Switching costs and consumer behaviour: implications for telecommunications regulation

Emerald - 2008
PatrickXavier1, DimitriYpsilanti2
1Faculty of Business, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne
2Head, Telecommunications Policy Section, OECD, Paris

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper aims to examine the extent to which telecommunications consumers decide to switch and why.Design/methodology/approachResults from surveys of consumer switching behaviour in a number of countries are examined to ascertain reasons for actual consumer decision making regarding switching.FindingsImplications for telecommunications regulation are considered. In essence, regulation should require that communications service providers ensure that switching is fast, cheap, predictable and reliable and that consumers are able to switch with minimum difficulty and delay.Practical implicationsThe ability and willingness to switch from one to another supplier of telecommunications and internet services are an important aspect in manifesting consumer empowerment. In turn, empowered consumers are important for sustainable competition. If consumers are inert and passive, suppliers will not be under pressure to deliver the potential benefits of competition. And it is empowered assertive consumers, able and willing to switch, who will exert pressure on suppliers to deliver these benefits. Thus, in making well‐informed choices between suppliers, consumers not only benefit from competition but also initiate and sustain it.Originality/valueInsights from behavioural economics are incorporated in the analysis.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anacom (2006), Electronic Communications Consumer Survey, February 2006 – Key Findings, May.

Analysys (2006), Mobile Number Portability: Strategies for Operators and Regulators, December, available at: http://research.analysys.com.

Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) (2006), Telecommunications Performance Report 2005‐2006, Australian Communications and Media Authority, Belconnen, October.

Australian Communications Authority (ACA) (2004), Consumer Satisfaction Survey, Australian Communications Authority, Belconnen, August.

Barrow, P. (2007), “Just enough: empowering fixed‐line telecommunications consumers through a quality of service information system” CCP Working Paper 07‐2, available at: www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP07‐2.pdf.

CALPIRG Education Fund (California Public Interest Research Group) (2005), Locked in a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Termination Fees Hurt Consumers, August.

Economist (2007), “Japanese Telecoms: change is in the air” (number portability has boosted competition in mobile telecoms)”, The Economist, 20 January.

European Commission (2006), Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Review of the EU Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communication Networks and Services{COM(2006)334 final} – Proposed Changes, Staff Working Document, Brussels, 28 June, SEC(2006) 816.

Gans, J. (2005), “Real consumers and Telco choice: the road to confusopoly”, paper presented at the Australian Telecommunications Summit, Sydney, 21 November.

National Economic Research Associates (2003), “Switching costs: a report prepared for the Office of Fair Trading and the Department of Trade and Industry”, Economic Discussion Paper No. 5, April.

Ofcom (2006a), “Consumer experience research” Annex 4, Consumer Decision‐Making in the Telecoms Market, Report on research findings, Research Annex, 16 November.

Ofcom (2006b), Broadband Migrations: Enabling Consumer Choice, 13 December.

Ofcom (2007a), Protecting Consumers from Mis‐selling of Telecommunications Services, Consultation Document, 8 February.

Ofcom (2007b), The Consumer Experience – Telecoms, Internet and Digital Broadcasting. Policy Evaluation, November.

Swedish National Post and Telecom Agency (2005), Swedish Telecommunications Market 2005, July.

UK National NCC (2006), Switched on to switching? A survey of Consumer Behaviour and Attitudes, 2001 Consumers Council, April.

Wilson, C.M. and Waddams‐Price, C. (2005), Irrationality in Consumer Switching Decisions: When More Firms May Mean Less Consumer Benefit, Industrial Organization, 0509010 EconWPA.

Australian Communications Authority (ACA) (2001), Monitoring and Reporting on Quality of Service, Australian Communications Authority, Belconnen, December.

Australian Communications Authority (ACA) (2002), Telecommunications Performance Report 2001‐2002, Australian Communications Authority, Belconnen, November.

Australian Communications Authority (ACA) (2004), Understanding Your Broadband Quality of Service, Australian Communications Authority, Belconnen, November.

Bar‐Gill, O. (2006), “Bundling and consumer misperception”, The University of Chicago Law Review, January.

Better Regulation Executive (2007), Government Response to the Final Better Regulation Executive/National Consumer Council Report on Consumer Information, UK Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, London, November.

Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'donoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (2003), “Regulation for conservatives: behavioural economics and the case for asymmetric paternalism”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 151, pp. 1211‐54.

Canadian Telecommunications Policy Review (2006), Final report 2006, Canadian Telecommunications Policy Review, Ottawa.

Department of Trade and Industry (2003), “Switching costs” Economic Discussion Paper No. 5, report prepared for the Office of Fair Trading and the Department of Trade and Industry by National Economic Research Associates, April.

Milne, R. (2006), “ICT quality of service regulation: practices and proposals”, paper presented at the ITU Global Seminar on Quality of Service and Consumer Protection, Geneva, Switzerland, 31 August‐1 September.

OECD (2005), Guiding Principles on Regulatory Quality and Performance, OECD, Paris.

OECD (2006), Roundtable on Demand‐Side Economics for Consumer Policy: Summary Report, OECD, Paris, available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/31/46/36581073.pdf.

OECD (2007), Summary Report on the 2nd OECD Roundtable on Consumer Policy, OECD, Paris.

Ofcom (2006a), Ofcom's Consumer Policy – A Consultation, 8 February, London, available at: www.ofcom.org/consult/condocs/ocp/ocp_web.pdf.

Ofcom (2006b), The Communications Market 2006, August.

Ofcom (2007), Ofcom's Consumer Policy: A Consultation, 8 February, London.

Public Interest Research Group (Illinois PIRG) (2005), Can You Hear Us Now? A Report on How the Cell Phone Industry has failed Consumers, March, available at: www.illinoispirg.org/reports/canyouhearusnow.pdf.

Sylvan, L. (2006), “The interface between consumer policy and competition policy”, Lecture in honour of Professor Maureen Brunt, Department of Consumer Affairs, Melbourne.

UK National Consumers Council (2005), NCC's response to Ofcom's Consultation Strategic review of Telecommunications: Phase 2, February, available at: www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/telecoms_p2/restsrp2/ncc.pdf.

UK Office of Telecommunications (Oftel) (2001), Effective Competition Review: Mobiles, UK Office of Telecommunications, London, February.

UK Office of Telecommunications (Oftel) (2002), Review of SIM‐Locking Policy, 26 November, available at: www.oftel.gov.uk/publications/mobile/2002/sim1102.htm.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả