P. (2009). Teacher behaviour and student outcomes: Suggestions for research on teacher training and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 12–23.

Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., & Panayiotou, A. (2012). Report of the Data Analysis of the Student Questionnaire Used to Measure Teacher Factors: Across and Within Country Results (ESF project: Establishing a knowledge base for quality in education: testing a dynamic theory for education 08-ECRP-012). Nicosia, Cyprus: University of Cyprus.

Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B., Antoniou, P., & Demetriou, D. (2010). A synthesis of studies searching for school factors: Implications for theory and research. British Educational Research Journal, 36(5), 807–830.

Kyriakides, L., & Tsangaridou, N. (2008). Towards the development of generic and differentiated models of educational effectiveness: a study on school and teacher Effectiveness in Physical Education. British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 807–838.

Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315–336.

Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: the junior years. Somerset: Open Books.

Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the mathematics enhancement programme (primary). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(3), 273–303.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.

Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.

Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness: the international dimension. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 232–256). London: Falmer Press.

Reynolds, D. (2006). World class schools: some methodological and substantive findings and implications of the International School Effectiveness Research Project (ISERP). Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(6), 535–560.

Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.

Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Sammons, P. (2009). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: a contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(1), 123–129.

Scheerens, J. (2013). School leadership effects revisited: review and meta-analysis of empirical studies. Dordrecht: Springer.

Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.

Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: the role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis research. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499.

Shepard, L. A. (1989). Why we need better assessments. Educational Leadership, 46(2), 4–8.

Stenmark, J. K. (1992). Mathematics assessment: myths, models, good questions, and practical suggestions. Reston: NCTM.

Strand, S. (2010). Do some schools narrow the gap? Differential school effectiveness by ethnicity, gender, poverty, and prior achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 289–314.

Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.

Walberg, H. J. (1986). What works in a nation still at risk. Educational Leadership, 44(1), 7–10.