Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method

Journal of Manufacturing Systems - Tập 50 - Trang 9-24 - 2019
Ashkan Memari1,2, Ahmad Dargi3, Mohammad Reza Akbari Jokar1, Robiah Ahmad2, Abd. Rahman Abdul Rahim2
1Department of Industrial Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Engineering, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3Vehicle, Fuel and Environment Research Institute, School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Tài liệu tham khảo

Govindan, 2015, Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review, J Clean Prod, 98, 66, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046 Zimmer, 2016, Sustainable supplier management–a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development, Int J Prod Res, 54, 1412, 10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340 Sen, 2018, Sustainable supplier selection in intuitionistic fuzzy environment: a decision making perspective, Benchmark Int J, 10.1108/BIJ-11-2016-0172 Atanassov, 1986, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst, 20, 87, 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 Noci, 1997, Designing ‘green’vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance, Eur J Purch Supply Manage, 3, 103, 10.1016/S0969-7012(96)00021-4 Lee, 2009, A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry, Expert Syst Appl, 36, 7917, 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.052 Awasthi, 2010, A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers, Int J Prod Econ, 126, 370, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.029 Amindoust, 2012, Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system, Appl Soft Comput, 12, 1668, 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023 Bai, 2010, Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory, J Clean Prod, 18, 1200, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.016 Shen, 2013, A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences, Resour Conserv Recycl, 74, 170, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.006 Mafakheri, 2011, Supplier selection-order allocation: A two-stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach, Int J Prod Econ, 132, 52, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.005 Bali, 2013, Green supplier selection based on IFS and GRA, Grey Syst Theory Appl, 3, 158, 10.1108/GS-04-2013-0007 Kannan, 2015, Fuzzy Axiomatic Design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore, J Clean Prod, 96, 194, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.076 Çifçi, 2011, A fuzzy MCDM approach to evaluate green suppliers, Int J Comput Intell Syst, 4, 894, 10.1080/18756891.2011.9727840 Büyüközkan, 2012, An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation, Int J Prod Res, 50, 2892, 10.1080/00207543.2011.564668 Dou, 2014, Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology, Eur J Oper Res, 233, 420, 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.03.004 Ghadimi, 2017, Making sustainable sourcing decisions: practical evidence from the automotive industry, Int J Logist, 20, 297, 10.1080/13675567.2016.1227310 Azimifard, 2018, Selecting sustainable supplier countries for Iran’s steel industry at three levels by using AHP and TOPSIS methods, Resour Policy, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.002 Wittstruck, 2012, Integrating the concept of sustainability into the partner selection process: a fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS approach, Int J Logist Syst Manage, 12, 195, 10.1504/IJLSM.2012.047221 Vahidi, 2018, Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks, J Clean Prod, 174, 1351, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.012 Labuschagne, 2005, Environmental and social impact considerations for sustainable project life cycle management in the process industry, Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage, 12, 38, 10.1002/csr.76 Thornton, 2013, does socially responsible supplier selection pay off for customer firms? A cross‐cultural comparison, J Supply Chain Manage, 49, 66, 10.1111/jscm.12014 Saeedi Mehrabad, 2017, A location-allocation model in the multi-level supply chain with multi-objective evolutionary approach, J Ind Syst Eng, 10, 140 Atanassov, 1999, 1 Babbar, 2018, A multi-objective mathematical model integrating environmental concerns for supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy QFD in beverages industry, Expert Syst Appl, 92, 27, 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.041 Luthra, 2017, An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains, J Clean Prod, 140, 1686, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078 Fallahpour, 2017, A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management, Comput Ind Eng, 105, 391, 10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.005 Kumar, 2014, A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection, Omega, 42, 109, 10.1016/j.omega.2013.04.003 Yu, 2014, A supplier pre-selection model for multiple products with synergy effect, Int J Prod Res, 52, 5206, 10.1080/00207543.2014.900199 Dargi, 2014, Supplier selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach, Procedia Comput Sci, 31, 691, 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.317 Hsu, 2013, Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management, J Clean Prod, 56, 164, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.012 Govindan, 2013, A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach, J Clean Prod, 47, 345, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014 Parthiban, 2013, Vendor selection problem: a multi-criteria approach based on strategic decisions, Int J Prod Res, 51, 1535, 10.1080/00207543.2012.709644 Kannan, 2013, Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chai, J Clean Prod, 47, 355, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.010 Shaw, 2013, Global supplier selection considering sustainability and carbon footprint issue: AHP multi-objective fuzzy linear programming approach, Int J Oper Res, 17, 215, 10.1504/IJOR.2013.053624 Baskaran, 2012, Indian textile suppliers’ sustainability evaluation using the grey approach, Int J Prod Econ, 135, 647, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.012 Büyüközkan, 2011, A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information, Comput Ind, 62, 164, 10.1016/j.compind.2010.10.009 Önüt, 2008, A two-phase possibilistic linear programming methodology for multi-objective supplier evaluation and order allocation problems, Inf Sci, 178, 485, 10.1016/j.ins.2007.08.002 Boran, 2009, A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert Syst Appl, 36, 11363, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039 Delbecq, 1971, A group process model for problem identification and program planning, J Appl Behav Sci, 7, 466, 10.1177/002188637100700404 Shyur, 2006, A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection, Math Comput Model, 44, 749, 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018 Shu, 2006, Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault-tree analysis on printed circuit board assembly, Microelectron Reliab, 46, 2139, 10.1016/j.microrel.2006.01.007 Adak, 2012, Intuitionistic fuzzy block matrix and its some properties, Ann Pure Appl Math, 1, 13 Xu, 2007, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 15, 1179, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678 Szmidt, 2000, Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst, 114, 505, 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00244-9 Chen, 2000, Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets Syst, 114, 1, 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1 Zimmermann, 2012 Ghayebloo, 2015, Developing a bi-objective model of the closed-loop supply chain network with green supplier selection and disassembly of products: the impact of parts reliability and product greenness on the recovery network, J Manuf Syst, 36, 76, 10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.02.011 Jain, 2016, An integrated buyer initiated decision-making process for green supplier selection, J Manuf Syst, 41, 256, 10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.09.004