Taming polysemous signals: The role of marketing intensity on the relationship between financial leverage and firm performance

Review of Financial Economics - Tập 33 - Trang 29-40 - 2017
John Bae1, Sang-Joon Kim2, Hannah Oh3
1Finance at Elon University, NC 27244, United States
2Management at Ewha School of Business, Ewha Womans University, South Korea
3Marketing at the College of Business Administration, University of Nebraska Omaha, NE 68182, United States

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis study attempts to reconcile the two strands of research on the impacts of financial leverage on firm valuation. The prior literature has shown that financial leverage has a polysemous effect. In other words, it provides two opposing signals of firm performance (i.e., financial distress vs. a driver of positive change in a firm's prospects). Given that the effects of financial leverage are contradictory, we specify how these divergent signals appear and propose that there is a non‐monotonic effect of financial leverage on firm valuation. The study also shows that marketing activities can be strategically implemented to tame these polysemous signals. Marketing activities are costly actions for a firm, especially one in an adverse environment with high leverage, and are rewarded in terms of firm valuation. Therefore, marketing activities can help reinforce the driver signal and alleviate the distress signal of financial leverage, thus increasing firm valuation. This study finds a U‐shaped relationship between financial leverage and Tobin's q and a positive moderating effect of marketing intensity on the curvilinear relationship.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barber B.M., 1997, Detecting long‐run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics, Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 341, 10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00890-2 L.J.BourgeoisIII J.V.Singh.Organizational slack and political behavior among top management teams.Academy of Management Proceedings.1983;43–47 10.2307/256301 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.05.005 Campello M., 2006, Working paper 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.04.001 10.2307/2555624 10.1016/j.accfor.2004.02.001 10.1287/mnsc.38.9.1264 10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5 10.2307/2555961 10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.3 Foster G., 1994, Marketing, cost management and management accounting, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 6, 43 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00252-0 Frank M.Z., 2005, Handbook of corporate finance: Empirical corporate finance 10.1002/smj.4250100202 10.1080/09603100500387139 10.1162/00335530360535162 10.1093/rfs/hhg033 10.1509/jmkg.65.2.67.18259 10.1509/jmkg.69.3.115.66364 10.1016/j.mulfin.2006.03.003 Hanssens D.M., 2003, Market response models: Econometric and time series analysis Harris M., 1991, The theory of capital structure, Journal of Finance, 46, 297, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03753.x Haugen R.A., 1978, The insignificance of bankruptcy costs to the theory of optimal capital structure, Journal of Finance, 33, 383, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb04855.x 10.1007/s10657-005-5276-3 Jensen M.C., 1986, The agency cost of free cash flow: Corporate finance and takeovers, American Economic Review, 76, 323 Joshi A., 2008, Working paper 10.1509/jmkg.74.1.20 10.1162/003355397555163 10.1287/mksc.1050.0153 Kraus A., 1973, A state‐preference model of optimal financial leverage, Journal of Finance, 28, 911, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01415.x 10.2307/2326770 10.1509/jmkg.72.5.98 Lynch J.E., 1990, Increased sophistication in advertising budget setting, Journal of Advertising Research, 30, 67 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.08.023 10.1509/jmkg.71.1.35 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90069-C J.M.C.Mesquita J.E.Lara.Capital structure and profitability: The Brazilian case.Academy of Business and Administration Sciences Conference.2003;11–13 Miller M.H., 1977, Debt and taxes*, The Journal of Finance, 32, 261 10.1509/jmkr.47.4.594 10.1287/mksc.1060.0261 Modigliani F., 1958, The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment, American Economic Review, 48, 261 10.1509/jmkg.73.1.59 Myers S.C., 1977, Determinants of corporate borrowing, Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147, 10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0 Myers S.C., 1984, The capital structure puzzle, Journal of Finance, 39, 575, 10.2307/2327916 10.1257/jep.15.2.81 Myers S.C., 1984, Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have, Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187, 10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0 Opler T.C., 1994, Financial distress and corporate performance, Journal of Finance, 49, 1015, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb00086.x 10.1509/jmkg.72.1.16 10.1002/smj.4250160403 Ross S.A., 1977, The determination of financial structure: The incentive‐signalling approach, Bell Journal of Economics, 8, 23, 10.2307/3003485 10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740025 10.1016/0304-405X(92)90029-W 10.2307/1882010 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.05.002 10.2307/1252110 10.1177/014920630102700610 10.2307/1251799 Stulz R.M., 1990, Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies, Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 3, 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90011-N Titman S., 2000, Working paper 10.1016/0165-4101(86)90016-9 Titman S., 1988, The determinants of capital structure choice, Journal of Finance, 43, 1, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02585.x Tsai B.‐H., 2006, Working paper Weill L., 2008, Leverage and corporate performance: Does institutional environment matter?, Small Business Economics, 30, 215, 10.1007/s11187-006-9045-7 Whited T.M., 1992, Debt, liquidity constraints, and corporate investment: Evidence from panel data, Journal of Finance, 47, 1425, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04664.x Wooldridge J.M., 2010, Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data 10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0085