TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings

Engineering Structures - Tập 56 - Trang 1787-1799 - 2013
Sergio Lagomarsino1, Andrea Penna2, Alessandro Galasco2, Serena Cattari1
1Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, University of Genoa, Italy
2Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture - University of Pavia, Italy

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Fajfar, 1999, Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic spectra, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 28, 979, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::AID-EQE850>3.0.CO;2-1

Freeman SA. The capacity spectrum method as a tool for seismic design. In: Proc. 11th European conference of earthquake engineering, Paris, France; 1998.

Magenes G. A method for pushover analysis in seismic assessment of masonry buildings. In: Proc. 12th WCEE, Auckland, New Zealand; 2000.

Roca, 2005, Strength capacity of masonry wall structures by the equivalent frame method, J Struct Eng ASCE, 131, 1601, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:10(1601)

EN 1998-1. Eurocode 8. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. Part 1-1: General rules – seismic actions and general requirements for structures. CEN, Brussels, Belgium; 2004.

NTC 2008. Decreto Ministeriale 14/1/2008. Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportations. G.U. S.O. n.30 on 4/2/2008; 2008 [in Italian].

Galasco A, Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Resemini S. Non-linear seismic analysis of masonry structures. In: Proc. 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada; 2004 [paper n. 843].

Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Galasco A, Cattari S. TREMURI program: Seismic Analyses of 3D Masonry Buildings, Release 2.0, University of Genoa, Italy; 2012 [mailto: [email protected]].

STADATA. 3Muri Program, Release 5.0.4; 2012 [www.3muri.com].

Tomaževič, 1987, Dynamic modelling of masonry buildings: storey mechanism model as a simple alternative, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 15, 731, 10.1002/eqe.4290150606

Applied Technology Council (ATC). Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings. Basic procedures manual, FEMA 306, Redwood City, CA; 1998.

Applied Technology Council (ATC). Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 356, Washington DC; 2000.

Tomaževič M. The computer program POR, Report ZRMK, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 1978 [in Slovenian].

Braga F, Dolce M. A method for the analysis of antiseismic multi-storey masonry buildings. In: Proc. 6th I.B.Ma.C., Rome, Italy; 1982. p. 1088–99 (in Italian).

Cattari S, Lagomarsino S. Modelling the seismic response of unreinforced existing masonry buildings: a critical review of some models proposed by codes. In: Proc. 11th Canadian masonry symposium, Toronto, Ontario; 2009.

Grande, 2011, A beam finite element for nonlinear analysis of masonry elements with or without fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) reinforcements, Int J Architectural Heritage, 5, 693, 10.1080/15583058.2010.490616

Magenes, 1998, Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of masonry buildings, Proc Brit Masonry Soc, 1998, 190

Lagomarsino S, Galasco A, Penna A. Non linear macro-element dynamic analysis of masonry buildings. In: Proc. ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN), Crete, Greece; 2007.

Kappos, 2002, Evaluation of simplified models for lateral load analysis of unreinforced masonry buildings, J Struct Eng ASCE, 128, 890, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:7(890)

Salonikos, 2003, Comparative inelastic pushover analysis of masonry frames, Eng Struct, 25, 1515, 10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00118-4

Belmouden, 2009, An equivalent frame model for seismic analyis of masonry and reinforced concrete buildings, Constru Build Mater, 23, 40, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.023

Pasticier, 2008, Non-linear seismic analysis and vulnerability evaluation of a masonry building by means of the SAP2000 V. 10 code, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 37, 467, 10.1002/eqe.770

Gambarotta L, Lagomarsino S. On the dynamic response of masonry panels. In: Proc. national conference “masonry mechanics between theory and practice”, Messina, Italy; 1996 [in Italian].

Brencich A, Lagomarsino S. A macro-elements dynamic model for masonry shear walls. In: Proc. 4th Int. symp. computer methods in structural masonry (STRUMAS IV), Pratolino, Italy: 1997. E&FN Spoon, London; 1998. p. 67–75.

Penna A. A macro-element procedure for the non-linear dynamic analysis of masonry buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, Polytechnic of Milan, Italy; 2002 [in Italian].

Penna, 2013, A nonlinear macro-element model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn

Dolce, 1991, Schematizzazione e modellazione degli edifici in muratura soggetti ad azioni sismiche, L’Industria delle Costruzioni, 25, 44

Yi, 2006, Lateral load tests on a two-story unreinforced masonry building, J Struct Eng ASCE, 132, 643, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:5(643)

Cattari, 2013, Seismic assessment of mixed masonry–reinforced concrete buildings by non-linear static analyses, Earthquake Struct, 4, 10.12989/eas.2013.4.3.241

EN 1998-3. Eurocode 8, Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, CEN, Brussels, Belgium; 2005.

ASCE/SEI 41/06. Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA; 2007.

Gattesco N, Clemente I, Macorini L, Noè S. Experimental investigation on the behaviour of spandrels in ancient masonry buildings. In: Proc. 14th WCEE, Beijing, China; 2008.

Beyer, 2012, Quasi-static monotonic and cyclic tests on composite spandrels, Earthquake Spectra, 28, 885, 10.1193/1.4000058

Beyer, 2012, Quasi-static cyclic tests on masonry spandrels, Earthquake Spectra, 28, 907, 10.1193/1.4000063

Graziotti F, Magenes G, Penna A. Experimental cyclic behaviour of stone masonry spandrels. In: Proc. 15th WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal; 2012.

Cattari S. Modelling of existing masonry and mixed masonry–reinforced concrete buildings by the equivalent frame approach: formulation of synthetic models. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Genoa, Italy; 2007 [in Italian].

Calderini, 2009, In-plane strength of unreinforced masonry piers, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 38, 243, 10.1002/eqe.860

Priestley MJN. Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering. Revisited: The Mallet Milne Lecture 2003, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy; 2003.

Cattari S, Lagomarsino S. A strength criterion for the flexural behaviour of spandrel in un-reinforced masonry walls. In: Proc. 14th WCEE, Beijing, China; 2008.

Turnšek V, Sheppard P. The shear and flexural resistance of masonry walls. In: Proc. int. research conference on earthquake engineering, Skopje, Japan; 1980. p. 517–573.

Benedetti, 1984, Seismic assessment of masonry constructions, Ingegneria Sismica, I, 9

Mann W, Müller H. Failure of shear-stressed masonry – an enlarged theory, tests and application to shear-walls. In: Proc. int. symposium on load-bearing brickwork, London, UK; 1980. p. 1–13.

Magenes, 1997, In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 26, 1091, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199711)26:11<1091::AID-EQE693>3.0.CO;2-6

Beyer, 2012, Peak and residual strengths of brick masonry spandrels, Eng Struct, 41, 533, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.015

EN 1992-1-1. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings, CEN, Bruxelles, Belgium; 2004.

Panagiotakos, 2001, Deformations of RC members at yielding and ultimate, ACI Struct J, 98, 135

MIT, Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportation, Circ. C.S.Ll.Pp. No. 617 of 2/2/2009. Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al Decreto Ministeriale 14 Gennaio 2008. G.U. S.O. n.27 of 26/2/2009, No. 47 [in Italian].

Cattari S, Resemini S, Lagomarsino S. Modelling of vaults as equivalent diaphragms in 3D seismic analysis of masonry buildings. In: Proc. 6th Int. conference on structural analysis of historical construction, Bath, UK; 2008.

Tomasi R, Piazza M, Baldessari C. The refurbishment of existing timber floors: characterization of the in-plane behaviour. In: Proc. int. conference on protection of historical buildings (Prohitech 09), vol. 1. Rome, Italy: CRC Press, Taylor&Francis; 2009. p. 255–60.

Brignola, 2009, Evaluation and control of the in-plane stiffness of timber floors for the performance-based retrofit of URM buildings, Bull New Zealand SocEarthquake Eng, 42, 204, 10.5459/bnzsee.42.3.204-221

NZS 3603. Timber structures standard. Department of Building and Housing, Wellington, New Zealand; 1993.

Anthoine, 2006, A simple displacement control technique for pushover analyses, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 35, 851, 10.1002/eqe.560

Magenes G, Kingsley GR, Calvi GM. Static testing of a full scale, two-story masonry building: test procedure and measured experimental response. In: Experimental and numerical investigation on a brick masonry prototype, GNDT Report 3.0, Pavia, Italy; 1995.

Calderini C, Cattari S, Lagomarsino S. In-plane seismic response of unreinforced masonry walls: comparison between detailed and equivalent frame models. In: Proc. ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN 2009), Rodhes, Greece; 2009.

Calderini, 2008, A continuum model for in-plane anisotropic inelastic behaviour of masonry, J Struct Eng ASCE, 134, 209, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:2(209)

Anthoine A, Magonette G, Magenes G. Shear-compression testing and analysis of brick masonry walls. In: Proc. 10th European conference on earthquake engineering, Wien, Austria: 1994. Duma editor, Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 1995.