Surface and interfacial analysis of sandblasted and acid-etched enamel for bonding orthodontic adhesives

Raphael Patcas1, Spiros Zinelis2, George Eliades3, Theodore Eliades4
1Senior research and teaching associate, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2Assistant professor, Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
3Professor and director, Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
4Professor and director, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Buonocore, 1955, A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces, J Dent Res, 34, 849, 10.1177/00220345550340060801 Black, 1945, Technic for nonmechanical preparation of cavities and prophylaxis, J Am Dent Assoc, 32, 955, 10.14219/jada.archive.1945.0129 Ibe, 1995, Improvement in the adhesive strength of orthodontic brackets on unit-cast and fired dental alloys by microsandblasting, J Orofac Orthop, 56, 110 Jost-Brinkmann, 1996, In-vitro study of the adhesive strengths of brackets on metals, ceramic and composite. Part 2: bonding to porcelain and composite resin, J Orofac Orthop, 57, 132, 10.1007/BF02191877 Jost-Brinkmann, 1996, In-vitro study of the adhesive strengths of brackets on metals, ceramic and composite. Part 1: bonding to precious metals and amalgam, J Orofac Orthop, 57, 76, 10.1007/BF02190481 Newman, 1995, Sandblasting, silanating, and coatings: their effects on bond strength of metal brackets: an in vitro study, J N J Dent Assoc, 66, 15 Newman, 1994, Update on bonding brackets: an in vitro survey, J Clin Orthod, 28, 396 Sperber, 1999, Adhesion of bonded orthodontic attachments to dental amalgam: in vitro study, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116, 506, 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70180-0 Brauchli, 2010, Influence of enamel conditioning on the shear bond strength of different adhesives, J Orofac Orthop, 71, 411, 10.1007/s00056-010-1036-2 Robles-Ruíz, 2014, Effect of lingual enamel sandblasting with aluminum oxide of different particle sizes in combination with phosphoric acid etching on indirect bonding of lingual brackets, Angle Orthod, 84, 1068, 10.2319/120613-897.1 Turkoz, 2012, Evaluation of different enamel conditioning techniques for orthodontic bonding, Korean J Orthod, 42, 32, 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.32 Pakshir, 2012, Effect of enamel surface treatment on the bond strength of metallic brackets in rebonding process, Eur J Orthod, 34, 773, 10.1093/ejo/cjr093 Borsatto, 2002, Shear bond strength of enamel surface treated with air-abrasive system, Braz Dent J, 13, 175, 10.1590/S0103-64402002000300006 Reisner, 1997, Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, 366, 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80018-2 Wiechmann, 2000, Lingual orthodontics (part 3): intraoral sandblasting and indirect bonding, J Orofac Orthop, 61, 280, 10.1007/s000560050013 Canay, 2000, The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 117, 15, 10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70243-5 Halpern, 2010, The effect of air abrasion preparation on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bracket bonded to enamel, Eur J Orthod, 32, 224, 10.1093/ejo/cjp080 Suma, 2012, The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface, Indian J Dent Res, 23, 230, 10.4103/0970-9290.100432 Mati, 2012, Effects of buccal and lingual enamel sandblasting on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a self-etching primer, Int Orthod, 10, 422 Cal-Neto, 2010, Influence of enamel sandblasting prior to etching on shear bond strength of indirectly bonded lingual appliances, Angle Orthod, 81, 149, 10.2319/050210-237.1 Miles, 2008, Does microetching enamel reduce bracket failure when indirect bonding mandibular posterior teeth?, Aust Orthod J, 24, 1 Gwinnett, 1981, Acid etching for composite resins, Dent Clin North Am, 25, 271, 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)02808-7 Gwinnett, 1992, Structure and composition of enamel, Oper Dent, 10 Arakawa, 1979, The effect of acid etching on the cervical region of the buccal surface of the human premolar, with special reference to direct bonding techniques, Am J Orthod, 76, 201, 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90121-0 Kanemura, 1999, Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces, J Dent, 27, 523, 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00008-1 Espinar-Escalona, 2012, Improvement in adhesion of the brackets to the tooth by sandblasting treatment, J Mater Sci Mater Med, 23, 605, 10.1007/s10856-011-4509-y Rogers, 2004, Dependable technique for bonding a 3 × 3 retainer, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, 231, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.027 Silverstone, 1975, Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy, Caries Res, 9, 373, 10.1159/000260179 Tay, 2005, Etched enamel structure and topography: interface with materials, 3 Whitehead, 1999, Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture, Dent Mater, 15, 79, 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00017-2 Whitehead, 1997, Changes of surface texture of enamel in vivo, J Oral Rehabil, 24, 449, 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00517.x Al Jabbari, 2012, Effect of sandblasting conditions on alumina retention in representative dental alloys, Dent Mater J, 31, 249, 10.4012/dmj.2011-210 Olsen, 1997, Comparison of shear bond strength and surface structure between conventional acid etching and air-abrasion of human enamel, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 112, 502, 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70077-5 van Waveren Hogervorst, 2000, The air-abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: a quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparison of shear bond strength, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 117, 20, 10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70244-7