Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review
Tóm tắt
Background. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is increasingly used by community and academic partners to examine health inequities and promote health equity in communities. Despite increasing numbers of CBPR partnerships, there is a lack of consensus in the field regarding what defines partnership success and how to measure factors contributing to success in long-standing CBPR partnerships. Aims. To identify indicators and measures of success in long-standing CBPR partnerships as part of a larger study whose aim is to develop and validate an instrument measuring success across CBPR partnerships. Methods. The Joanna Briggs Institute framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guided searches of three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus) for articles published between 2007 and 2017 and evaluating success in CBPR partnerships existing longer than 4 years. Results. Twenty-six articles met search criteria. We identified 3 key domains and 7 subdomains with 28 underlying indicators of success. Six partnerships developed or used instruments to measure their success; only one included reliability or validity data. Discussion. CBPR partnerships reported numerous intersecting partner, partnership, and outcome indicators important for success. These results, along with data from key informant interviews with community and academic partners and advisement from a national panel of CBPR experts, will inform development of items for an instrument measuring CBPR partnership success. Conclusion. The development of a validated instrument measuring indicators of success will allow long-standing CBPR partnerships to evaluate their work toward achieving health equity and provide a tool for newly forming CBPR partnerships aiming to achieve long-term success.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cacari-Stone L., 2018, Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes, 3, 277
Chino M., 2012, International Public Health Journal, 4, 235
Clarivate Analytics. (2017). EndNote (Version X7). Retrieved from https://endnote.com/
Ferré C. D., 2010, Ethnicity & Disease, 20, S2
Israel B. A., 2019, Measurement approaches to partnership success: Theory and methods for measuring success in long-standing CBPR partnerships
Israel B. A., 2013, Methods for community-based participatory research for health, 369
Israel B. A., 2005, Methods for community-based participatory research for health, 255
Israel B. A., 2018, Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes, 3, 31
James S., 2011, Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 5, 399, 10.1353/cpr.2011.a462767
Joanna Briggs Institute. (2015). Joanna Briggs institute reviewers’ manual: 2015 edition. Adelaide, South Australia, Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute. Retrieved from http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/Reviewers-Manual_Methodology-for-JBI-Scoping-Reviews_2015_v2.pdf
Johnson J. C., Hayden U. T., Thomas N., Groce-Martin J., Henry T., Guerra T. Kumanyika S. (2009). Building community participatory research coalitions from the ground up: The Philadelphia area research community coalition. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 3, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.0.0052
Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media. R. (2016). Zotero. Fairfax, VA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.zotero.org/download
Sofaer S., 2000, Working together, moving ahead: A manual to support effective community health coalitions
Tsui E., 2013, Methods for community-based participatory research for health, 2, 517
Wallerstein N. B., 2008, Community based participatory research for health, 2, 371