Cường độ bền vững và dịch vụ hệ sinh thái: những hướng đi mới trong quản trị nông nghiệp

Policy Sciences - Tập 47 - Trang 51-67 - 2013
Robert Fish1, Michael Winter1, Matt Lobley1
1Centre for Rural Policy Research, College of Social Sciences and International Studies, Exeter, Devon, UK

Tóm tắt

Việc hòa giải các mục tiêu môi trường trong sử dụng đất với nhu cầu sản xuất thực phẩm nhiều hơn là một mối quan tâm nổi bật trong các cuộc thảo luận về khoa học và chính sách liên quan đến nông nghiệp bền vững. Khái niệm cường độ bền vững đã xuất hiện như một cách tiếp cận nổi bật đối với thách thức này. Trong bài báo này, chúng tôi làm rõ khái niệm này từ góc nhìn về dịch vụ hệ sinh thái trong quản lý tài nguyên thiên nhiên, đặc biệt là với những phát triển tại Vương quốc Anh. Bài báo xem xét nguồn gốc và đặc điểm chung của góc nhìn này và cách thách thức cường độ bền vững sẽ được khái niệm hóa và tiếp cận thông qua đó. Mặc dù những nỗ lực kết nối phân tích dịch vụ hệ sinh thái với phát triển và thực hiện chính sách tại Vương quốc Anh được tiết lộ là phù hợp với các cách tiếp cận hiện hành và thường là lâu dài đối với nông nghiệp bền vững, nhưng việc thị trường hóa các tài sản môi trường được nhấn mạnh như một đặc điểm phân biệt của các ứng dụng chính sách hiện nay. Tính cách và những hạn chế của khía cạnh này trong chương trình dịch vụ hệ sinh thái được thảo luận. Nhu cầu thể hiện các vấn đề sinh thái của cường độ bền vững thông qua các khung tham chiếu khác ngoài việc định giá kinh tế được nhấn mạnh.

Từ khóa

#cường độ bền vững #dịch vụ hệ sinh thái #quản trị nông nghiệp #chính sách nông nghiệp bền vững #tài nguyên thiên nhiên

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bastian, O. (2013). The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecological Indicators, 24, 12–22. Bommarco, D., Kleijn, R., & Potts, S. G. (2013). Ecological intensification: Harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(4), 230–238. Burkhard, B., Petrosillo, I., & Costanza, R. (2010). Ecosystem services: Bridging ecology, economy and social sciences. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 257–259. Carruthers, P. (2009). ‘Doing the right thing’: Ethical approaches to land use decision making. In M. Winter, M. Lobley (Eds.) What is land for? The food, fuel and climate change debate (pp. 293–318). London: Earthscan. Chan, K., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18. Chappell, M. J., & LaValle, L. A. (2011). Food security and biodiversity: Can we have both? An agroecological analysis. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 3–26. Clark, J., Burgess, J., & Harrison, C. M. (2000). “I struggled with this money business”: Respondents’ perspectives on contingent valuation. Environmental Economics, 33, 45–62. CLG. (2011). The national planning policy framework. London: CLG. Constanza, R., de d’Arge, R., Groot, R., Grasso, S., Farber, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260. Curtis, F. (2009). Peak globalization: Climate change, oil depletion and global trade. Ecological Economics, 69(2), 427–434. Daily, G. C. (Ed.). (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press. Daily, G. C., & Ellison, K. (2002). The new economy of nature: The quest to make conservation profitable. Washington, DC: Island Press. Daily, G., Karieva, P., Polasky, S., et al. (2011). Mainstreaming natural capital in decisions. In P. Karieva, H. Tallis, T. H. Ricketts, et al. (Eds.), Natural capital: Theory & practice of mapping ecosystem services (pp. 3–14). Oxford: University Press. Daniel, T., Muhar, A., Arneberger, A., et al. (2012). Contribution of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. PNAS,. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114773109. de Groot, R. S. (1992). Functions of nature: Evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision-making. Groningen, NL: Wolters-Noordhoff. Deal, R., Cochran, B., & La Rocco, G. (2012). Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 17, 69–76. Defra, (2010). Food 2030. London: Defra. Defra, (2011). The natural choice: Securing the value of nature. The UK Natural Environment White Paper. London: Defra. Dunlop, C. (2009). Regulating land use technologies: How does government juggle the risks? In M. Winter, M. Lobley (Eds.) What is land for? The food, fuel and climate change debate (pp. 263–292). London: Earthscan. EFRA. (2009). Securing food supplies up to 2050: The challenges faced by the UK. London: House of Commons. FAO. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: FAO. Farley, J., & Constanza, R. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics, 69, 2060–2068. Firbank, L., Bradbury, R. B., McCracken, D. I., et al. (2012). Delivering multiple ecosystem services from Enclosed Farmland in the UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 166, 65–75. Fish, R. (2011). Environmental decision making and an ecosystems approach: Some challenges from the perspective of social science. Progress in Physical Geography, 35(5), 671–680. Foresight. (2011). The future of food and farming. London: The Government Office for Science. Garnett, T., & Godfray, H. (2012). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Navigating a course through competing food system priorities. Oxford: Food Climate Research Network and the Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food. Gasparatos, A., Stromberg, P., & Takeuchi, K. (2011). Biofuels, ecosystem services and human wellbeing: Putting biofuels in the ecosystem services narrative. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 142(3–4), 111–128. Gomez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69, 1209–1218. Gordon, L., Max Finlayson, C., & Falkenmark, M. (2010). Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agricultural Water Management, 97(4), 512–519. Gornall, J., Betts, R., Burke, E., Clark, R., Camp, J., Willett, K., et al. (2010). Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 365, 2973–2989. Gregory, P. J., Newton, S. N., Johnson, A. C., & Ingram, J. S. I. (2009). Integrating pests and pathogens into the climate change/food security debate. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60, 2827–2838. Haines-Young, R., & Potchin, M. (2009). Methodologies for defining and assessing ecosystem services. Nottingham: Centre for Environmental Management, University of Nottingham. Hajjar, R., Jarvis, D., & Gemmill-Herren, B. (2008). The utility of crop genetic diversity in maintaining ecosystem services. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 123(4), 261–270. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell. Harvey, M., & Pilgrim, M. (2011). The new competition for land: Food, energy, and climate change. Food Policy, 36, S40–S51. Hodgson, J. A., Kunin, W. E., Thomas, C. D., Benton, T. G., & Gabriel, D. (2010). Comparing organic farming and land sparing: Optimizing yield and butterfly populations at a landscape scale. Ecology Letters, 13, 1358–1367. Horlings, L. G., & Marsden, T. K. (2011). Towards the real green revolution? Exploring the conceptual dimensions of a new ecological modernisation of agriculture that could ‘feed the world. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 441–452. Kelsey Jack, B., Kousky, C., & Sims, K.R (2008). Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of National Academic Science, 105(28), 9465–9470. Kosoy, N., & Corbera, E. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological Economics, 69, 1228–1236. Lang, T. (2009). Reshaping the food system for ecological public health. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition, 4(3–4), 2009. Lang, T., Barling, D., & Caraher, M. (2009). Food policy: Integrating health, environment and society. Oxford: University Press. LUC. (2009). Provision of ecosystem services through the environmental stewardship scheme. LUC: Bristol. Ludwig, D. (2001). The era of management is over. Ecosystems, 4(8), 758–764. MA. (2005a). Millennium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington DC: Island Press. MA. (2005b). Current states and trends assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press. MA. (2005c). Scenarios assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press. Maye, D., & Kirwan, J. (2013). Food security: A fractured consensus. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 1–6. McAfee, K., & Shapiro, E. N. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: Nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(3), 1–21. Milder, J. C., Scherr, S., & Bracer, C. (2010). Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 4. Montgomery, D. (2007). Dirt: The erosion of civilizations. California: University Press. Murphy, S. (2010). Biofuels: Finding a sustainable balance between food and energy. In G. Lawrence, K. Lyons, & T. Wallington (Eds.), Food security, nutrition and sustainability (pp. 224–237). London: Earthscan. Nedkov, S., & Burkhard, B. (2012). Flood regulating ecosystem services—mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators, 21, 67–79. Nelson, E., Montgomery, C. A., Conte, M., et al. (2011a). The provisioning value of timber and non timber forest products. In P. Karieva, H. Tallis, T. H. Ricketts, et al. (Eds.), Natural capital: Theory & practice of m a pping ecosystem services (pp. 129–149). Oxford: University Press. Nelson, E., Wood, S., Koo, J., et al. (2011b). Provisioning and regulatory ecosystem services values in agriculture. In P. Karieva, H. Tallis, T. H. Ricketts, et al. (Eds.), Natural capital: Theory & practice of mapping ecosystem services (pp. 150–167). Oxford: University Press. Norton, L. R., Inwood, H., Crowe, A., et al. (2010). Trailing a method to quantify the cultural services of the English Landscape using Countryside Survey Data. Land Use Policy, 29, 449–455. O’Neill, J. (2007). Markets, deliberation and environment. London: Routledge. Pearce, D., Ozdemiroglu, E., et al. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques. London: DTLGR. Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalising space. Antipode, 34, 380–404. Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2012) (Eds.) Resilience and the cultural landscape understanding and managing change in human-shaped environments. Cambridge: University Press. Popkin, B. M. (1994). The nutrition transition in low income countries: An emerging crisis. Nutrition Reviews, 52, 285–298. Popkin, B. M. (1998). The nutrition transition and its health implications in lower income countries. Nutrition Reviews, 1, 5–21. Power, A. G. (2010). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 365, 2959–2971. Rayner, G., & Lang, T. (2012). Ecological public health: Reshaping the conditions for good health. London: Routledge. Robertson, M. (2012). Measurement and alienation: Making a world of ecosystem services. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(3), 386–401. Rosillo-Call, F., & Johnson, F. X. (2010). Food versus fuel. London: Zed Books. Rossing, W. A. H., Zander, P., Josien, E., et al. (2007). Integrative modelling approaches for analysis of impact of multifunctional agriculture: A review for France, Germany and The Netherlands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 120, 41–57. Royal Society. (2008). Reaping the benefits: Science and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. London: Royal Society. Sagoff, M. (2004). Price, principle, and the environment. Cambridge: University Press. Sandhu, H., Wratten, S., & Cullen, R. (2010). The role of supporting ecosystem systems in conventional and organic arable farmland. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 302–310. Swinton, S., Lupi, F., Robertson, G. P., & Hamilton, S. K. (2007). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystem for diverse benefits. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 245–252. Tomlinson, I. (2013). Doubling food production to feed the 9 billion: A critical perspective on a key discourse of food security in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 81–90. UK NEA. (2011). The UK national ecosystem assessment. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC. Vandermeer, J. H., van Noordwijk, M., Anderson, J., et al. (1998). Global change and multi-species agroecosystems: Concepts and issues. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 67, 1–22. Vatn, A. (2002). Multifunctional agriculture: Some consequences for international trade regimes. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29, 309–327. Wilson, G. A. (2007). Multifunctional agriculture: A transition theory perspective. Wallingford: CAB International. Winter, M., & Lobley, M. (Eds.) (2009). What is land for? The food, fuel and climate change debate. London: Earthscan. Winter, M., Oliver, D. M., Fish, R., et al. (2010). Catchments, sub-catchments and private spaces: Scale and process in managing microbial pollution from source to sea. Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 315–326. Yusoff, K. (2011). The valuation of nature: The natural choice white paper. Radical Philosophy, 170, 2–7. Zecca, A., & Chiari, L. (2010). Fossil-fuel constraints on global warming. Energy Policy, 38(1), 1–3. Zhang, W., Ricketts, T. H., Kremen, C., et al. (2007). Ecosystem services and disservices to agriculture. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 253–260.