TOWARDS AN INSTITUTIONS-THEORETIC FRAMEWORK COMPARING SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC DIFFUSION PATTERNS IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES

International Journal of Innovation Management - Tập 11 Số 04 - Trang 565-592 - 2007
Kwok L. Shum1, Chihiro Watanabe2
1Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
2Tokyo Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Meguro-ku, Ookayama, Tokyo, Japan

Tóm tắt

This paper studies and compares the actual historic solar photovoltaic (PV) installation data in Japan and the United States and proposes two deployment models to account for the differences. Deployment, along with research, development and demonstration, constitutes what is known as the RD3 (PCAST — President's Council of Advances in Science and Technology, United States) innovative chain of a new technology. Japan deploys PV focusing on the niche of utility grid-tied small-scale system (90 per cent of which is standardised roof-top residential PV system) using highly integrated value chain; this seems to draw upon her strong manufacturing culture and associated social technology and institutions for suppliers-dominated innovations. The United States deploys PV as a broadly defined innovation emphasising user-oriented customisation in both on and off grid, residential and industrial applications using small independent and intermediary system integrators. Empirical analysis of the diffusion patterns in the grid-tied small system category in respective contexts suggests that Japan's institutions seem to match her mass deployment strategy while the United States' combination of fragmented industry structure and diversity deployment gives rise to a complex diffusion pattern calling for continual institutional innovation or co-evolution. Our research, therefore, highlights that commercialisation of new technology or technical change, in general, is not an autonomous process and has strong institutional underpinnings. We formalise and generalise this "match" (Perez, 1983) argument in accordance with Nelson and Sampat's (2001) framework of physical technology vs social technology and their interactions. Some potential future extensions regarding utilities for this model are then highlighted.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/00343409012331346184

Allmendinger G., Harvard Business Review, 131

Aoki M., 2001, Towards a Comparative Institutional Analysis, 10.7551/mitpress/6867.001.0001

T. Bresnahan and S. Greenstein, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1997) pp. 1–83.

Cabral L., 2006, New Frontiers in the Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Davies S., 1979, The Diffusion of Process Innovations

Dosi G., 1989, Technical Change and Economic Theory

Edquist C., 1997, Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organisations

Fleck J., 2000, Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process

Freeman C., 1997, The Economics of Industrial Innovation

10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00092-X

10.1093/0199248893.001.0001

2003, National Survey Report of PV Power Application in the United States

Kodama F., 1995, Emerging Patterns of Innovation — Source of Japan's Technological Edge

Kodama F., 2000, POM Facing the New Millennium — Evaluating the Past, Leading with the Present and Planning the Future of Operations

Langlois R., 2001, Path Dependence and Creation

Lissoni F., 1994, The Handbook of Industrial Innovation

Lundvall B., 1988, Technology and Economic Theory

10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00152-9

10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.037

10.1016/0016-3287(83)90050-2

Rogers E., 2003, Diffusion of Innovation

Rosenberg N., 1982, Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics

Serchuk A., 1998, Expanding Markets for PV: What to do next?

10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.014

Shum K., Journal of Services Research

Shum K., Energy Policy

Stoneman P., 2002, The Economics of Technological Diffusion

Stoneman P., 2006, New Frontiers in the Economics of Innovation and New Technology

10.1111/1468-2370.00062

10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7

10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001

Wallis J., 1986, Long Term Factors in American Economic Growth

Watanabe C., Technovation, 3, 205

10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00073-6

Watanabe C., 2002, Technological Change and the Environment

Wene C., 2000, Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

International Journal of Innovation Management

Tập 11 Số 04

565-592

Thông tin tác giả