Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models

Transportation Research Record - Tập 1840 Số 1 - Trang 104-115 - 2003
Douglas Gettman1, Larry Head1
1Siemens Gardner Transportation Systems,6375 East Tanque Verde No. 170, Tucson, AZ 85715

Tóm tắt

Safety is emerging as an area of increased attention and awareness within transportation engineering. Historically, the safety of new and innovative traffic treatments has been difficult to assess, primarily because of a lack of good predictive models of crash potential and a lack of consensus on what constitutes a safe or unsafe facility. An FHWA-sponsored research project investigated the potential to derive surrogate measures of safety from existing traffic simulation models. These surrogate measures could then be used to support evaluations of various traffic engineering alternatives, including facilities that have not yet been built and strategies that have not yet been used. Each surrogate measure is collected on the basis of the occurrence of a conflict event, which is an interaction between two vehicles in which one vehicle must take evasive action to avoid a collision. The surrogate measures that are proposed as the best are time to collision, postencroachment time, deceleration rate, maximum speed, and speed differential. Time to collision, postencroachment time, and deceleration rate can be used to measure the severity of the conflict. Maximum speed and the speed differential can be used to measure the severity of the potential collision (by use of additional information about the mass of the vehicles involved to assess momentum). After the simulation model is executed for a number of iterations, a postprocessing tool would be used to compute the statistics for the various measures and perform comparisons between design alternatives.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2003, Report FHWA-03-050

10.3141/1658-06

Bauer K., 2000, Statistical Models of At-Grade Intersection Accidents

Bared J., 1999, ITE Journal, 50

10.3141/1665-06

Datta T. K., 1991, Transportation Research Record 1318, 58

Davis G. A., 1993, Transportation Research Record 1401, 43

10.3141/1746-01

Harwood D., 2000, Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways

Hauer E., 1988, Transportation Research Record 1185, 48

Ossenbruggen P., 1998, Risk, Health, and Environment, 83

Persaud B. N., 1995, Transportation Research Record 1485, 134

10.3141/1581-06

Mahale D., 1986, Transportation Research Record 1068, 85

Zegeer C. V., 1986, NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 128: Methods for Identifying Hazardous Highway Elements

10.3141/1542-09

Higle J. L., 1989, Transportation Research Record 1238, 10

Higle J. L., 1988, Transportation Research Record 1185, 24

Lau M., 1988, Accident Prediction Model Development: Signalized Intersections

10.3141/1635-05

Kaub A., 2000, Presented at 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board

10.1016/0001-4575(94)90021-3

1990, Traffic Conflict Techniques for Safety and Operations

Glauz W. D., 1980, NCHRP Report 219: Application of Traffic Conflict Analysis at Intersections

Parker M., 1988, Traffic Conflict Technique for Safety and Operations. Engineers Guide

Perkins D., 1967, Criteria for Traffic Conflict Characteristics

Amundsen F., 1977, Proc., First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts

Allen B. L., 1978, Transportation Research Record 667, 67

Migletz D., 1985, Relationships Between Traffic Conflicts and Accidents

Hyden C., 1987, The Development of a Method for Traffic Safety Evaluation: The Swedish Conflicts Technique

Fazio J., 1990, Transportation Research Record 1287, 96

10.1080/03081069908717634

Fitzpatrick K., 1991, Transportation Research Record 1303, 103

Gharaybeh F. A., 1991, Transportation Research Record 1318, 70

Katamine N., 1998, Road and Transport Research, 7

Salman N. K., 1995, Transportation Research Record 1485, 177

Hayward J., 1972, Near Miss Determination Through Use of a Scale of Danger

10.1016/0001-4575(91)90035-4

Tiwari G., 1995, Proc., 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Advancement of Automotive Medicine

10.1177/003754978003400505

Darzentas J., 1980, Traffic Engineering and Control, 21, 58

Cooper D., 1976, Traffic Engineering and Control, 17, 306

GhaffariM. A Stochastic Computer Simulation of Traffic Conflicts. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois at Chicago, 1990.

Perkins D. D., 1983, Transportation Research Record 905, 138

Thompson H., 1983, Transportation Research Record 905, 142

Fitzpatrick K., 2000, NCHRP Report 440: Accident Mitigation Guide for Congested Rural Two-Lane Highways

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:1(23)

HernandezV. A Microscopic Digital Computer Simulation of Traffic Conflicts at 4-Way Fixed Time Signalized Urban Intersections. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles, 1982.

Huang X. P., 1994, Transportation Research Record 1456, 34

10.3141/1746-06

Fazio J., 1993, Transportation Research Record 1401, 61

Kosonen I., 2000, Proc., Conference on Road Safety on Three Continents

KosonenI. HUTSIM-Urban Traffic Simulation and Control Model: Principles and Applications. Ph.D. thesis. Transportation Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, 1999.

Rioux T., 1977, TEXAS-A Microscopic Traffic Simulation Package for Isolated Intersections

AvgoustisA. Quantifying the Safety Impacts of Intelligent Transportation Systems. M.S. thesis. Civil Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 1999.

Lin S., 1998, CORSIM Micronode Logic

Torday A., 2002, Safety Indicator for Microsimulation-Based Assessments

10.3141/1802-28

1993, Alumnus Software, Document on the Micro-Node Logic as Implemented in the Fortran Code of CORSIM (TSIS Version 4.01 Beta)

Kokkinen M., 1996, HUTSIM 4.2: Quick Reference Guide

Lee C., 1993, TEXAS Model for Intersection Traffic Version 3.0 Documentation-Updated for Version 3.20

2001, VISSIM User Manual Version 3.6

10.3141/1644-09

10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00019-1