Supply/demand interface for disaster resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems considering privacy and security concerns

Environment Systems and Decisions - 2023
Nikola Blagojević1, Božidar Stojadinović1
1Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe ability to swiftly restore functionality following an extreme event is an essential characteristic of a disaster resilient infrastructure system. However, the restoration of functionality of a single infrastructure system often depends on the functionality of other systems that provide resources the considered system needs to operate and recover. Furthermore, infrastructure systems are crucial for the post-disaster functional recovery of the building stock of a community. Thus, community resilience assessment and improvement require a system-of-systems perspective, considering the post-disaster performance of several interdependent infrastructure systems and the building stock at the same time. One of the principal issues in resilience assessment and improvement is that such system-of-systems consideration may require detailed information on the vulnerability and recoverability of numerous components. While such information might be available for certain systems (e.g., housing), for others, the information might be unavailable due to privacy and security concerns (e.g., electric power supply systems or buildings housing important functions). In this paper, we propose a supply/demand interface between the system-of-systems simulator, defined within the interdependent Resilience - Compositional Demand/Supply (iRe-CoDeS) framework, and the individual infrastructure system simulators. Such an interface can be used for regional recovery simulation and resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems, while allowing infrastructure system operators to maintain system’s privacy and/or security. We define a tiered supply/demand interface, where the amount of information provided by individual systems can range from system-level to component-level post-disaster evolution of resource supply and demand, assessed using expert opinion or confidential in-house models. The proposed supply/demand interfaces are illustrated in a semi-virtual case study, assessing the seismic resilience of North-East San Francisco, focusing on the effect of interdependent infrastructure on the functional recovery of residential buildings.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alipour A, Shafei B (2022) An overarching framework to assess the life-time resilience of deteriorating transportation networks in seismic-prone regions. Resilient Cities Struct 1(2):87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2022.07.002

Baroud H, Barker K, Ramirez-Marquez JE, Rocco SCM (2014) Importance measures for inland waterway network resilience. Transp Res Part E 62:55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.11.010

Blagojević N, Stojadinović B (2022) A demand-supply framework for evaluating the effect of resource and service constraints on community disaster resilience. Resilient Cities Struct 1(1):13–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2022.03.001

Blagojević N, Kipfer J, Didier M, Stojadinovic B (2020) Scenario-based resilience assessment of communities with interdependent civil infrastructure systems. In: 17th world conference on earthquake engineering (17WCEE 2020)(Virtual), 7d–0003

Blagojević N, Didier M, Stojadinović B (2022a) Evaluating NIST community disaster resilience goals using the iRe-CoDeS resilience quantification framework. In: Proceedings of 12 National Conference on Earthquake Engineering

Blagojević N, Didier M, Stojadinović B (2022b) Risk-informed resilience assessment of communities using lack of resilience surfaces. In: Proceedings of 13th international conference on structural safety and reliability (ICOSSAR 2021)

Blagojević N, Didier M, Stojadinović B (2022c) Simulating the role of transportation infrastructure for community disaster recovery. Proc Inst Civ Eng 175(3):150–159. https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.21.00018

Blagojević N, Didier M, Stojadinović B (2022d) Quantifying component importance for disaster resilience of communities with interdependent civil infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 228:108747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108747

Blagojević N, Hefti F, Henken J, Didier M, Stojadinović B (2022e) Quantifying disaster resilience of a community with interdependent civil infrastructure systems. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2022:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2052912

Blagojević N, Lauber N, Didier M, Stojadinović B (2022f) Evaluating the importance of interdependent civil infrastructure system components for disaster resilience of community housing. In: Proceedings of ASCE lifelines conference 2021/22

Blagojević N, Terzić V, Stojadinović B (2023) F-RecN + iRe-CoDeS: computational framework for regional recovery simulation using advanced building recovery models. Eng Struct 288:116156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116156

Buldyrev SV, Parshani R, Paul G, Stanley HE, Havlin S (2010) Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 464(7291):1025–1028. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08932

CRED & UNDRR (2020) Human cost of disasters: an overview of the last 20 years 2000–2019. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) and UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=YxcOEAAAQBAJ

FEMA (2020) HAZUS MH 4.2 Earthquake Model. United States of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

FEMA/NIST (2021) Recommended options for improving the built environment for post-earthquake reoccupancy and functional recovery time (FEMA P-2090/NIST SP-1254) (FEMA P-2090/NIST SP-1245). Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

GFDRR & WB (2023) Global rapid post-disaster damage estimation (GRADE) report : February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes - Türkiye Report. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) and World Bank (WB)

Giannopoulos L, Galbusera G (2016) Interconnecting GRRASP with additional platforms and tools: a feasibility study. Eur Comm Jt Res Center. https://doi.org/10.2788/9389

Hackl J, Adey BT, Lethanh N (2018) Determination of near-optimal restoration programs for transportation networks following natural hazard events using simulated annealing. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 33(8):618–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12346

Klise KA, Bynum M, Moriarty D, Murray R (2017) A software framework for assessing the resilience of drinking water systems to disasters with an example earthquake case study. Environ Modell Softw 95:420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.022

Linkov I, Fox-Lent C, Read L, Allen CR, Arnott JC, Bellini E, Coaffee J, Florin M-V, Hatfield K, Hyde I, Hynes W, Jovanovic A, Kasperson R, Katzenberger J, Keys PW, Lambert JH, Moss R, Murdoch PS, Palma-Oliveira J, Woods D (2018) Tiered approach to resilience assessment. Risk Anal 38(9):1772–1780. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12991

Max D, Salome B, Roman T, Simona E, Siddhartha G, Bozidar S (2018) Seismic resilience of water distribution and cellular communication systems after the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. J Struct Eng 144(6):04018043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002007

McKenna F, Gavrilovic S, Zsarnoczay A, Zhong K. Elhaddad W (2022) NHERI-SimCenter/R2DTool: Version 2.0.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5812513

Mohammadgholibeyki N, Koliou M, Liel AB (2023) A simple network-based probabilistic method for estimating recovery of lifeline services to buildings after an earthquake. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2023:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2177876

Portante EC, Kavicky JA, Craig BA, Talaber LE, Folga SM (2017) Modeling electric power and natural gas system interdependencies. J Infrastruct Syst 23(4):04017035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000395

Thurner L, Scheidler A, Schäfer F, Menke J-H, Dollichon J, Meier F, Meinecke S, Braun M (2018) Pandapower: an open-source python tool for convenient modeling, analysis, and optimization of electric power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 33(6):6510–6521. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2829021

Toyoda T (2008) Economic impacts of Kobe earthquake: a quantitative evaluation after 13 years. In: Proceedings of ISCRAM 2008 - 5th international conference on information systems for crisis response and management, pp 606–617. https://idl.iscram.org/files/toyoda/2008/1014_Toyoda2008.pdf

WB (2023) In: Kose MA, Ohnsorge F (eds) Falling long-term growth prospects. World Bank (WB)

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Environment Systems and Decisions

Thông tin tác giả