Surveying preschool teachers’ use of digital tablets: general and technology education related findings

Anna Otterborn1, Konrad J. Schönborn2, Magnus Hultén1
1Department of Social and Welfare Studies (ISV), Linköping University, 60174, Norrköping, Sweden
2Department of Science and Technology (ITN), Linköping University, 60174, Norrköping, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aldhafeeri, F., Palaiologou, I., & Folorunsho, A. (2016). Integration of digital technologies into play-based pedagogy in Kuwaiti early childhood education: teachers’ views, attitudes and aptitudes. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(3), 342–360.

Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2007). Conducting research on the internet: Online survey design, development and implementation guidelines. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2), 185–210.

Aronin, S., & Floyd, K. K. (2013). Using an iPad in inclusive preschool classrooms to introduce STEM Concepts. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 34–39.

Bajovic, M. (2018). Playing and learning across the concrete and digital realms: a new context for the new learners. International Journal of Play, 7(2), 199–209.

Bers, M. U., Seddighin, S., & Sullivan, A. (2013). Ready for robotics: Bringing together the T and E of STEM in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(3), 355.

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Couse, L. J., & Chen, D. W. (2010). A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(1), 75–98.

Falloon, G. (2014). What´s going on behind the screens? Researching young students’ learning pathways using iPads. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 30(4), 318–336.

Fridberg, M., Thulin, S., & Redfors, A. (2017). Preschool children’s collaborative science learning scaffolded by tablets. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9596-9 .

Goldring, E., Huff, J., Spillane, J. P., & Barnes, C. (2009). Measuring the learning-centered leadership expertise of school principals. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(2), 197–228.

Håkansson, & Lindqvist, M. (2015). Exploring activities regarding technology enhanced learning in a one-to-one initiative. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(4), 227–245.

Hasse, C. (2017). Technological literacy for teachers. Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 365–378.

Hultén, M., & Björkholm, E. (2016). Epistemic habits: Primary school teacher’s development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in a design-based research project. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3), 335–351.

Imsen, G. (1999). Reflection as a bridging concept between normative and descriptive approaches to didactics. In B. Hudson, F. Buchberger, P. Kansanen, & H. Seel (Eds.), Didaktik/fachdidaktik as science(-s) of the teaching profession? (pp. 95–105). Umeå: Umeå University, Department of Teacher Education and Research.

Kjällander, S., & Frankenberg, S. (2018). How to design a digital individual learning RCT-study in the context of the Swedish preschool: Experiences from a pilot-study. International Journal of Research and Method in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1470161 .

Kress, G. R. (1997). Before writing: rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (Eds.). (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. New York: Peter Lang.

Lindahl, M. G., & Folkesson, A. M. (2012). Can we let computers change practice? Educators’ interpretations of preschool tradition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1728–1737.

Luckin, R., Bligh, B., Manches, A., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., & Noss, R. (2012). Decoding learning: the proof, promise and potential of digital education. London: Nesta.

Lundahl, C. (2009). Varför nationella prov? Framväxt, dilemman, möjligheter. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Lundgren, U. P. (1981). Model analysis of pedagogical processes. Lund: Liber.

Marklund, L. (2015). Preschool teachers’ informal online professional development in relation to educational use of tablets in Swedish preschools. Professional Development in Education, 41(2), 236–253.

Marklund, L., & Dunkels, E. (2016). Digital play as a means to develop children’s literacy and power in the Swedish preschool. Early Years, 36(3), 289–304.

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und techniken (7th ed.). Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.

Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2014). Touch screen tablets and emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(4), 231–239.

Nilsen, M. (2014). Barns aktiviteter med datorplattor I förskolan (Licentiate thesis, Nationella forskarskolan för ämnesdidaktik i Mångfaldens förskola. Förutsättningar och möjligheter för barns språkliga och matematiska utveckling och lärande (FoBaSM), nr 3). Available: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/37236 .

Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (2015). Introduction: The making and governing of knowledge in the education policy field. In A. Nordin & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational policy flows in European education: The making and governing of knowledge in the education policy field (pp. 9–20). Oxford: Symposium Books.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Palmér, H. (2015). Using tablet computers in preschool: How does the design of applications influence participation, interaction and dialogues? International Journal of Early Years Education, 23(4), 365–381.

Paneque, O. M., & Barbetta, P. M. (2006). A study of teacher efficacy of special education teachers of English language learners with disabilities. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(1), 171–193.

Petersen, P. (2015). That’s how much I can do!: Children’s agency in digital tablet activities in a Swedish preschool environment. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(3), 145–169.

Rosén, M. (2011, 24 november). Datorer får barn att läsa mindre [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkVcn0ZmpMg .

Rosén, M., & Gustafsson, J. (2016). Is computer availability at home causally related to reading achievement in grade 4? A longitudinal difference in differences approach to IEA data from 1991 to 2006. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 4(5), 1–19.

Spiezia, V. (2011). Does computer use increase educational achievements? Student-level evidence from PISA. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 7(1), 1–22.

Strawhacker, A., Lee, M., & Bers, M. (2017). Teaching tools, teachers’ rules: exploring the impact of teaching styles on young children’s programming knowledge in ScratchJr. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9400-9 .

Swedish National Agency for Education (2011). Läroplan för förskolan Lpfö 98. (2., rev. uppl.) Stockholm: Skolverket.

Swedish National Agency for Education. (2013). It-användning och it-kompetens i skolan. Rapport nr: 386. Stockholm: Fritzes.

Swedish National Agency for Education. (2015). It-användning och elevresultat i PISA 2012. Fokus på, 2015(3), 1–4.

Swedish National Agency for Education (2016a). Läroplan för förskolan Lpfö 98. ([Ny, rev. uppl.],]). Stockholm: Skolverket.

Swedish National Agency for Education. (2016b). IT-användning och IT-kompetens i skola (Utvärderingsavdelningen). Stockholm: Skolverket.

Swedish National Agency for Education. (2017). Förslag till reviderad läroplan för förskolan [Proposal for a revised preschool curriculum]. Dnr 2017:783. Retrieved from https://www.skolverket.se/polopoly_fs/1.266112!/Remiss_Laroplan_for_forskolan.pdf . 21 Dec 2017.

Wohlwend, K. E. (2015). One screen, many fingers: Young children’s collaborative literacy play with digital puppetry apps and touchscreen technologies. Theory into Practice, 54(2), 154–162.

Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007). Rethinking scaffolding in the information age. Computers & Education, 48(3), 362–382.