Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance

International Business Review - Tập 14 Số 2 - Trang 227-248 - 2005
Julian Birkinshaw1, Neil Hood2, Stephen Young2
1London Business School, Regents’ Park, London NW1 4SA, UK
2Strathclyde International Business Unit, Strathclyde Business School, Stenhouse Building, 173 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G4 0RQ, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Barney, 1991, Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 99, 10.1177/014920639101700108

Bartlett, 1989

Birkinshaw, 1996, How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost, Journal of International Business Studies, 27, 467, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490845

Birkinshaw, 1997, Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 207, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199703)18:3<207::AID-SMJ864>3.0.CO;2-Q

Birkinshaw, 2000

Birkinshaw, 1998, Multinational subsidiary development: Capability evolution and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies, Academy of Management Review, 23, 773, 10.5465/amr.1998.1255638

Birkinshaw, 1998, Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 221, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<221::AID-SMJ948>3.0.CO;2-P

Birkinshaw, 2000, Multinational enterprise and the knowledge economy: Leveraging global practises

Crookell, 1987, Managing Canadian subsidiaries in a free trade environment, Sloan Management Review, 29, 71

Galunic, 1996, The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology and, multidivisional corporations, Organization Science, 7, 255, 10.1287/orsc.7.3.255

Ghoshal, 1988, Creation, adoption and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 365, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490388

Ghoshal, 1990, The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network, Academy of Management Review, 15, 603, 10.5465/amr.1990.4310825

Gupta, 1994, Organizing for knowledge within MNCs, International Business Review, 3, 443, 10.1016/0969-5931(94)90033-7

Hedlund, 1986, The hypermodern MNC: A heterarchy?, Human Resource Management, 25, 9, 10.1002/hrm.3930250103

Jarillo, 1990, Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal., 11, 501, 10.1002/smj.4250110702

Molloy, 1999

Nobel, 1998, Patterns of control and communication in international research and development units, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 479, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<479::AID-SMJ954>3.3.CO;2-L

Paterson, 2002, The development of subsidiary-managemnt research: Review and theoretical analysis, International Business Review, 11, 139, 10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00053-1

Porter, 1980

Porter, 1990

Prahalad, 1981, An approach to strategic control in MNCs, Sloan Management Review, Summer, 5

Prahalad, 1987

Taggart, 1997, Autonomy and procedural justice: A framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy, Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 51, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490093

Wernerfelt, 1984, A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171, 10.1002/smj.4250050207

Westney, 1994, Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation

White, 1984, Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada, Business Quarterly, Summer, 59

Young, 1994, Multinational enterprises and regional economic development, Regional Studies, 28, 6577, 10.1080/00343409412331348566

Young, 2004, Centralization and autonomy: Back to the future, International Business Review, 13, 215, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2003.06.002