Synergistic engine-fuel technologies for light-duty vehicles: Fuel economy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Ikeya, 2015, Thermal efficiency enhancement of a gasoline engine, SAE Int J Engines, 8, 1579, 10.4271/2015-01-1263 Johnson, 2016, Vehicular emissions in review, SAE Int J Engines, 9, 10.4271/2016-01-0919 Waqas M, Naser N, Sarathy M, Feijs J, Morganti K, Johansson B. Autoignition of iso-stoichiometric blends of Gasoline-Ethanol-Methanol (GEM) in SI, HCCI and CI combustion modes. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0726. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0726. Kalghatgi, 2017, On knock intensity and superknock in SI engines, SAE Int J Engines, 10, 10.4271/2017-01-0689 Kalghatgi G, Morganti K, Algunaibet I. Some insights on the stochastic nature of knock and the evolution of hot spots in the end-gas during the engine cycle from experimental measurements of knock onset and knock intensity. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2233. Theiss T, Alleman T, Brooker A, Elgowainy A, Fioroni G, Han J, et al., Summary of high-octane mid-level ethanol blends study, Tech. Rep. ORNL/TM-2016/42, Bioenergy Technologies Program (July 2016). <http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/1286966>. Kalghatgi G, Morganti K, Algunaibet I, Sarathy M, Dibble R. Knock prediction using a simple model for ignition delay. SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0702. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0702. Leone, 2015, The effect of compression ratio, fuel octane rating, and ethanol content on spark-ignition engine efficiency, Environ Sci Technol, 49, 10778, 10.1021/acs.est.5b01420 Foong, 2014, The octane numbers of ethanol blended with gasoline and its surrogates, Fuel, 115, 727, 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.105 Waqas, 2016, Blending octane number of ethanol in HCCI, SI and CI combustion modes, SAE Int J Fuels Lubr, 9, 659, 10.4271/2016-01-2298 Wang, 2017, Ethanol blends in spark ignition engines: RON, octane-added value, cooling effect, compression ratio, and potential engine efficiency gain, Appl Energy, 191, 603, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.081 Turner, 2013, Extending the role of alcohols as transport fuels using iso-stoichiometric ternary blends of gasoline, ethanol and methanol, Appl Energy, 102, 72, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.07.044 Lanzanova, 2016, Performance and economic analysis of a direct injection spark ignition engine fueled with wet ethanol, Appl Energy, 169, 230, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.016 Waqas M, Morganti K, Masurier J, Johansson B. Blending octane number of ethanol on a volume and molar basis in SI and HCCI combustion modes. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2256; 2017. Morganti K, Abdullah M, Alzubail A, Viollet Y, Head R, Chang J, et al. Improving the efficiency of conventional spark-ignition engines using octane-on-demand combustion. Part I: Engine studies. SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0679, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0679. Chow E, Heywood J, Speth R. Benefits of a higher octane standard gasoline for the U.S. light-duty vehicle fleet. SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1961, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-1961. Speth, 2014, Economic and environmental benefits of higher-octane gasoline, Environ Sci Technol, 48, 6561, 10.1021/es405557p Morganti K, Alzubail A, Abdullah M, Viollet Y, Head R, Chang J, et al., Improving the efficiency of conventional spark-ignition engines using octane-on-demand combustion – Part II: Vehicle studies and life cycle assessment. SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0683, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0683. Huang, 2015, Investigation to charge cooling effect and combustion characteristics of ethanol direct injection in a gasoline port injection engine, Appl Energy, 160, 244, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.059 Daniel, 2013, Gaseous and particulate matter emissions of biofuel blends in dual-injection compared to direct-injection and port injection, Appl Energy, 105, 252, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.020 Wu, 2016, Dual-injection: the flexible, bi-fuel concept for spark-ignition engines fuelled with various gasoline and biofuel blends, Appl Energy, 88, 2305, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.025 Morganti, 2017, Maximizing the benefits of high octane fuels in spark-ignition engines, Fuel, 207, 470, 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.066 Clairotte, 2013, Effects of low temperature on the cold start gaseous emissions from light duty vehicles fuelled by ethanol-blended gasoline, Appl Energy, 102, 44, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.010 Foong, 2013, The effect of charge cooling on the RON of ethanol/gasoline blends, SAE Int J Fuels Lubr, 6, 34, 10.4271/2013-01-0886 Zeng, 2016, Greenhouse gas emissions of motor vehicles in Chinese cities and the implication for China‘s mitigation targets, Appl Energy, 184, 1016, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.130 Collet, 2015, Recommendations for Life Cycle Assessment of algal fuels, Appl Energy, 154, 1089, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.056 Singh, 2010, Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and perspectives, Bioresource Technol, 101, 5003, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.062 Han J, Elgowainy A, Wang M, DiVita V. Well-to-Wheels Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis of High-Octane Fuels with Various Market Shares and Ethanol Blending Levels, Tech. rep., Argonne National Laboratory, Report ANL/ESD-15/10. Energy Systems Division, Argonne, IL; 2015. Hirshfeld, 2014, Refining economics of U.S. gasoline: octane ratings and ethanol content, Environ Sci Technol, 48, 11064, 10.1021/es5021668 Zhang, 2016, Lifecycle optimized ethanol-gasoline blends for turbocharged engines, Appl Energy, 181, 38, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.052 Anderson J, Duesterhoeft L, Iqbal A, Leone T, Studzinski B. Refinery study and well-to-wheels analysis of higher octane ratings for U.S. gasoline. Presented at 2015 CRC life cycle analysis of transportation fuels workshop, 26–28 October 2015, Chicago, IL; 2015. Ding, 2017, Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol produced from soluble sugar in sweet sorghum stalks in North China, J Cleaner Prod, 161, 335, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.078 Orsi, 2016, A multi-dimensional well-to-wheels analysis of passenger vehicles in different regions: Primary energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic cost, Appl Energy, 169, 197, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.039 Suarez-Bertoa, 2015, Impact of ethanol containing gasoline blends on emissions from a flex-fuel vehicle tested over the Worldwide Harmonized Light duty Test Cycle (WLTC), Fuel, 143, 173, 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.076 Wang, 2012, Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use, Environ Res Lett, 7, 045905, 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045905 Luo, 2009, Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 13, 1613, 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.024 Daylan, 2016, Life cycle assessment and environmental life cycle costing analysis of lignocellulosic bioethanol as an alternative transportation fuel, Renewable Energy, 89, 578, 10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.059 Elgowainy A, Dieffenthaler D, Sokolov V, Sabbisetti R. The Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation Model (GREET) v1.3.0.13081. IL, USA: Transportation Technology R&D Center, Argonne National Laboratory; (2016). Foong, 2017, Modelling end-gas autoignition of ethanol/gasoline surrogate blends in the cooperative fuel research engine, Energy Fuels, 31, 2378, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02380 Iodice, 2016, Effect of ethanol-gasoline blends on CO and HC emissions in last generation SI engines within the cold-start transient: an experimental investigation, Appl Energy, 179, 182, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.144 Cho S, Kim N, Chung J, Min K. The effect of ethanol injection strategy on knock suppression of the gasoline/ethanol dual fuel combustion in a spark-ignited engine. SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0764, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0764. Wang, 2015, Evaluation on toxic reduction and fuel economy of a gasoline direct injection- (GDI-) powered passenger car fueled with methanol-gasoline blends with various substitution ratios, Appl Energy, 157, 134, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.023 Agarwal, 2015, Unregulated emissions from a gasohol (E5, E15, M5, and M15) fuelled spark ignition engine, Appl Energy, 154, 732, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.052 Costagliola, 2013, Combustion efficiency and engine out emissions of a S.I. engine fueled with alcohol/gasoline blends, Appl Energy, 111, 1162, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.042 Yang, 2012, Effects of ethanol-blended gasoline on emissions of regulated air pollutants and carbonyls from motorcycles, Appl Energy, 89, 281, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.07.035 Balat, 2009, Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel, Appl Energy, 86, 2273, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.015 Jo, 2016, Optimal use of ethanol in dual fuel applications: effects of engine downsizing, spark retard, and compression ratio on fuel economy, SAE Int J Engines, 9, 1087, 10.4271/2016-01-0786 Jung, 2013, Fuel economy and CO2 emissions of ethanol-gasoline blends in a turbocharged DI engine, SAE Int J Engines, 6, 422, 10.4271/2013-01-1321 Nozawa, 1994, Effects of engine downsizing on friction losses and fuel economy, Tribibol Int, 27, 31, 10.1016/0301-679X(94)90060-4 Thomas, 1984, Medium-speed diesel engines: Part I-Design trends and the use of residual/blended fuels, J Eng Gas Turbines Power, 106, 860, 10.1115/1.3239651 Markel, 2002, ADVISOR: a systems analysis tool for advanced vehicle modeling, J Power Sources, 110, 255, 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00189-1 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), Geneva, Switzerland; 2007. Argonne National Laboratory. GREET Life Cycle Model User Guide, Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division, Argonne, IL; 2016. <https://greet.es.anl.gov/publication-greet-manual>. US Environmental Protection Agency. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2): Final Rule Additional Resources, EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161, Washington, DC; 2010. <https://www.epa.gov/renewable-fuel-standard-program/renewable-fuel-standard-rfs2-final-rule-additional-resources>. Boland S, Unnasch S. Carbon intensity of marginal petroleum and corn ethanol fuels, Tech. Rep. LCA 6075.83.2014, Life Cycle Associates. Air Improvement Resource Inc. A Comparison of Corn Ethanol Lifecycle Analyses: California Low Carbon Fuels Standard (LCFS) Versus Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS2), June 14, Novi, MI; 2010. US Environmental Protection Agency. Framework for Assessing Biogenic CO2 Emissions from Stationary Sources, Washington, DC; 2014. <https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-08/documents/framework-for-assessing-biogenic-co2-emissions.pdf>. Bala, 1998 Chang, 2017, Environmental impact and sustainability study on biofuels for transportation applications, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 67, 277, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.020 Wallington T, Anderson J, De Kleine R, Kim H, Maas H, Brandt A, et al. When comparing alternative fuel-vehicle systems, life cycle assessment studies should consider trends in oil production. J Ind Ecol. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12418. Hao, 2017, Coal-derived alternative fuels for vehicle use in China: a review, J Clean Prod, 141, 774, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.137 DeCicco, 2016, Carbon balance effects of U.S. biofuel production and use, Clim Change, 138, 667, 10.1007/s10584-016-1764-4 US Environmental Protection Agency. Accounting Framework for Biogenic CO2 Emissions from Stationary Sources, Washington, DC; September 2011. Brinkman N, Wang M, Weber T, Darlington T. Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems - A North American Study of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Criteria Pollutant Emissions; May 2005. Stein, 2009, Optimal use of E85 in a turbocharged direct injection engine, SAE Int J Fuels Lubr, 2, 670, 10.4271/2009-01-1490