Summaries and recommendations of the global impression method

Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science - Tập 7 Số 5 - Trang 296-302 - 2009
Kien Trinh1
1McMaster University

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

LeLorier J, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, et al. Discrepancies Between Meta-analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials. N Engl J Med, 1997, 337(8): 536–542.

Van Tulder MW, Assendelft WJJ, Koes B, et al. Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders. Spine, 1997, 22(20): 2323–2330.

Ezzo J, Berman B, Hadhazy VA, et al. Is Acupuncture Effective for the Treatment of Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review. Pain, 2000, 86(3): 217–225.

Van Tulder MW, Touray T, Furlan AD, et al. Muscle Relaxants for Non-specific Low-back Pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2003, (2): CD004252.

Slavin RE. Best-evidence Synthesis: Why Less is More. Educational Researcher, 1978, 16(4): 15–16.

Gross AR, Hoving JL, Haines TA, et al. A Cochrane Review of Manipulation and Mobilization for Mechanical Neck Disorders. Spine, 2004, 29(14): 1541–1548.

Trinh K V, Phillips SD, Ho E, et al. Acupuncture for the Alleviation of Lateral Epicondyle Pain: A Systematic Review. Rheumatology, 2004, 43(9): 1085–1090.

Trinh KV, Graham N, Gross AR, et al. Acupuncture for Neck Disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006, (3): CD004870.

Van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative Treatment of Acute and Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of the Most Common Interventions. Spine, 1997, 22(18): 2128–2156.

Jadad AR, Moore AR, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the Quality of Reports of Randomized Clinical Trials: Is Blinding Necessary. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996, 17(1): 1–12.

Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al. Does Quality of Reports of Randomised Trials Affect Estimates of Intervention Efficacy Reported in Meta-analyses. Lancet, 1998, 352(9128): 609–613.

Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.0.0). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.

Moher D, Jadad AR, Nichol G, et al. Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: An Annotated Bibliography of Scales and Checklists. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1995, 16(1): 62–73.

Brouwers M, Johnston M, Charette M, et al. Evaluating the Role of Quality Assessment of Primary Studies in Systematic Reviews of Cancer Practice Guidelines. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2005, 5(1): 8.

Bodenheimer T. Uneasy Alliance—Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry. N Engl J Med, 2000, 342(20): 1539–1544.

Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, et al. The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis. JAMA, 1999, 282(11): 1054–1060.

Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Dinnes J, et al. A Systematic Review Finds that Diagnostic Reviews Fail to Incorporate Quality Despite Available Tools. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005, 58(1): 1–12.

Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 4.2.5), the Cochrane Collaboration, 2005.

Haraldsson BG, Gross AR, Myers CD, et al. Massage for Mechanical Neck Disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006, (3): CD004871.

Gross AR, Hoving JL, Haines TA, et al. Manipulation and Mobilization for Mechanical Neck Disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006, (1): CD004249.

Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, et al. The Ability of the Multiple Mini-interview to Predict Pre-clerkship Performance in Medical School. Academic Medicine, 2004, 79(10 Suppl): S40–S42.

Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, et al. An Admission OSCE: the Multiple Mini-interview. Medical Education, 2004, 38(3): 314–326.

Eva KW, Reiter HI, Trinh K, et al. Predictive Validity of the Multiple Mini-interview for Selecting Medical Trainees. Medical Education, 2009, 43(8): 767–775.

Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Giordano L. Selection of Medical Students at McMaster University: A Quarter Century Later. McMaster University Medical Journal, 2004, 2(1): 41–44.