Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Sở thích về nền của các loài tôm tít xâm lấn đồng sống, Dikerogammarus villosus và Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, trong điều kiện hiện trường và phòng thí nghiệm
Tóm tắt
Hai loài tôm tít Ponto-Caspian, Dikerogammarus villosus và Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, đã mở rộng phạm vi địa lý của chúng từ Đông Âu vào nước Anh trong những năm gần đây. Nghiên cứu này đại diện cho một trong những nghiên cứu đầu tiên xem xét sự phân bố và sở thích môi trường sống của các quần thể đồng sống của D. haemobaphes và D. villosus thông qua các thí nghiệm thực địa và phòng thí nghiệm tại Vương quốc Anh. Các cuộc khảo sát thực địa tại một hồ chứa thấp bị xâm lấn gần đây ở Vương quốc Anh được bổ sung bằng các thí nghiệm mesocosm trong phòng thí nghiệm để kiểm tra sở thích nền của các quần thể đồng sống của D. villosus và D. haemobaphes. Kết quả từ nghiên cứu thực địa chỉ ra rằng D. haemobaphes chiếm ưu thế trong cộng đồng động vật không xương sống lớn trong hồ chứa và thể hiện một sự ưa thích mạnh mẽ đối với các nền đá cuội lớn và nền nhân tạo. D. villosus xuất hiện với số lượng thấp hơn nhưng thể hiện một sở thích mạnh mẽ đối với nền đá cuội thô. Một loài tôm tít xâm lấn thứ ba, Crangonyx pseudogracilis, chủ yếu bị giới hạn trong các môi trường sống cát/bùn. Các thí nghiệm mesocosm trong phòng thí nghiệm đã rõ ràng hỗ trợ các quan sát thực địa về D. villosus và D. haemobaphes, với cả hai loài thể hiện sở thích đối với các nền đá cuội. Kết quả từ nghiên cứu làm nổi bật tầm quan trọng của việc định hình môi trường sống vật lý khi điều tra về các cuộc xâm lấn sinh học và cho thấy rằng sự sẵn có của môi trường sống có thể ảnh hưởng đến mức độ và tốc độ mà sự mở rộng phạm vi của các loài tôm tít xâm lấn mới xảy ra.
Từ khóa
#Dikerogammarus villosus #Dikerogammarus haemobaphes #tôm tít xâm lấn #thực địa #phòng thí nghiệm #sự phân bố #sở thích môi trường sốngTài liệu tham khảo
Bacela K, Konopacka A, Grabowski M (2009) Reproductive biology of Dikerogammarus haemobaphes: an invasive gammarid (Crustacea: Amphipoda) colonizing running waters in Central Europe. Biol Invasions 11:2055–2066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9496-2
Bacela-Spychalska K, van der Velde G (2013) There is more than one ‘killer shrimp’: trophic position and predatory abilities of invasive amphipods of Ponto-Caspian origin. Freshw Biol 58:730–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12078
Benoît HP, Post JR, Barbet AD (2000) Recruitment dynamics and size structure in experimental populations of the mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis. Copeia 2000:216–221. https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2000)2000[0216:RDASSI]2.0.CO;2
Bij de Vaate A, Jazdzewski K, Ketelaars HA, Gollasch S, Van der Velde G (2002) Geographical patterns in range extension of Ponto-Caspian macroinvertebrate species in Europe. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1159–1174. https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-098
Boets P, Lock K, Messiaen M, Goethals PL (2010) Combining data-driven methods and lab studies to analyse the ecology of Dikerogammarus villosus. Ecol Inf 5:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2009.12.005
Bollache L, Dick JT, Farnsworth KD, Montgomery WI (2008) Comparison of the functional responses of invasive and native amphipods. Biol Lett 4:166–169. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0554
Bovy HC, Barrios-O’Neill D, Emmerson MC, Aldridge DC, Dick JT (2015) Predicting the predatory impacts of the “demon shrimp” Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, on native and previously introduced species. Biol Invasions 17:597–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0751-9
Constable D, Birkby NJ (2016) The impact of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus haemobaphes on leaf litter processing in UK rivers. Aquat Ecol 50:273–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-016-9574-3
De Gelder S, van der Velde G, Platvoet D, Leung N, Dorenbosch M, Hendriks HWM, Leuven RSEW (2016) Competition for shelter sites: testing a possible mechanism for gammarid species displacements. Basic Appl Ecol 17:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2016.01.008
Devin S, Piscart C, Beisel JN, Moreteau JC (2003) Ecological traits of the amphipod invader Dikerogammarus villosus on a mesohabitat scale. Arch Hydrobiol 158:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0158-0043
Dick JT, Platvoet D (2000) Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:977–983. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1099
Dick JT, Platvoet D, Kelly DW (2002) Predatory impact of the freshwater invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-074
Dobson M (2013) Identifying invasive freshwater shrimps and isopods, Revised edn. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside
Dodd JA, Dick JT, Alexander ME, MacNeil C, Dunn AM, Aldridge DC (2014) Predicting the ecological impacts of a new freshwater invader: functional responses and prey selectivity of the ‘killer shrimp’, Dikerogammarus villosus, compared to the native Gammarus pulex. Freshw Biol 59:337–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12268
Gallardo B, Aldridge DC (2013a) Priority setting for invasive species management: risk assessment of Ponto-Caspian invasive species into Great Britain. Ecol Appl 23:352–364. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1018.1
Gallardo B, Aldridge DC (2013b) The ‘dirty dozen’: socio-economic factors amplify the invasion potential of 12 high-risk aquatic invasive species in Great Britain and Ireland. J Appl Ecol 50:757–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12079
GBNNSS (2017) GB non-native species secretariat species alerts. http://www.nonnativespecies.org/alerts/index.cfm. Accessed 03 Mar 2017
Gledhill T, Sutcliffe DW, Williams WD (1993) British freshwater Crustacea Malacostraca: a key with ecological notes. Freshwater Biological Association no. 52: Cumbria
Grabowski M, Bacela K, Konopacka A (2007) How to be an invasive gammarid (Amphipoda: Gammaroidea)—comparison of life history traits. Hydrobiologia 590:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0759-6
Gruszka P, Woźniczka A (2008) Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinski, 1894) in the River Odra estuary—another invader threatening Baltic Sea coastal lagoons. Aquat Invasions 3:395–403. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2008.3.4.5
Havel JE, Lee CE, Vander Zanden JM (2005) Do reservoirs facilitate invasions into landscapes? Bioscience 55:518–525. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055
Hesselschwerdt J, Necker J, Wantzen KM (2008) Gammarids in Lake Constance: habitat segregation between the invasive Dikerogammarus villosus and the indigenous Gammarus roeselii. Fundam Appl Limnol 173:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2008/0173-0177
Jackson MC (2015) Interactions among multiple invasive animals. Ecology 96:2035–2041. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0171.1
Jermacz Ł, Dzierżyńska A, Poznańska M, Kobak J (2015) Experimental evaluation of preferences of an invasive Ponto-Caspian gammarid Pontogammarus robustoides (Amphipoda, Gammaroidea) for mineral and plant substrata. Hydrobiologia 746:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1963-9
Johnson PT, Vander Olden JD, Zanden MJ (2008) Dam invaders: impoundments facilitate biological invasions into freshwaters. Front Ecol Environ 6:357–363. https://doi.org/10.1890/070156
Jourdan J, Westerwald B, Kiechle A, Chen W, Streit B, Klaus S, Oetken M, Plath M (2016) Pronounced species turnover, but no functional equivalence in leaf consumption of invasive amphipods in the river Rhine. Biol Invasions 18:763–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-1046-5
Kinzler W, Kley A, Mayer G, Waloszek D, Maier G (2009) Mutual predation between and cannibalism within several freshwater gammarids: Dikerogammarus villosus versus one native and three invasives. Aquat Ecol 43:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-008-9206-7
Kley A, Maier G (2005) An example of niche partitioning between Dikerogammarus villosus and other invasive and native gammarids: a field study. J Limnol 64:85–88. https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2005.85
Kley A, Maier G (2006) Reproductive characteristics of invasive gammarids in the Rhine-Main-Danube catchment, South Germany. Limnology 36:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2006.01.002
Kley A, Kinzler W, Schank Y, Mayer G, Waloszek D, Maier G (2009) Influence of substrate preference and complexity on co-existence of two non-native gammarideans (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Aquat Ecol 43:1047–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-009-9242-y
Kobak J, Jermacz Ł, Dzierżyńska-Białończyk A (2015) Substratum preferences of the invasive killer shrimp Dikerogammarus villosus. J Zool 297:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12252
Kobak J, Rachalewski M, Bącela-Spychalska K (2016) Conquerors or exiles? Impact of interference competition among invasive Ponto-Caspian gammarideans on their dispersal rates. Biol Invasions 18:1953–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1140-3
Koester M, Bayer B, Gergs R (2016) Is Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea, Gammaridae) a ‘killer shrimp’ in the River Rhine system? Hydrobiologia 768:299–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2558-9
Krisp H (2004) Substratpräferenz, Aktivität, Prädationsneigung und Wachstum von neozoischen und heimischen Gammaridenarten in Laborexperimenten. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ulm
Leuven RS, van der Velde G, Baijens I, Snijders J, van der Zwart C, Lenders HR, bij de Vaate A (2009) The river Rhine: a global highway for dispersal of aquatic invasive species. Biol Invasions 11:1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9491-7
MacNeil C, Dick JTA (2014) The enemy of my enemy is my friend: intraguild predation between invaders and natives facilitates coexistence with shared invasive prey. Biol Lett 10:20140298. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0398
MacNeil C, Platvoet D (2013) Could artificial structures such as fish passes facilitate the establishment and spread of the ‘killer shrimp’ Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in river systems? Aquat Conserv 23:667–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2337
MacNeil C, Dick JTA, Elwood RW (1997) The trophic ecology of freshwater Gammarus spp. (Crustacea: Amphipoda): problems and perspectives concerning the functional feeding group concept. Biol Rev 72:349–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00017.X
MacNeil C, Platvoet D, Dick JT (2008) Potential roles for differential body size and microhabitat complexity in mediating biotic interactions within invasive freshwater amphipod assemblages. Fundam Appl Limnol 172:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2008/0172-0175
MacNeil C, Platvoet D, Dick JDA, Fielding N, Constable AJ, Hall N, Aldridge D, Renals T, Diamond M (2010) The Ponto-Caspian ‘killer shrimp’, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894), invades the British Isles. Aquat Invasions 5:441–445. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2010.5.4.15
MacNeil C, Dick JTA, Platvoet D, Briffa M (2011) Direct and indirect effects of species displacements: an invading freshwater amphipod can disrupt leaf-litter processing and shredder efficiency. J N Am Benthol Soc 30:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1899/10-056.1
McGrath KE, Peeters ET, Beijer JA, Scheffer M (2007) Habitat-mediated cannibalism and microhabitat restriction in the stream invertebrate Gammarus pulex. Hydrobiologia 589:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0731-5
Medley KA (2010) Niche shifts during the global invasion of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus Skuse (Culicidae), revealed by reciprocal distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:122–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00497.x
Müller JC, Schramm S, Seitz A (2002) Genetic and morphological differentiation of Dikerogammarus invaders and their invasion history in Central Europe. Freshw Biol 47:2039–2048. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00944.x
Piscart C, Roussel J, Dick JT, Grosbois G, Marmonier P (2011) Effects of coexistence on habitat use and trophic ecology of interacting native and invasive amphipods. Freshw Biol 56:325–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02500.x
Platvoet D, Van Der Velde G, Dick JT, Li S (2009a) Flexible omnivory in Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894) (Amphipoda)—Amphipod Pilot Species Project (AMPIS) Report 5, Flexible omnivory in Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894) (Amphipoda)—Amphipod Pilot Species Project (AMPIS) Report 5. Crustaceana 82:703–720. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854009X423201
Platvoet D, Dick JT, MacNeil C, Van Riel MC, Van der Velde G (2009b) Invader–invader interactions in relation to environmental heterogeneity leads to zonation of two invasive amphipods, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky) and Gammarus tigrinus Sexton: amphipod pilot species project (AMPIS) report 6. Biol Invasions 11:2085–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9488-2
Pöckl M (2009) Success of the invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus by life history traits and reproductive capacity. Biol Invasions 11:2021–2041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9485-5
Rewicz T, Grabowski M, MacNeil C, Bacela-Spychalska K (2014) The profile of a ‘perfect’ invader—the case of killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus. Aquat Invasions 9:267–288
Ricciardi A (2001) Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an “invasional meltdown” occurring in the Great Lakes? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:2513–2525. https://doi.org/10.1139/f01-178
Ricciardi A, MacIsaac HJ (2000) Recent mass invasion of the North American Great Lakes by Ponto-Caspian species. Trends Ecol Evol 15:62–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01745-0
Robinson BW, Wilson DS (1996) Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity in a trophically polymorphic population of pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus). Evol Ecol 10:631–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237711
Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00939.x
Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010086329619
Van der Velde G, Leuven RS, Platvoet D, Bacela K, Huijbregts MA, Hendriks HW, Kruijt D (2009) Environmental and morphological factors influencing predatory behaviour by invasive non-indigenous gammaridean species. Biol Invasions 11:2043–2054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9500-x
Van Riel MC, Healy EP, Van der Velde G, Bij de Vaate A (2007) Interference competition among native and invader amphipods. Acta Oecol 31(3):282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2006.12.006
Van Riel MC, Van der Velde G, Bij de Vaate A (2009) Interference competition between alien invasive gammaridean species. Biol Invasions 11:2119–2132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9486-4
Vanderploeg HA, Nalepa TF, Jude DJ, Mills EL, Holeck KT, Liebig JR, Grigorovich IA, Ojaveer H (2002) Dispersal and emerging ecological impacts of Ponto-Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1209–1228. https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-087