Chuyển điểm nhìn trong các mô hình tâm lý không gian

Memory and Cognition - Tập 20 - Trang 507-518 - 1992
Nancy Franklin1, Barbara Tversky2, Vicky Coon3
1Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Stony Brook
2Stanford University, Stanford
3 Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta;

Tóm tắt

Trong sáu thí nghiệm, các đối tượng tham gia đã đọc các câu chuyện mô tả những cảnh không gian khác nhau với nhiều điểm nhìn. Họ đã được hỏi về các đối tượng nằm ở sáu hướng khác nhau từ quan điểm của từng nhân vật. Thời gian phản ứng của các đối tượng tương thích với quy tắc một nơi - một quan điểm. Họ dường như hình thành các mô hình tâm lý riêng biệt cho từng địa điểm và tiếp nhận quan điểm của một nhân vật khi chỉ có một nhân vật liên quan trong cảnh, nhưng họ dường như tiếp nhận một quan điểm trung lập khi có nhiều điểm nhìn được tham chiếu, thay vì chuyển đổi quan điểm.

Từ khóa

#mô hình tâm lý không gian #điểm nhìn #quan điểm #thí nghiệm tâm lý học #thời gian phản ứng.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abelson, R. (1979). Does a story understander need a point of view? In R. Schank & B. L. Nash-Webber (Eds.),Theoretical issues in natural language processing (pp. 154–156). Washington, DC: Association for Computational Linguistics. Black, J., Turner, T., &Bower, G. (1979). Point of view in narrative comprehension, memory, and production.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 187–198. Bly, B. (1988).Perspective in mental models of test. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Department of Psychology. Bransford, J., Barclay, J., &Franks, J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach.Cognitive Psychology,3, 193–209. Bryant, D. J., & Tversky, B. (1991, November).Locating objects from memory or from sight. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco. Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., &Franklin, N. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing text.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 74–98. Carroll, J. M., Thomas, J. C., &Malhotra, A. (1980). Presentation and representation in design problem solving.British Journal of Psychology,71, 143–153. Clark, E. V. (1972). On the child’s acquisition of antonyms in two semantic fields.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 750–758. Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press. Clark, H. H., &Clark, E. V. (1977).Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Cooper, L., &Shepard, R. N. (1975). Mental transformations in the identification of left and right hands.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,104, 48–56. Corballis, M., &Beale, I. (1976).The psychology of left and right. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Delancey, S. (1982). Aspect, transitivity and viewpoint. In P. J. Hopper (Ed.),Tense-aspect: Between semantics & pragmatics (pp. 167–183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Denis, M., &Cocude, M. (1989). Scanning visual images generated from verbal descriptions.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,1, 293–307. De Vega, M. (1991).Change of character and change of perspective in narratives describing spatial environments. Unpublished manuscript, University of La Laguna, Department of Psychology, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. Ellis, N. R. (1990). Is memory for spatial location automatically encoded?Memory & Cognition,18, 584–592. Farrell, W. S. (1979). Coding left and right.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 42–51. Fillmore, C. J. (1975).Santa Cruz lectures on deixis. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Franklin, N., &Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 63–76. Garnham, A. (1989). A unified theory of the meaning of some spatial relational terms.Cognition,31, 45–60. Glenberg, A., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension,Journal of Memory & Language,26, 69–83. Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,108, 356–388. Levelt, W. J. M. (1984). Some perceptual limitations on talking about space. In A. I. van Doom, W. A. van der Grind, & J. J. Koenderink (Eds.),Limits on perception (pp. 323–358). Utrecht: VNU Science Press. Levine, M., Jankovic, I., &Palij, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111, 157–175. Maki, R. H., &Braine, L. G. (1985). The role of verbal label sin the judgment of orientation and location.Perception,14, 67–80. Maki, R. H., Grandy, C., &Hauge, G. (1979). Why is telling right from left more difficult than telling above from below?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 52–67. Mandler, J. M., Seegmiller, D., &Day, J. (1977). On the coding of spatial information.Memory & Cognition,5, 10–16. Mani, K., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions.Memory & Cognition,10, 181–187. Marr, D., &Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,200, 269–291. Miller, G. A., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976).Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Morrow, D. G. (1985a). Prepositions and verb aspect in narrative understanding.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 390–404. Morrow, D. G. (1985b). Prominent characters and events organize narrative understanding.Journal of Memory& Language,24, 304–319. Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., &Greenspan, S. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 292–312. Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S., &Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 165–187. Naveh-benjamin, M. (1988). Recognition memory of spatial location information: Another failure to support automaticity.Memory& Cognition,16, 437–445. Novick, L. R., &Tversky, B. (1987). Cognitive constraints on ordering operations: The case of geometric analogies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 50–67. Parsons, L. (1987a). Imagined spatial transformation of one’s body.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 172–191. Parsons, L. (1987b). Imagined spatial transformation of one’s hands.Cognitive Psychology,19, 178–241. Perrig, W., &Kintsch, W. (1985). Propositional and situational representation of text.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 503–518. Pinker, S. (1984). Visual cognition: An introduction.Cognition,18, 1–63. Radvansky, G. A., &Zacks, R. T. (1991). Mental models and fact retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 940–953. Shepard, R. N. (1981). Psychophysical complementarity. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 279–341). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Shepard, R. N., &Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps.Cognition,18, 161–194. Sholl, M. J., &Egeth, H. E. (1981). Right-left confusion in the adult: A verbal labeling effect.Memory & Cognition,9, 339–350. Stark, H. (1986).Keeping track of characters in narrative. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University. Taylor, H. A., &Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 261–292. Tversky, B., &Hemenway, K. (1983). Categories of environmental scenes.Cognitive Psychology,15, 121–149. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition.Cognition,32, 193–254. Van Duk, T., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press. Wallace, S. (1982). Figure and group: The interrelationships of linguistic categories. In P. J. Hopper (Ed.),Tense-aspect: Between semantics & pragmatics (pp. 201–223). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.