Talking Politics: The Relationship Between Supportive and Opposing Discussion With Partisan Media Credibility and Use

Communication Research - Tập 49 Số 2 - Trang 221-244 - 2022
Jay D. Hmielowski1, Sarah M. Staggs2, Myiah J. Hutchens1, Michael A. Beam3
1University of Florida, FL, USA
2TaylorMade Golf Company, Inc., CA, USA
3Kent State University, OH, USA

Tóm tắt

In this article, we test a dynamic intracommunication process looking at the relationships between interpersonal discussion, perceived credibility of partisan media, and partisan media use. Using the theoretical foundation of hostile media perceptions, with a specific focus on relative hostile media, we examine whether interpersonal communication affects perceived credibility of liberal and conservative media outlets and whether these effects translate into increased use or avoidance of partisan media outlets. Using data collected during the 2016 U.S. election, we find that supportive interpersonal discussion is associated with greater perceived credibility of liberal media outlets (e.g., MSNBC) among liberals, which results in increased use of liberal leaning news outlets. In addition, we find that discussion with those who hold opposing views is associated with increased perceived credibility of conservative media outlets (e.g., Fox News) among conservatives, which translates into greater use of conservative leaning outlets. Similarly, talking to those who hold opposing views decreases perceived credibility of liberal media outlets (e.g., MSNBC) among conservatives, resulting in decreased use of liberal leaning outlets.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson A. A., Yeo S. K., Brossard D., Scheufele D. A., Xenos M. A. (2016). Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(1), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw022

Ansolabehere S., Rivers D. (2013). Cooperative survey research. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-022811-160625

Ansolabehere S., Schaffner B. (2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis, 22(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt025

Arceneaux K., Johnson M., Murphy C. (2012). Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161100123X

Arendt F., Northup T., Camaj L. (2019). Selective exposure and news media brands: Implicit and explicit attitudes as predictors of news choice. Media Psychology, 22(3), 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1338963

Barnidge M., Gunther A. C., Kim J., Hong Y., Perryman M., Tay S. K., Knisely S. (2020). Politically motivated selective exposure and perceived media bias. Communication Research, 47, 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217713066

10.4324/9781315112824-2

Binder A. R., Dalrymple K. E., Brossard D., Scheufele D. A. (2009). The soul of a polarized democracy: Testing theoretical linkages between talk and attitude extremity during the 2004 presidential election. Communication Research, 36(3), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333023

Coe K., Tewksbury D., Bond B. J., Drogos K. L., Porter R. W., Yahn A., Zhang Y. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00381.x

Donsbach W., Mothes C. (2013). The dissonant self: Contributions from dissonance theory to a new agenda for studying political communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679124

Eveland W. P.Jr., Hayes A. F., Shah D. V., Kwak N. (2005). Observations on estimation of communication effects on political knowledge and a test of intracommunication mediation. Political Communication, 22(4), 505–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600500311428

Eveland W. P.Jr., Hively M. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x

Eveland W. P.Jr., Shah D. V. (2003). The impact of individuals and interpersonal factors and perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 26, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162895X.00318

Feldman L., Myers T. A., Hmielowski J. D., Leiserowitz A. (2014). The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: Testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 590–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12108

Garrett R. K., Stroud N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105

Gentzkow M., Shapiro J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qir044

Gunther A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1086/269308

10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc217

Gunther A. C., Schmitt K. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x

Hart P. S., Nisbet E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416646

Hayes A. F., 2017, Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach

Hmielowski J. D. (2012). Intramedia moderation, electoral ambivalence, and electoral decision making. Mass Communication and Society, 15(3), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.616640

Hmielowski J. D., Beam M. A., Hutchens M. J. (2017). Bridging the partisan divide? Exploring ambivalence and information seeking over time in the 2012 US presidential election. Mass Communication and Society, 20(3), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1278775

Holbert R. L. (2005). Intramedia mediation: The cumulative and complementary effects of news media use. Political Communication, 22(4), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600500311378

Holbert R. L., Benoit W. L. (2009). A theory of political campaign media connectedness. Communication Monographs, 76(3), 303–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903074693

Jamieson K. H., 2008, Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment

Katz E., 1955, Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications

Kiousis S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4(4), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0404_4

Knobloch-Westerwick S. (2012). Selective exposure and reinforcement of attitudes and partisanship before a presidential election. Journal of Communication, 62, 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01651.x

Landreville K. D., Holbert R. L., LaMarre H. L. (2010). The influence of late-night TV comedy viewing on political talk: A moderated-mediation model. The International Journal of Press/politics, 15(4), 482–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210371506

Lang A., 2010, Rethinking communication: Keywords in communication research

Lee T. T. (2010). Why they don’t trust the media: An examination of factors predicting trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 54(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210376308

10.7208/chicago/9780226069159.001.0001

Levendusky M. S., Druckman J. N., McLain A. (2016). How group discussions create strong attitudes and strong partisans. Research & Politics, 3(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.177/2053168016645137

McLeod J. M., Scheufele D. A., Moy P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198659

Morris J. S. (2007). Slanted objectivity? Perceived media bias, cable news exposure, and political attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 88(3), 707–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00479.x

10.1017/CBO9780511617201

Poole K. T., 2007, Ideology & Congress

Rivers D., 2009, Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, 1, 627

Russell A. (2018). US senators on Twitter: Asymmetric party rhetoric in 140 characters. American Politics Research, 46(4), 695–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17715619

Slater M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x

Slater M. D. (2015). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.897236

Slater M. D., Henry K. L., Swaim R. C., Anderson L. L. (2003). Violent media content and aggressiveness in adolescents: A downward spiral model. Communication Research, 30(6), 713–736. https://doi.org/10.177/0093650203258281

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755509.001.0001

Stroud N. J., 2017, The Oxford handbook of political communication

Stroud N. J., Lee J. K. (2013). Perceptions of cable news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 16(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.646449

Tan A. S. (1980). Mass media use, issue knowledge and political involvement. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 241–248. https://doi.org/www.jstor.org/stable/2748432

Thórisdóttir H., Jost J. T. (2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 32(5), 785–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.008040.x

Thorson K., Vraga E., Ekdale B. (2010). Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903225571

Tsfati Y., Cappella J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371

10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577

Wojcieszak M. (2010). “Don’t talk to me”: Effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New Media & Society, 12, 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342775

10.1017/CBO9780511818691

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Communication Research

Tập 49 Số 2

221-244

Thông tin tác giả