Chye, S., Valappil, A. C., Wright, D. J., Frank, C., Shearer, D. A., Tyler, C. J., Diss, C. E., Mian, O. S., Tillin, N. A., & Bruton, A. M. (2022). The effects of combined action observation and motor imagery on corticospinal excitability and movement outcomes: Two meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 143, 104911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104911
Eaves, D. L., Hodges, N. J., Buckingham, G., Buccino, G., & Vogt, S. (2022). Enhancing motor imagery practice using synchronous action observation. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01768-7
Frank, C., Wright, D. J., & Holmes, P. S. (2020). Mental simulation and neurocognition: Advances for motor imagery and action observation training in sport. In D. Hackfort & R. J. Schinke (Eds.), The Routledge International Encyclopedia of Sport and Exercise Psychology: Volume 2 Applied and Practical Measures (1st ed., pp. 411–428). Routledge.
Holmes, P., & Calmels, C. (2008). A neuroscientific review of imagery and action observation use in sport. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40(5), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.5.433-445
Marshall, B., & Wright, D. J. (2016). Layered stimulus response training versus combined action observation and motor imagery: Effects of golf putting performance and imagery ability characteristics. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 11(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/jirspa-2016-0007
McNeill, E., Toth, A. J., Harrison, A. J., & Campbell, M. J. (2020). Cognitive to physical performance. A conceptual model for the role of motor simulation in performance. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(1), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2019.1689573
Meers, R., Nuttall, H. E., & Vogt, S. (2020). Motor imagery alone drives corticospinal excitability during concurrent action observation and motor imagery. Cortex, 126, 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.012
Romano-Smith, S., Wood, G., Wright, D. J., & Wakefield, C. J. (2018). Simultaneous and alternate action observation and motor imagery combinations improve aiming performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 38, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.06.003
Scott, M. W., Wood, G., Holmes, P. S., Marshall, B., Williams, J., & Wright, D. J. (2023). Combined action observation and motor imagery improves learning of activities of daily living in children with developmental coordination disorder. PLoS One, 18(5), e0284086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284086
Scott, M. W., Wright, D. J., Smith, D., & Holmes, P. S. (2022). Twenty years of PETTLEP imagery: An update and new direction for simulation-based training. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsep.2022.07.002
Smith, D., Romano-Smith, S., Wright, D. J., Deller-Rust, B., & Wakefield, C. J. (2020). The effects of combining PETTLEP imagery and action observation on bicep strength: A single-case design. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 32(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2018.1560372
Taube, W., Lorch, M., Zeiter, S., & Keller, M. (2014). Non-physical practice improves task performance in an unstable, perturbed environment: Motor imagery and observational balance training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00972
Vogt, S., Di Rienzo, F., Collet, C., Collins, A., & Guillot, A. (2013). Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 807. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00807
Wright, D. J., Frank, C., & Bruton, A. M. (2022). Recommendations for combining action observation and motor imagery interventions in sport. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 13(3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2021.1971810