Subsidy Entrepreneurs: an Inquiry into Firms Seeking Public Grants
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aerts K, Czarnitzki D, Fier A (2006) Econometric evaluation of public r&d policies: current state of the art. Technical report, K.U.Leuven and ZEW Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW)
Afcha S (2012) Analyzing the interaction between R&D subsidies and firm’s innovation strategy. J Technol Manag Innov 7(3):57–70
Akay A (2012) Finite-sample comparison of alternative methods for estimating dynamic panel data models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 27(7):1189–1204
Arqué-Castells P, Mohnen P (2015) Sunk costs, extensive R&D subsidies and permanent inducement effects. J Ind Econ 63(3):458–494
Aschhoff B (2010) Who gets the money?. Jahrbücher r Natl Stat 230(5):522–546
Baldwin RE, Robert-Nicoud F (2007) Entry and asymmetric lobbying: why governments pick losers. J Eur Econ Assoc 5(5):1064–1093
Baumol WJ (1990) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy
Becker L (2015) Effectiveness of public innovation support in europe: does public support foster turnover, employment and labour productivity? Technical report, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics
Blanes JV, Isabel B (2004) Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of spanish manufacturing firms. Res Policy 33(10):1459–1476
Bronzini R, Iachini E (2010) Are incentives to R&D effective? Evidence of heterogeneous effects from a regional program in italy. Technical report, Banca d’Italia, mimeo
Buigues P-A, Sekkat K (2011) Public subsidies to business: an international comparison, Journal of Industry. Compet Trade 11(1):1–24
Carreira C, Silva F (2010) No deep pockets: some stylized empirical results on firms’ financial constraints. J Econ Surv 24(4):731–753
Catozzella A, Vivarelli M (2011) Beyond additionality: are innovation subsidies counterproductive?, Technical report. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5746
Cerulli G, Poti B (2008) Evaluating the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D activity: an application to Italy using the community innovation survey. Technical report, Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth-Moncalieri (TO)
Che Y-K, Gale I (1997) Rent dissipation when rent seekers are budget constrained. Publ Choice 92(1-2):109–126
Cheng H, Hanbing F, Takeo H, Dezhuang H (2019) Do innovation subsidies make chinese firms more innovative? evidence from the china employer employee survey, Working Paper 25432, National Bureau of Economic Research
Criscuolo C, Ralf M, Henry O, Van Reenen J (2012) The causal effects of an industrial policy, Working Paper 17842, National Bureau of Economic Research
Czarnitzki D, Delanote J (2014) R&d subsidies to small young companies: should the independent and high-tech ones be favored in the granting process?. Technical report, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW)
Dahlberg M, Johansson E (2002) On the vote-purchasing behavior of incumbent governments. Amer Polit Sci Rev 96(1):27–40
David PA, Hall BH, Toole AA (2000) Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Res Policy 29(4):497–529
Du J, Mickiewicz T (2016) Subsidies, rent seeking and performance: being young, small or private in China. J Bus Ventur 31(1):22–38
Feldman MP, Kelley MR (2001) Winning an award from the advanced technology program: pursuing r&d strategies in the public interest and benefiting from a halo effect, Technical report, NISTIR 6577, US Department of Commerce
González X, Jaumandreu J, Consuelo P (2005) Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness. RAND Journal of Economics 36(4):930–950
Goolsbee A (1998) Does government R&D policy mainly benefit scientists and engineers?. Amer Econ Rev 88(2):298–302
Grossman GM, Helpman E (1994) Protection for sale. Amer Econ Rev 84 (4):833–850
Grossmann M, Dietl H (2012) Asymmetric contests with liquidity constraints. Publ Choice 150(3-4):691–713
Guo D, Guo J, Jiang K (2014) Government subsidized R&D and innovation outputs: an empirical analysis of china’s innofund program, Technical Report 494, Stanford Center for International Development Working Paper Series
Gustafsson A, Stephan A, Hallman A, Karlsson N (2016) The “sugar rush” from innovation subsidies: a robust political economy perspective. Empirica 43 (4):729–756
Heijs J (2005) Identification of firms supported by technology policies: the case of spanish low interest credits. Sci Publ Policy 32(3):219–230
Huergo E, Trenado M (2010) The application for and the awarding of low-interest credits to finance R&D projects. Rev Ind Organ 37(3):237–259
Hussinger K (2008) RḊ and subsidies at the firm level: an application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models. J Appl Econ 23(6):729–747
Klein PG, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2010) Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. Eur Manag Rev 7(1):1–15
Klette TJ, Møen J, Griliches Z (2000) Do subsidies to commercial R&D, reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies. Res Policy 29(4):471–495
Klette TJ, Møen J (2012) R&D investment responses to R&D subsidies: a theoretical analysis and a microeconometric study. World Rev Sci Technol Sustain Dev 9(2-4):169–203
Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70(2):317–341
Lööf H, Hesmati A (2004) The impact of public funding on private r&d investment. new evidence from a firm level innovation study (additionality or crowding out? on the effectiveness of R&D subsidies) Technical report, CECIS, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Lucas DS, Fuller CS (2017) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive—relative to what?. J Bus Ventur Insights 7:45–49
OECD (2016) OECD reviews of innovation policy: Sweden 2016, Technical report. OECD Publishing, Paris
Riksrevisionen (2016) Statliga stöd till innovation och företagande, Riksrevisionen, RiR 2016:22, Stockholm
Rovigatti G, Mollisi V (2016) PRODEST: Stata Module for production function estimation based on the control function approach. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics
Silva AM, Silva ST, Carneiro A (2017) Determinants of grant decisions in R&D subsidy programmes: evidence from firms and S&T organisations in portugal. Sci Publ Policy 44(5):683–697
Söderblom A, Samuelsson M, Wiklund J, Sandberg R (2015) Inside the black box of outcome additionality: effects of early-stage government subsidies on resource accumulation and new venture performance. Res Policy 44(8):1501–1512
Svaleryd H, Vlachos J (2009) Political rents in a non-corrupt democracy. J Publ Econ 93(3-4):355–372
Takalo T, Tanayama T, Toivanen O (2013) Estimating the benefits of targeted R&D subsidies. Rev Econ Stat 95(1):255–272
Tillväxtanalys (2014) Företagsstöd till innovativa små och medelstora företag, Technical Report 16, Tillväxtanalys
Tillväxtanalys (2015) Tillväxt genom stöd: en bok om statligt stöd till näringslivet, The Swedish Agency of Growth Policy Evaluations
Tingvall PG, Videnord J (2018) Regional differences in effects of publicly sponsored R&D grants on SME performance. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0085-6
Tullock G (1980) Efficient rent seeking. In: T. R. Buchanan JM, Tullock G (eds) Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, pp 97–112
Wooldridge JM (2005) Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. J Appl Econ 20(1):39–54
Wooldridge JM (2009) On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Econ Lett 104(3):112–114
Yamazaki T (2008) On the existence and uniqueness of pure-strategy nash equilibrium in asymmetric rent-seeking contests. J Publ Econ Theory 10(2):317–327