Surgical Results and Complications for Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Reverse Systematic Review

European Urology Open Science - Tập 44 - Trang 150-161 - 2022
Tomás Bernardo Costa Moretti1, Luís Alberto Magna2, Leonardo Oliveira Reis1,3
1Doctoral Program in Medical Pathophysiology and UroScience, Division of Urology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
2Department of Medical Genetics, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
3Center for Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

Tài liệu tham khảo

Sanda, 2018, Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline. Part I: risk stratification, shared decision making, and care options, J Urol, 199, 683, 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.095 Mottet, 2022 Murad, 2016, New evidence pyramid, Evid Based Med, 21, 125, 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401 Moher, 2015, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement, Syst Rev, 4, 1, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 Moretti, 2019, Development and application of reverse systematic review on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, Urol Oncol, 37, 647, 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.06.004 Booth, 2011, An international registry of systematic-review protocols, Lancet, 377, 108, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60903-8 Booth, 2011, Establishing a minimum dataset for prospective registration of systematic reviews: an international consultation, PLoS One, 6, e27319, 10.1371/journal.pone.0027319 Dindo, 2004, Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey, Ann Surg, 240, 205, 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae Novara, 2012, Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 62, 431, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044 Tewari, 2012, Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 62, 1, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.029 Moretti TBC, Reis LO. The “natural history” of evidence on radical prostatectomy: what have 20 years of robots given us? Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.006. Cacciamani, 2022, Robotic urologic oncologic surgery: ever-widening horizons, J Urol, 208, 8, 10.1097/JU.0000000000002752 Hu, 2003, Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes, J Clin Oncol, 21, 401, 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.169