Sustainability of Stack Exchange Q&A communities: the role of trust

Leydesdorff L (2001) In: A sociological theory of communication: the self-organization of the knowledge-based society. Universal-Publishers, USA. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd.2002.58.1.106.2 Leydesdorff L (2012) The triple helix, quadruple helix,…, and an n-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? J Knowl Econ 3(1):25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4 Lipkova H, Landová H, Jarolímková A (2017) Information literacy vis-a-vis epidemic of distrust. In: European conference on information literacy. Springer, Berlin, pp 833–843 Lucassen T, Schraagen JM (2012) Propensity to trust and the influence of source and medium cues in credibility evaluation. J Inf Sci 38(6):566–577 Abrahao B, Parigi P, Gupta A, Cook KS (2017) Reputation offsets trust judgments based on social biases among airbnb users. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(37):9848–9853 Dankulov MM, Melnik R, Tadić B (2015) The dynamics of meaningful social interactions and the emergence of collective knowledge. Sci Rep 5(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12197 Saxena A, Reddy H (2021) Users roles identification on online crowdsourced q&a platforms and encyclopedias: a survey. J Comput Soc Sci 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00125-9 Santos T, Walk S, Kern R, Strohmaier M, Helic D (2019) Activity archetypes in question-and-answer (q8a) websites—a study of 50 stack exchange instances. ACM Trans Soc Comput 2(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301612 Slag R, de Waard M, Bacchelli A (2015) One-day flies on stackoverflow-why the vast majority of stackoverflow users only posts once. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 12th working conference on mining software repositories. IEEE, pp 458–461. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2015.63 Chhabra A, Iyengar SRS (2020) Activity-selection behavior of users in stackexchange websites. In: Companion proceedings of the web conference 2020, pp 105–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366424.3382720 Dev H, Geigle C, Hu Q, Zheng J, Sundaram H (2018) The size conundrum: why online knowledge markets can fail at scale. In: Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference, pp 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186037 Santos T, Walk S, Kern R, Strohmaier M, Helic D (2019) Self-and cross-excitation in stack exchange question & answer communities. In: The world wide web conference, pp 1634–1645. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313440 Oliver PE, Marwell G (2001) Whatever happened to critical mass theory? A retrospective and assessment. Sociol Theory 19(3):292–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00142 Smiljanić J, Mitrović Dankulov M (2017) Associative nature of event participation dynamics: a network theory approach. PLoS ONE 12(2):0171565. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171565 Török J, Kertész J (2017) Cascading collapse of online social networks. Sci Rep 7(1):16743. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17135-1 Lőrincz L, Koltai J, Győr AF, Takács K (2019) Collapse of an online social network: burning social capital to create it? Soc Netw 57:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.11.004 Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Q 29(1):35–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667 Hung S-Y, Durcikova A, Lai H-M, Lin W-M (2011) The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 69(6):415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.02.004 Rode H (2016) To share or not to share: the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on knowledge-sharing in enterprise social media platforms. J Inf Technol 31(2):152–165. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.8 Kairam SR, Wang DJ, Leskovec J (2012) The life and death of online groups: predicting group growth and longevity. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on web search and data mining, pp 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1145/2124295.2124374 Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang D-U (2006) Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys Rep 424(4–5):175–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 Gallagher RJ, Young J-G, Welles BF (2021) A clarified typology of core-periphery structure in networks. Sci Adv 7(12):9800. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc9800 Melnikov A, Lee J, Rivera V, Mazzara M, Longo L (2018) Towards dynamic interaction-based reputation models. In: 2018 IEEE 32nd international conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2018.00070 Wei X, Chen W, Zhu K (2015) Motivating user contributions in online knowledge communities: virtual rewards and reputation. In: 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE, pp 3760–3769. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.452 Yanovsky S, Hoernle N, Lev O, Gal K (2019) One size does not fit all: badge behavior in q&a sites. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization, pp 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/3320435.3320438 Santos T, Burghardt K, Lerman K, Helic D (2020) Can badges Foster a more welcoming culture on q&a boards? In: Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, vol 14, pp 969–973 Bornfeld B, Rafaeli S (2019) When interaction is valuable: feedback, churn and survival on community question and answer sites: the case of stack exchange. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences Kang M (2021) Motivational affordances and survival of new askers on social q&a sites: the case of stack exchange network. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24548 Ahmed S, Yang S, Johri A (2015) Does online q&a activity vary based on topic: a comparison of technical and non-technical stack exchange forums. In: Proceedings of the second (2015) ACM conference on learning@ scale, pp 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2728701 Chen G, Mok L (2021) Characterizing growth and decline in online ux communities. In: Extended abstracts of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451646 Posnett D, Warburg E, Devanbu P, Filkov V (2012) Mining stack exchange: expertise is evident from initial contributions. In: 2012 international conference on social informatics. IEEE, pp 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialInformatics.2012.67 Pal A, Chang S, Konstan JA (2012) Evolution of experts in question answering communities. In: Sixth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media Oliveira N, Muller M, Andrade N, Reinecke K (2018) The exchange in stackexchange: Divergences between stack overflow and its culturally diverse participants. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact 2(CSCW):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274399 Dover Y, Kelman G (2018) Emergence of online communities: empirical evidence and theory. PLoS ONE 13(11):0205167. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205167 Han X, Cao S, Shen Z, Zhang B, Wang W-X, Cressman R, Stanley HE (2017) Emergence of communities and diversity in social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(11):2887–2891. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608164114 Kleineberg K-K, Boguñá M (2015) Digital ecology: coexistence and domination among interacting networks. Sci Rep 5(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10268 Oliver P, Marwell G, Teixeira R (1985) A theory of the critical mass. I. Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. Am J Sociol 91(3):522–556. https://doi.org/10.1086/228313 Dunning D, Anderson JE, Schlösser T, Ehlebracht D, Fetchenhauer D (2014) Trust at zero acquaintance: more a matter of respect than expectation of reward, vol 107 pp 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036673 Dunning D, Fetchenhauer D, Schlösser T (2019) Why people trust: solved puzzles and open mysteries. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 28(4):366–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838255 Schilke O, Reimann M, Cook KS (2021) Trust in Social Relations. Annu Rev Sociol 47(1):239–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-082120-082850 McEvily B, Zaheer A, Soda G (2021) Network trust. In: Gillespie N, Fulmer A, Lewicki R (eds) Understanding trust in organizations. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429449185 Aberer K, Despotovic Z (2001) Managing trust in a peer-2-peer information system. In: CIKM’01. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1145/502585.502638 Duma C, Shahmehri N, Caronni G (2005) Dynamic trust metrics for peer-to-peer systems. In: 16th international workshop on database and expert systems applications (DEXA’05). IEEE, pp 776–781. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.2005.80 Tschannen-Moran M, Hoy W (2000) A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. In: Review of educational research, vol 70. American Educational Research Association, pp 547–593. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070004547 Dover Y, Goldenberg J, Shapira D (2020) Sustainable online communities exhibit distinct hierarchical structures across scales of size. Proc R Soc A 476(2239):20190730. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0730 Orsini C, Dankulov MM, Colomer-de-Simón P, Jamakovic A, Mahadevan P, Vahdat A, Bassler KE, Toroczkai Z, Boguná M, Caldarelli G et al. (2015) Quantifying randomness in real networks. Nat Commun 6(1):8627. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9627 Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X (2006) Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1150402.1150412 Centola D, Eguíluz VM, Macy MW (2007) Cascade dynamics of complex propagation. Phys A, Stat Mech Appl 374(1):449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.06.018 Bollobás B, Riordan OM (2003) Mathematical results on scale-free random graphs. In: Handbook of graphs and networks: from the genome to the Internet, pp 1–34 Fortunato S (2010) Community detection in graphs. Phys Rep 486(3–5):75–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 Saramäki J, Moro E (2015) From seconds to months: an overview of multi-scale dynamics of mobile telephone calls. Eur Phys J B 88(6):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2015-60106-6 Krings G, Karsai M, Bernhardsson S, Blondel VD, Saramäki J (2012) Effects of time window size and placement on the structure of an aggregated communication network. EPJ Data Sci 1(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds4 Barrat A, Gelardi V, Le Bail D, Claidiere N (2021) From temporal network data to the dynamics of social relationships. Proc R Soc Lond B, Biol Sci 288:20211164. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1164 Arnold NA, Steer B, Hafnaoui I, Parada GHA, Mondragon RJ, Cuadrado F, Clegg RG (2021) Moving with the times: investigating the alt-right network gab with temporal interaction graphs. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact 5(CSCW2) 447. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479591 Yashkina E, Pinigin A, Lee J, Mazzara M, Adekotujo AS, Zubair A, Longo L (2019) Expressing trust with temporal frequency of user interaction in online communities. In: Advanced information networking and applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15032-7_95