Tái đề cập đến "Hệ số tác động"

Mabe M, Amin M: Growth dynamics of scholarly and scientific journals. Scientometrics. 2001, 51: 147-162. 10.1023/A:1010520913124. Mabe M: The Growth and Number of Journals. Serials. 2003, 16: 191-197. Garfield E: Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science. 1955, 122: 108-111. Adam D: The counting house. Nature. 2002, 415: 726-729. Garfield E: Which medical journals have the greatest impact?. Ann Intern Med. 1986, 105: 313-320. Garfield E: Journal impact factor: a brief review. Cmaj. 1999, 161: 979-980. Science Citation Index. [http://www.isinet.com/products/citation/sci/]- Garfield E: How ISI selects Journals for Coverage: Quantitative and Qualitative Considerations. Current Contents. 1990, 22: 5-13. Moed HF, Burger WJM, Frankfort JG, Van Raan AFJ: On the measurement of research performance: the use of bibliometric indicators. 1987, Leiden, Science Studies Unit, LISBON-Institute, Universith of Leiden Bordons M, Fernández MT, Gómez I: Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics. 2002, 53: 195-206. 10.1023/A:1014800407876. Garfield E: The meaning of the Impact Factor. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2003, 3: 363-369. Moller AP: National citations. Nature. 1990, 348-480. Seglen PO: Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. Bmj. 1997, 314: 498-502. Moed HF, Burger WJM, Frankfort JG, Van Raan AFJ: The application of bibliometric indicators: important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered. Scientometrics. 1985, 8: 177-203. 10.1007/BF02016935. Whitehouse GH: Citation rates and impact factors: should they matter?. Br J Radiol. 2001, 74: 1-3. Garfield E: Long-term vs. short-term journal impact: does it matter?. Physiologist. 1998, 41: 113-115. Seglen PO: Bruk av siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder i evaluering av forskningsaktivitet. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989, 104: 331-335. Narin F, Pinski G, H GH: Structure of the biomedical literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1976, 27: 25-45. Jacsó P: A deficiency in the algorithm for calculating the Impact Factor of scholarly journals: The Journal Impact Factor. Cortex. 2001, 37: 590-594. van Leeuwen TN, Moed HF: Development and application of journal impact measures in the Dutch science system. Scientometrics. 2002, 53: 249-266. 10.1023/A:1014808709694. Seglen PO: Evaluation of scientists by journal impact. Representations of science and technology. Edited by: Weingart P, Sehringer R and Winterhager M. 1992, Leiden, DSWO Press, 240-252. Murali NS, Murali HR, Auethavekiat P, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN, Manek NJ, Ghosh AK: Impact of FUTON and NAA bias on visibility of research. Mayo Clinic Porceedings. 2004, 79: 1001-1006. BioMed Central - the Open Access Publisher. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/]- PLoS - Public Library of Sicence. [http://www.plos.org/]- Dong P, Loh M, Mondry A: Relevance similarity: an alternative means to monitor information retrieval systems. Biomed Digit Libr. 2005, 2: 6-10.1186/1742-5581-2-6. Banks MA: The excitement of Google Scholar, the worry of Google Print. Biomed Digit Libr. 2005, 2: 2-10.1186/1742-5581-2-2. Errors in citation statistics. Nature. 2002, 415: 101-10.1038/415101a. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001, 409: 860-921. 10.1038/35057062. Science Watch. [http://www.sciencewatch.com/]- Gehanno JF, Darmoni SJ, Caillard JF: Major inaccuracies in articles citing occupational or environmental medicine papers and their implications. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005, 93: 118-121. Opthof T, Coronel R, Piper HM: Impact factors: no totum pro parte by skewness of citation. Cardiovasc Res. 2004, 61: 201-203. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.11.023. Not-so-deep impact. Nature. 2005, 435: 1003-1004. 10.1038/4351003a. Pfeifer MP, Snodgrass GL: The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature. JAMA. 1990, 263: 1420-1423. 10.1001/jama.263.10.1420. Kochan CA, Budd JM: The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1992, 43: 488-493. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199208)43:7<488::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-7. Budd JM, Sievert ME, Schultz TR: Phenomena of Retraction: Reasons for Retraction and Citations to the Publications. JAMA. 1998, 280: 296-297. 10.1001/jama.280.3.296. Brumfiel G: Misconduct findings at Bell Labs shakes physics community. Nature. 2002, 419: 419-421. Smith R: Journal accused of manipulating impact factor. Bmj. 1997, 314: 463- Neuberger J, Counsell C: Impact factors: uses and abuses. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002, 14: 209-211. 10.1097/00042737-200203000-00001. Sevinc A: Manipulating impact factor: an unethical issue or an Editor's choice?. Swiss Med Wkly. 2004, 134: 410- Asai I: Adjusted age distribution and its application to impact factor and immediacy index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1981, 32: 172-174. Glänzel W, Schoepflin U: A bibliometric study on aging and reception processes of scientific literature. Journal of Information Science. 1995, 21: 37-53. Sombatsompop N, Markpin T, Premkamolnetr N: A modified method for calculating the Impact Factors of journals in ISI Journal Citation Reports: Polymer Science Category in 1997-2001. Scientometrics. 2004, 60: 217-235. 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027794.98854.f6. Rousseau R: Median and percentile impact factors: A set of new indicators. Scientometrics. 2005, 63: 431-441. 10.1007/s11192-005-0223-1. Hirst G: Discipline impact factor: a method for determining core journal lists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1978, 29: 171-172. Pudovkin AI, Garfield E: Rank-normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories. 2004, 41: 507-515. Ramírez AM, García EO, Río JAD: Renormalized impact factor. Scientometrics. 2000, 47: 3-9. 10.1023/A:1005600807292. Sombatsompop N, Markpin T, Yochai W, Saechiew M: An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using Impact Factor Point Average (IFPA) index: Thailand case study. Scientometrics. 2005, 65: 293-305. 10.1007/s11192-005-0275-2. Sombatsompop N, Markpin T: Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2005, 56: 676-683. 10.1002/asi.20150. Hofbauer R, Frass M, Gmeiner B, Kaye AD: Euro-Factor - The new european scientific currency. 2002, Vienna, VICER Publishing VICER. [http://www.vicer.org/]- Walter G, Bloch S, Hunt G, Fisher K: Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality. Med J Aust. 2003, 178: 280-281. Jacsó P: The mirage of prestige. [http://www2.hawaii.edu/~jacso/extra/infotoday/prestige/mirage-prestige.htm]. Garfield E: How can impact factors be improved?. Bmj. 1996, 313: 411-413. US Preventive Services Task Force. [http://odphp.osophs.dhhs.gov/pubs/guidecps/]- Nakayama T, Fukui T: Comparison between impact factors and citations in Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines. 2005 Berghmans T, Meert AP, Mascaux C, Paesmans M, Lafitte JJ, Sculier JP: Citation indexes do not reflect methodological quality in lung cancer randomised trials. Ann Oncol. 2003, 14: 715-721. 10.1093/annonc/mdg203. Rowland F: Two large-scale surveys of electronic publication in the United Kingdom. 1999, 131-136. Swan A, Brown S: 'What authors want' Report of the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals. Learned Publishing. 1999, 12: 74-10.1087/09531519950145878. Mabe MA: An overview of existing user behaviour research. 2004, in www.alpsp.org/events/previous/mab040703.ppt- Garfield E: Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972, 178: 471-479.