Subjectivities and micro‐processes of change in accounting practices: a case study

Emerald - Tập 9 Số 2 - Trang 206-236 - 2013
AnnickAncelin‐Bourguignon1, OlivierSaulpic2, PhilippeZarlowski2
1ESSEC Business School, Paris, France
2Management Control Department, ESCP Europe, Paris, France

Tóm tắt

PurposeWhile new institutionalism‐inspired accounting literature has opened up new perspectives for the study of micro‐processes of change in accounting practices, little is still known about how individuals subjectively experience these processes. In this paper, the authors propose to study the role of subjectivities in the institutionalization of new accounting practices.Design/methodology/approachBased on an extension of Hasselbladh and Kallinikos' framework, the authors analyze the implementation of a new performance management and measurement system in the division of a large French public sector firm. The authors' research is based on the company's internal archives, samples of the new performance scorecard, interviews and non‐participant observation.FindingsThe system as a technique of control and related discourses and ideals formed a coherent “rationalized package” which actors had actually internalized. Still, they collectively used the new system in a very ceremonial mode and the authors' analysis identified discrepancies between actors' explicit understanding and practical experience of the system.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors' research suggests that studies of accounting change should further explore the complex and sometimes paradoxical nature of subjectivities at work in the adoption of new systems. Studies should combine the analysis of actors' behaviours and representations and their development over time, even though the latter longitudinal perspective is missing in the present research.Practical implicationsExperience encompasses more than understanding and cognitive agreement. Deliberate acceptance of systems may co‐exist with non‐deliberate reluctant behaviour.Social implicationsAccounting transformation projects should reckon the role that actors' subjectivities can play in the institutionalization of new systems and practices.Originality/valueThe authors' research illustrates how subjectivity influences micro‐processes of accounting change. It highlights its experiential and non‐deliberate dimensions, thus complementing existing institutional research that has hitherto emphasized actors' deliberate actions and representations.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abernethy, M.A. and Chua, W.F. (1996), “A field study of control system ‘redesign’: the impact of institutional processes on strategic choice”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 569‐606.

Battilana, J. (2006), “Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals' social position”, Organization, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 653‐676.

Brignall, S. and Modell, S. (2000), “An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new’ public sector”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 281‐306.

Brunsson, N. (1989), The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations, Wiley, New York, NY.

Böhle, F. and Milkau, B. (1991), Von Handrat zum Bildschirm, CAMPUS, Institut für Sozialwissenschatliche Forschung e.v. ISF München (French translation in Ancelin C. et al. (1998), De la manivelle à l'écran. L'évolution de l'expérience sensible des ouvriers lors des changements technologiques, Eyrolles, Paris).

Caccia, L. and Steccolini, I. (2006), “Accounting change in Italian local governments: what's beyond managerial fashion?”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 17 Nos 2/3, pp. 154‐174.

Carruthers, B.G. (1995), “Accounting, ambiguity, and the new institutionalism”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 313‐328.

Chang, L. (2006), “Managerial responses to externally imposed performance measurement in the NHS: an institutional theory perspective”, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 63‐85.

Closing Address (2001), Closing Address of Inf‐Rail CEO, Inf‐Rail Convention, Internal Document, October.

Collier, P.M. (2001), “The power of accounting: a field study of local financial management in a police force”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 465‐486.

Covaleski, M.A. and Dirsmith, M.W. (1988), “An institutional perspective on the rise, social transformation, and fall of a university budget category”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 562‐587.

Covaleski, M.A., Dirsmith, M.W. and Michelman, J.E. (1993), “An institutional theory perspective on the DRG framework, case‐mix accounting systems and health‐care organizations”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 65‐80.

Damasio, A.R. (1999), The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion, and Consciousness, Harcourt Brace, New York, NY.

Dambrin, C., Lambert, C. and Sponem, S. (2007), “Control and change – analysing the process of institutionalisation”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 172‐208.

Dejours, C. (1999), Le facteur humain, 2nd ed., Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

Dejours, C. (2009), Travail vivant 1: Sexualité et travail, Payot, Paris.

Dent, J.F. (1991), “Accounting and organizational cultures: a field study of the emergence of a new organizational reality”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 8, pp. 705‐732.

Deranty, J.P. (2008), “Work and the precarisation of existence”, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 443‐463.

Deranty, J.P. (2009), “What is work? Key insights from the psychodynamics of work”, Thesis Eleven, Vol. 98, pp. 69‐87.

d'Iribarne, P. (1989), La logique de l'honneur, Seuil, Paris.

Freud, S. (1973), Psychopathologie de la vie quotidienne, Payot, Paris.

Friedland, R. and Alford, R.R. (1991), “Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions”, in Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 232‐266.

General Outline (2002), General Outline of the Project: Renovating Production Management, Inf‐Rail Finance Department, Internal Document, January 24.

Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E.R. and Lounsbury, M. (2011), “Institutional complexity and organizational responses”, The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 317‐371.

Handouts (2003), Handouts of the Documents of Presentation of the Project Used in Internal Training Sessions, Internal Document, March.

Hasselbladh, H. and Kallinikos, J. (2000), “The project of rationalization: a critique and reappraisal of Neo‐Institutionalism in organizations studies”, Organization Studies, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 697‐720.

Hood, C. (1995), “The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: variations on a theme”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 Nos 2/3, pp. 93‐109.

Hopper, T. and Major, M. (2007), “Extending institutional analysis through theoretical triangulation: regulation and activity‐based costing in Portuguese telecommunications”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 59‐97.

Johnsen, A. (1999), “Implementation mode and local government performance measurement: a Norwegian experience”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 4‐66.

Jupe, R. (2009), “A ‘fresh start’ or the ‘worst of all worlds’? A critical financial analysis of the performance and regulation of Network Rail in Britain's privatised raiway system”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 175‐204.

Kostova, T. and Roth, K. (2002), “Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 215‐233.

Lounsbury, M. (2008), “Institutional rationality and practice variation: new directions in the institutional analysis of practice”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 30 Nos 7/8, pp. 735‐764.

Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83 No. 2, pp. 340‐363.

Modell, S. (2001), “Performance measurement and institutional processes: a study of managerial responses to public sector reforms”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 437‐464.

Modell, S. (2004), “Performance measurement myths in the public sector: a research note”, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 39‐55.

Moll, J. and Hoque, Z. (2011), “Budgeting for legitimacy: the case of an Australian university”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 86‐101.

Oliver, C. (1991), “Strategic responses to institutional processes”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 145‐179.

Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004), Public Management Reforms: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Power, M. (2003), “Evaluating the audit explosion”, Law and Policy, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 185‐202.

Quattrone, P. and Hopper, T. (2001), “What does organizational change mean? Speculations on a taken for granted category”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 403‐435.

Reference Manual (n.d.), Reference Manual for Conducting Management Reviews, Inf‐Rail Internal Document.

Scott, W.R. (2008), “Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory”, Theory and Society, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 427‐442.

Solomon, R.C. (2002), “Emotions, cognition, affect: on Jerry Neu's A tear is an intellectual thing”, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 108 Nos 1/2, pp. 133‐142.

Suddaby, R. (2010), “Challenges for institutional theory”, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 14‐20.

ter Bogt, H.K. and Scapens, R.W. (2009), “Performance measurement in universities: a comparative study of two A&F groups in The Netherlands and the UK”, SSRN working paper Series, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1432749.

Thornton, P.H. and Ocasio, W. (1999), “Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958‐1990”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105 No. 3, pp. 801‐843.

Thornton, P.H. and Ocasio, W. (2008), “Institutional logics”, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Andersen, S.K. and Suddaby, R. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Sage, London.

Voronov, M. and Vince, R. (2012), “Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 58‐81.

Wilson, E. (1993), “Culture and the new managerialism”, in Wilson, J. and Hinton, P. (Eds), Public Services and the 1990s – Issues in Public Service Finance and Management, Tudor, London.

Winnicott, D.W. (1965), “Ego distortion in terms of true and false self”, The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development, International UP Inc., New York, NY, pp. 140‐152.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 9 Số 2

206-236

Thông tin tác giả