Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews

Vessey, 2002, Research in information systems: an empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals, J. Manage. Inf. Syst., 19, 129, 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045721

King, 2005, Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 16, 665

Bandara, 2011, A systematic, tool-supported method for conducting literature reviews in information systems, 13

Hunter, 1982

Cooper, 1988, Organizing knowledge syntheses: a taxonomy of literature reviews, Knowl. Soc., 1, 104

Mulrow, 1994, Rationale for systematic reviews, Br. Med. J., 3

Hart, 1999

Leedy, 2001

Pfeffer, 2006, Evidence-based management, Harv. Bus. Rev., 84, 62

Green, 2006, Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade, J. Chiropr. Med., 5, 101, 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6

Webster, 2002, Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review, MIS Quart., 26, xiii

Levy, 2006, A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research, Inf. Sci., 9, 181

vom Brocke, 2009, Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process

Okoli, 2010, A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research, Sprouts: Work. Papers Inf. Syst., 10, 1

Baker, 2000, Writing a literature review, Market. Rev., 1, 219, 10.1362/1469347002529189

Mulrow, 1987, The medical review article: state of the science, Ann. Intern. Med., 106, 485, 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485

Watson, 2001, Introducing MISQ review – a new department in MIS Quarterly, MIS Quart., 25, 103

Markus, 2007, Looking for a few good concepts and theories for the information systems field, MIS Quart., 31, iii, 10.2307/25148777

1994, vol. 102

Smith, 2002, Typologies, taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification, Policy Stud. J., 30, 379, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2002.tb02153.x

Blalock, 1969

Doty, 1994, Typologies as a unique form of theory building: towards improved understanding and modelling, Acad. Manage. Rev., 19, 230, 10.5465/amr.1994.9410210748

Chalmers, 2002, A brief history of research synthesis, Eval. Health Prof., 25, 12, 10.1177/0163278702025001003

Cooper, 1994

Light, 1984

Glass, 1976, Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research, Educ. Res., 10, 3, 10.3102/0013189X005010003

Jackson, 1980, Methods for integrative reviews, Rev. Educ. Res., 50, 438, 10.3102/00346543050003438

Pillemer, 1984, Conceptual issues in research synthesis, J. Spec. Educ., 18, 27, 10.1177/002246698401800105

Oxman, 1988, Guidelines for reading literature reviews, Can. Med. Assoc. J., 138, 697

Dixon-Woods, 2005, Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods, J. Health Serv. Res. Policy, 10, 45B, 10.1258/1355819052801804

Tricco, 2011, The art and science of knowledge synthesis, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 64, 11, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.007

Dijkers, 2009, The task force on systematic reviews and guidelines: the value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 88, 423, 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31819c59c6

Borenstein, 2011

Grant, 2009, A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies, Health Inf. Libr. J., 26, 91, 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Card, 2012

Cook, 1997, Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions, Ann. Intern. Med., 126, 376, 10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006

Davies, 2000, The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice, Oxf. Rev. Educ., 26, 365, 10.1080/713688543

Dixon-Woods, 2006, How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective, Qual. Res., 6, 27, 10.1177/1468794106058867

Gough, 2012, Clarifying differences between review designs and methods, Syst. Rev., 1, 28, 10.1186/2046-4053-1-28

Kirkevold, 1997, Integrative nursing research – an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice, J. Adv. Nurs., 25, 977, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025977.x

Kitchenham, 2009, Evidence-based software engineering and systematic literature reviews, Eur. J. Inf. Prof., 9, 34

Kitchenham, 2011, Using mapping studies as the basis for further research – a participant–observer case study, Inf. Softw. Technol., 53, 638, 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.011

Rousseau, 2008, 11 Evidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses, Acad. Manage. Ann., 2, 475, 10.1080/19416520802211651

Rumrill, 2010, Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature, Work J. Prev. Assess. Rehabil., 35, 399

Whittemore, 2005, Combining evidence in nursing research: methods and implications, Nurs. Res., 54, 56, 10.1097/00006199-200501000-00008

Arksey, 2005, Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework, Int. J. Soc. Res. Method., 8, 19, 10.1080/1364557032000119616

Becker, 2008, 607

Daudt, 2013, Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O’Malley's framework, BMC Med. Res. Method., 13, 48, 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48

Gmür, 2003, Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: a methodological evaluation, Scientometrics, 57, 27, 10.1023/A:1023619503005

Hammersley, 2001, On ‘systematic’ reviews of research literatures: a ‘narrative’ response to Evans & Benefield, Br. Educ. Res. J., 27, 543, 10.1080/01411920120095726

2008, Front matter

Levac, 2010, Scoping studies: advancing the methodology, Implement. Sci., 5, 69, 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Noblit, 1988

Oates, 2012, A model-driven method for the systematic literature review of qualitative empirical research

Pawson, 2005, Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions, J. Health Serv. Res. Policy, 10, 21, 10.1258/1355819054308530

Pieper, 2012, Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 65, 1267, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.015

Rosenthal, 2001, Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 52, 59, 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59

Saunders, 2003, Lessons from the trenches of metatriangulation research, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 11

Shepperd, 2009, Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions?, PLoS Med., 6, e1000086, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000086

Smith, 2011, Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions, BMC Med. Res. Method., 11, 15, 10.1186/1471-2288-11-15

Thomas, 2008, Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews, BMC Med. Res. Method., 8, 45, 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Wong, 2013, RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses, BMC Med., 11, 21, 10.1186/1741-7015-11-21

Grimshaw, 2010

Cronin, 2008, Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach, Br. J. Nurs., 17, 38, 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059

Williams, 1998, The pitfalls of narrative reviews in clinical medicine, Ann. Oncol., 9, 601, 10.1023/A:1008299304900

Brien, 2010, Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards, Implement. Sci., 5, 2, 10.1186/1748-5908-5-2

Bryman, 2001

Anderson, 2008, Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services, Health Res. Policy Syst., 6, 7, 10.1186/1478-4505-6-7

Deeks, 2008, Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses, 243

Popay, 2006

Rodgers, 2009, Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: effectiveness of interventions to promote smoke alarm ownership and function, Evaluation, 15, 49, 10.1177/1356389008097871

Hedges, 1980, Vote-counting methods in research synthesis, Psychol. Bull., 88, 359, 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.359

Noyes, 2008, Qualitative research and cochrane reviews

Hartling, 2012, A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2011, PLOS ONE, 7, e49667, 10.1371/journal.pone.0049667

Bastian, 2010, Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?, PLoS Med., 7, e1000326, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326

Jadad, 1997, A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews, Can. Med. Assoc. J., 156, 1411

Thomson, 2010, The evolution of a new publication type: steps and challenges of producing overviews of reviews, Res. Synth. Methods, 1, 198, 10.1002/jrsm.30

Ernst, 2002, A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 54, 577, 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01699.x

Seida, 2009, Systematic reviews of psychosocial interventions for autism: an umbrella review, Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 51, 95, 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03211.x

Shea, 2009, AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 62, 1013, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009

Atkins, 2004, Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, BMJ Clin. Res., 328, 1490, 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490

Baumeister, 1997, Writing narrative literature reviews, Rev. Gen. Psychol., 1, 311, 10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311

Eakin, 2003, Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences, J. Eval. Clin. Pract., 9, 187, 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00392.x

Sandelowski, 2003, Classifying the findings in qualitative research, Qual. Health Res., 13, 905, 10.1177/1049732303253488

Wolfswinkel, 2013, Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature, Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 22, 45, 10.1057/ejis.2011.51

Greenhalgh, 2011, Protocol-realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES), BMC Med. Res. Method., 11, 115, 10.1186/1471-2288-11-115

Oates, 2011, Evidence-based information systems: a decade later

Pawson, 2006

Orlikowski, 1993, CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development, MIS Quart., 17, 309, 10.2307/249774

Pawson, 2005, Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions, J. Health Serv. Res. Policy, 10, 21, 10.1258/1355819054308530

Barnett-Page, 2009, Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review, BMC Med. Res. Method., 9, 59, 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59

Pearson, 2004, Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews, JBI Rep., 2, 45, 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2004.00008.x

2006

Cooper, 2009, Research synthesis as a scientific process, Handb. Res. Synth. Meta-analysis, 2, 3

Kitsiou, 2013, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: a critical assessment of their methodological quality, J. Med. Internet Res., 15, e150, 10.2196/jmir.2770

Aloini, 2007, Risk management in ERP project introduction: Review of the literature, Inf. Manage., 44, 547, 10.1016/j.im.2007.05.004

Palvia, 2004, Research methodologies in MIS: an update, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 14, 526

Archer, 2011, Personal health records: a scoping review, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 18, 515, 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000105

Schepers, 2007, A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects, Inf. Manage., 44, 90, 10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007

Paré, 2007, Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: the evidence base, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 14, 269, 10.1197/jamia.M2270

Mbemba, 2013, Interventions for supporting nurse retention in rural and remote areas: an umbrella review, Hum. Resour. Health, 11, 44, 10.1186/1478-4491-11-44

DeLone, 1992, Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable, Inf. Syst. Res., 3, 60, 10.1287/isre.3.1.60

Wong, 2010, Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances, BMC Med. Educ., 10, 12, 10.1186/1472-6920-10-12

Davis, 1989, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Manage. Sci., 35, 982, 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Laurillard, 2002

Balijepally, 2011, Are we wielding this hammer correctly?. a reflective review of the application of cluster analysis in information systems research, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 12, 375

Dubé, 2003, Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations, MIS Quart., 24, 597, 10.2307/30036550

Patsopoulos, 2005, Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 293, 2362, 10.1001/jama.293.19.2362

Montori, 2003, Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts, BMC Med., 1, 2, 10.1186/1741-7015-1-2

Petticrew, 2006

Benbasat, 1987, The case research strategy in studies of information systems, MIS Quart., 11, 369, 10.2307/248684

Alavi, 2001, Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quart., 25, 107, 10.2307/3250961

Orlikowski, 1991, Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions, Inf. Syst. Res., 2, 1, 10.1287/isre.2.1.1

Wade, 2004, Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research, MIS Quart., 28, 107, 10.2307/25148626

Briner, 2009, Evidence-based management: concept cleanup time?, Acad. Manage. Perspect., 23, 19, 10.5465/AMP.2009.45590138

Whetten, 1989, What constitutes a theoretical contribution?, Acad. Manage. Rev., 14, 490, 10.5465/AMR.1989.4308371

Keen, 1980, Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition, 9

Benbasat, 1999, Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance, MIS Quart., 23, 3, 10.2307/249403