Kế thừa các chức năng, từ Darwin đến Dohrn

Amundson, R. (2005). The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Arendt, D., & Nubler-Jung, K. (1996). Common ground plans in early brain development in mice and flies. BioEssays, 18, 255–259. Bowler, P. (1996). Life’s splendid drama: Evolutionary biology and the reconstruction of life’s ancestry 1860–1940. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Breidbach, O., & Ghiselin, M. T. (2007). Anton Dohrn and the problems of 19th century phylogenetic morphology. Theory in Biosciences, 125, 173–179. Brooke, J. H. (2009). ‘Laws impressed on matter by the Creator’? The origin and the question of religion. In R. J. Richards & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the ‘Origin of Species’ (pp. 256–274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Browne, J. (2003). Charles Darwin: A biography, vol. 2: The power of place. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Cope, E. D. (1871). The method of creation of organic forms. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 12(86), 229–263. Darlington, C. D. (1959). Darwin’s place in history. London: Blackwell. Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species. London: John Murray. Darwin, C. R. (1868). The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: John Murray. Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray. Darwin, C. R. (1872). On the origin of species (6th ed.). London: John Murray. De Robertis, E. M., & Sasai, Y. (1996). A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in bilateria. Nature, 380, 37–40. Di Gregorio, M. A. (2008). Zoology. In P. Bowler & J. V. Pickstone (Eds.), The Cambridge history of science (Vol. 6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dohrn, A. (1875). Der Ursprung der Wirbelthiere und das Princip des Functionswechsels: genealogische Skizzen. Leipzig: Engelmann. Dohrn A., (1994). The origin of vertebrates and the principle of succession of functions: Genealogical sketches, vol. 16(1) (M. T. Ghiselin, History and philosophy of the life sciences, Trans.), pp. 19–96. Fokin, & Groeben, (2008) Russian scientists at the Naples zoological station 1874–1934. In S. I. Fokin & Ch. Groeben (Eds.), Napoli: Giannini. Ghiselin, M. T. (1994). “Introduction” to A. Dohrn, “The origin of vertebrates and the principle of succession of functions”. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 16(1), 3–18. Gottlieb, G. (1991) Individual development and evolution: The genesis of novel behavior. New York: Oxford University Press. Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press. Gould, S. J. ([1985] 1991). Not necessarily a wing. In Gould S. J. (Ed.) Bully for brontosaurus (pp. 139–151). New York: W. W. Norton & Co. Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation—A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15. Groeben, C. (Ed.). (1982) Charles Darwin–Anton Dohrn. Correspondence. (introd. by G. Montalenti) Napoli: Macchiaroli. Groeben, C., (Ed.) (1993) Karl Ernst von Baer–Anton Dohrn. Correspondence (C. Groeben, Trans., introd. by J. M. Oppenheimer) Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Ser., 83, 3:1–156. Heuss, Th. (1991). Anton Dohrn: A life for science. In Ch. Groeben (Ed.) Berlin: Springer. Kühn, A. (1950). Anton Dohrn und die Zoologie seiner Zeit. Napoli: Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica. Lankester, E. R. (1875). Dohrn on the origin of the vertebrata and on the principle of succession of functions. Nature, 12, 479–481. Levit, G. S., & Hoßfeld, U. (2006). The forgotten ‘old-Darwinian’ synthesis: The evolutionary theory of Ludwig H. Plate (1862–1937). NTM, N.S., 14, 9–25. Mayr, E. (1960). The emergence of evolutionary novelties. In S. Tax (Ed.), Evolution after Darwin (Vol. I, pp. 349–380). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Milne, Edwards H. (1857). Leçons sur la physiologie et l’anatomie comparée de l’homme et des animaux (Vol. I). Paris: Masson. Mivart, G. J. (1871). On the genesis of species. London: MacMillan. Müller, G. B., & Newman, S. A. (2005). The innovation triad: An Evo-Devo agenda. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 304B, 487–503. Müller, G. B., & Wagner, G. P. (1991). Novelty in evolution: Restructuring the concept. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 22, 229–256. Murphy, J. J. (1869). Habit and intelligence (Vol. I). London: MacMillan. Nyhart, L. K. (2009). Embryology and morphology. In R. J. Richards & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the ‘Origin of Species’ (pp. 194–215). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Regner, A. C. (2008). Charles Darwin versus George Mivart: The role of polemics in science. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and Confrontation. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins. Russell, E. S. (1916). Form and function. A contribution to the history of animal morphology. London: John Murray. Sewertzoff, A. N. (1931). Morphologische Gesetzmäßigkeiten der Evolution. Jena: G. Fischer. Shubin, N., Tabin, C., & Carroll, S. (2009). Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature, 457, 818–823. Strausfeld, N. J. (2010). Brain homology: Dohrn of a new era? Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 76, 165–167. Uschmann, G. (1939). Der morphobiologische Vervollkommnungsbegriff bei Goethe und seine problemgeschichtlichen Zusammenhänge. Jena: G. Fischer. Wright, C. ([1871] 1877). The genesis of species. In C. Wright (Ed.) Philosophical discussions (pp. 126–167). New York: Holt.