Suffering in silence: a qualitative study of second victims of adverse events

BMJ Quality and Safety - Tập 23 Số 4 - Trang 325-331 - 2014
Susanne Ullström1, Magna Andreen Sachs2, Johan Hansson2, John Øvretveit2, Mats Brommels2
1Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Medical Management Centre (MMC) | Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2Karolinska Institutet

Tóm tắt

IntroductionThe term ‘second victim’ refers to the healthcare professional who experiences emotional distress following an adverse event. This distress has been shown to be similar to that of the patient—the ‘first victim’. The aim of this study was to investigate how healthcare professionals are affected by their involvement in adverse events with emphasis on the organisational support they need and how well the organisation meets those needs.Methods21 healthcare professionals at a Swedish university hospital who each had experienced an adverse event were interviewed. Data from semi-structured interviews were analysed by qualitative content analysis using QSR NVivo software for coding and categorisation.ResultsOur findings confirm earlier studies showing that emotional distress, often long-lasting, follows from adverse events. In addition, we report that the impact on the healthcare professional was related to the organisation’s response to the event. Most informants lacked organisational support or they received support that was unstructured and unsystematic. Further, the formal investigation seldom provided adequate and timely feedback to those involved. The insufficient support and lack of feedback made it more difficult to emotionally process the event and reach closure.DiscussionThis article addresses the gap between the second victim's need for organisational support and the organisational support provided. It also highlights the need for more transparency in the investigation of adverse events. Future research should address how advanced support structures can meet these needs and provide learning opportunities for the organisation. These issues are central for all hospital managers and policy makers who wish to prevent and manage adverse events and to promote a positive safety culture.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Schwappach, 2009, The emotional impact of medical error involvement on physicians: a call for leadership and organisational accountability, Swiss Med Wkly, 139, 9

Seys D Scott S Wu A . Supporting involved health care professionals (second victims) following an adverse health event: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:678–87.

10.1136/qshc.2007.025924

10.1093/intqhc/mzp025

10.1001/jama.1991.03460160067031

10.1007/BF02599161

10.1001/archfami.1996.01850390017009

Wolf, 2002, Responses and concerns of healthcare providers to medication errors, Clin Nurse Spec, 14, 278, 10.1097/00002800-200011000-00011

Rassin, 2005, Chronology of medication errors by nurses: accumulation of stresses and PTSD symptoms, Issues Ment Health Nurs, 2, 1

Waterman, 2007, The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada, Jt Comm J Qual Saf, 22, 467

10.1136/qshc.2009.032870

Edrees, 2011, Health care workers as second victims of medical errors, Pol Arch Med Wewn, 121, 101

Gazoni, 2012, The impact of perioperative catastrophes on anesthesiologists: results of a national survey, Anesth Analg, 113, 596, 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318227524e

Stangierski, 2012, Medical errors—not only patients’ problem, Arch Med Sci, 8, 569, 10.5114/aoms.2012.29539

10.1136/qshc.2002.003657

10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726

10.1001/jama.296.9.1071

10.1001/archsurg.2010.292

Aleccia J . Nursés suicide highlights twin tragedies of medical errors. msnbc.com web site. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43529641/ns/health-health_care/ (accessed 27 Jun 2011).

Arndt, 1994, Medication errors. Research in practice: how drug mistakes affect self-esteem, Nurs Times, 90, 27

10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

10.1177/1049732305276687

10.1016/j.jen.2011.01.001

Nieva, 2003, Safety culture assessment; a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations, Qual Saf Health Care, 12, ii17

10.1186/1472-6963-13-332