Submarine hydrodynamics for off-design conditions

Bettle MC, Toxopeus SL, Gerber AG (2010) Calculation of bottom clearance effects on Walrus submarine hydrodynamics. Int Shipbuild Prog 57(3–4):101–125. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-2010-0065 Carrica PM, Kerkvliet M, Quadvlieg FHHA et al (2016) CFD simulations and experiments of a maneuvering generic submarine and prognosis for simulation of near surface operation. In: 31\({{\rm st}}\) symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Monterey, CA Devenport WJ, Simpson RL, Dewitz MB et al (1992) Effects of a leading-edge fillet on the flow past an appendage-body junction. AIAA J 30(9):2177–2182. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11201 Eisfeld B, Brodersen O (2005) Advanced turbulence modelling and stress analysis for the DLR-F6 configuration. In: 23\({{\rm rd}}\) AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Toronto, Canada, AIAA2005-4727. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-4727 Gertler M (1950) Resistance experiments on a systematic series of streamlined bodies of revolution—for application to the design of high-speed submarines. Tech. Rep. C-297, David W. Taylor Model Basin, Washington, DC Hay AD (1947) Flow about semi-submerged cylinders of finite length. Princeton University Report, Princeton, NJ Joubert PN (2006) Some aspects of submarine design—part 2. Shape of a submarine 2026. Tech. Rep. DSTO-TR-1920, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Fishermans Bend, Victoria, Australia Kerkvliet M (2013) Influence on the numerical uncertainty of a generic submarine model by changing the wall-normal distribution of the wall-bounded grid cells. In: 16th numerical towing tank symposium (NuTTS). Müllheim, Germany, pp 78–83 Klaij CM, Hoekstra M, Vaz G (2018) Design, analysis and verification of a volume-of-fluid model with interface-capturing scheme. Comput Fluids 170:324–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.05.016 Klapwijk MD, Rotte G, Kerkvliet M et al (2017) Modelling of the plume of a submerged exhaust system. In: 20\({{\rm th}}\) numerical towing tank symposium (NuTTS), Wageningen, The Netherlands Kok JC, Dol HS, Oskam B et al (2004) Extra-Large Eddy Simulation of massively separated flows. In: 42\({{\rm nd}}\) AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reno, Nevada, AIAA 2004-264. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-264 Lee SK, Manovski P, Kumar C (2018) Wake of a DST submarine model captured by stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry. In: 21\({{\rm st}}\) Australasian fluid mechanics conference, Adelaide, Australia NATO AVT-301 Task Group (2022) Flowfield prediction for manoeuvring underwater vehicles. NATO TR-AVT-301 Report Overpelt B (2014) Innovation in the hydrodynamic support for design of submarines. In: 12\({{\rm th}}\) international naval engineering conference and exhibition (INEC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands Overpelt B, Nienhuis B (2014) Bow shape design for increased surface performance of an SSK submarine. In: Warship 2014: naval submarines and UUV’s, Bath, UK Overpelt B, Nienhuis B, Anderson B (2015) Free running manoeuvring model tests on a modern generic SSK class submarine (BB2). In: Pacific international maritime conference, Sydney, Australia Power JL (1977) Drag, flow transition, and laminar separation on nine bodies of revolution having different forebody shapes. Tech. Rep. 77-0065, David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Bethesda, MD Raven HC (1996) A solution method for the nonlinear ship wave resistance problem. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology Renilson MR (2018) Submarine hydrodynamics, 2nd edn. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79057-2 Torunski B (2018) Computational analysis of the free surface effects on a BB2 submarine undergoing horizontal maneuvers. Master’s thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada Toxopeus SL (2008) Viscous-flow calculations for bare hull DARPA SUBOFF submarine at incidence. Int Shipbuild Prog 55(3):227–251. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-2008-0048 Toxopeus SL, Atsavapranee P, Wolf E et al (2012) Collaborative CFD exercise for a submarine in a steady turn. In: 31\({{\rm st}}\) international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, OMAE2012-83573. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83573 Toxopeus SL, Kuin R, Kerkvliet M et al (2014) Improvement of resistance and wake field of an underwater vehicle by optimising the fin-body junction flow with CFD. In: 33\({{\rm rd}}\) international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE), San Francisco, CA, OMAE2014-23784. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23784 Toxopeus SL, Bettle MC, Uroić T et al (2019) NATO AVT-301 collaborative exercise: CFD predictions for BB2 generic submarine, phase 0—pre-test computations. In: NATO STO AVT-307 research symposium on separated flow: prediction, measurement and assessment for air and sea vehicles, Trondheim, Norway, STO-TR-AVT-307-22 van Terwisga TJC, Hooft JP (1988) Hydrodynamic support in the design of submarines. In: Bicentennial maritime symposium. Australia, Sydney, pp 241–251 Vaz G, Jaouen FAP, Hoekstra M (2009) Free-surface viscous flow computations. Validation of URANS code FreSCo. In: 28\({{\rm th}}\) international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE), Honolulu, Hawaii, OMAE2009-79398. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2009-79398 Vaz G, Toxopeus SL, Holmes S (2010) Calculation of manoeuvring forces on submarines using two viscous-flow solvers. In: 29\({{\rm th}}\) international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE), Shanghai, China, OMAE2010-20373. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2010-20373