THEORIES OF COMMITMENT, ALTRUISM AND RECIPROCITY: EVIDENCE FROM LINEAR PUBLIC GOODS GAMES

Economic Inquiry - Tập 45 Số 2 - Trang 199-216 - 2007
Rachel Croson1
1#N# * University of Pennsylvania.

Tóm tắt

Theories of commitment, altruism, and reciprocity have been invoked to explain and describe behavior in public goods and social dilemma situations. Commitment has been used to explain behaviors like water conservation and voting. Altruism has been applied to explain contributions to charities and intergenerational transfers and bequests. Reciprocity has been invoked to explain gift exchange and labor market decisions. This paper describes a set of experiments, which distinguish between these competing theories by testing their comparative statics predictions in a linear public goods setting. Results provide strong support for reciprocity theories over either theories of commitment or of altruism. (JEL C9, D64, H41, C72)

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/1928162

10.2307/1885099

Altonji J., 1992, “Is the Extended Family Altruistically Linked? Direct Tests Using Micro Data.”, American Economic Review, 82, 1177

10.1016/0047-2727(88)90043-6

10.1086/261662

10.2307/2234133

Andreoni J, 1993, “An Experimental Test of the Public Goods Crowding‐Out Hypothesis.”, American Economic Review, 83, 1317

Baldry J, 1987, “Income Tax Evasion and the Tax Schedule.”, Public Finance, 42, 357

10.1086/260265

10.2307/1882640

Bergstrom T., 1993, “How Altruism Can Prevail in an Evolutionary Environment.”, American Economic Review, 83, 149

Bordignon M, 1990, “Was Kant Right? Voluntary Provision of Public Goods under the Principle of Unconditional Commitment.”, Economic Notes, 3, 342

10.1016/0047-2727(93)90039-V

10.1257/jep.9.2.209

Chakrabarti S., 1993, “Uncertain Altruism and Investment in Children.”, American Economic Review, 83, 994

10.7208/chicago/9780226110615.001.0001

Coate S, 1995, “Altruism, the Samaritan’s Dilemma, and Government Transfer Policy.”, American Economic Review, 85, 46

Collard D, 1978, Altruism and Economy

10.1016/0047-2727(84)90036-7

10.1086/261470

10.1016/S0165-1765(97)82136-2

10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00078-5

10.1016/S0193-2306(01)08005-X

Davis D., 1994, Experimental Economics

Feldstein M., 1975, “The Income Tax and Charitable Contributions: Part II—The Impact on Religious, Educational and Other Organizations.”, National Tax Journal, 28, 81, 10.1086/NTJ41862054

Forbes(untitled article).22 January 1996 157(2) p.18.

10.2307/2601057

10.1016/0014-2921(93)90120-Y

Greene W, 1990, Econometric Analysis

10.1007/BF00154357

Hollander H, 1990, “A Social Exchange Approach to Voluntary Contribution.”, American Economic Review, 80, 1157

10.2307/1882648

Kagel J. andA.Roth.The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton:Princeton University Press 1995.

Kaplan A. E, 1996, Giving USA

10.1016/0047-2727(94)01421-J

Kranton R, 1996, “Reciprocal Exchange: A Self‐Sustaining System.”, American Economic Review, 86, 830

10.1016/0022-0531(82)90029-1

10.2307/2553800

Ledyard J, 1995, The Handbook of Experimental Economics, 111

10.1086/226937

Newsweek.“Our Titanic Love Affair ”23 February 1998 p.58.

10.1086/261951

Smith V.“Experimental Economics: Behavioral Lessons for Microeconomic Theory and Applications.” Nancy L. Schwartz Memorial Lecture. Evanston IL:Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate School of Management 1990.

10.1016/0047-2727(94)01455-W

10.1108/EUM0000000000139

10.2307/2232444

10.2307/2232294

10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00187-6

10.1016/0047-2727(94)90059-0