Subgroup deliberation and voting

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 45 - Trang 155-186 - 2015
Mark Thordal-Le Quement1, Venuga Yokeeswaran1
1University of Bonn Bonn, Germany

Tóm tắt

We consider three mechanisms for the aggregation of information in heterogeneous committees voting by Unanimity rule: Private Voting and voting preceded by either Plenary or Subgroup Deliberation. While the first deliberation protocol imposes public communication, the second restricts communication to homogeneous subgroups. We find that both protocols allow to Pareto improve on outcomes achieved under private voting. Furthermore, we find that when focusing on simple equilibria under Plenary Deliberation, Subgroup Deliberation Pareto improves on outcomes achieved under Plenary Deliberation.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Austen-Smith D, Feddersen TJ (2006) Deliberation, preference uncertainty and voting rules. Am Polit Sci Rev 100:209–217 Coughlan PJ (2000) In defense of unanimous jury verdicts : mistrials, communication and strategic voting. Am Polit Sci Rev 94:375–393 Deimen I, Ketelaar, F, Le Quement MT (unpublished) Consistency and communication in committees, University of Bonn, mimeo Doraszelski U, Gerardi D, Squintani F (2006) Communication and voting with doubled sided information, Contrib Theor Econom. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0256 Duggan J, Martinelli C (2001) A Bayesian model of voting in juries. Games Econ Behav 37:259–294 Feddersen TJ, Pesendorfer W (1998) Convicting the innocent: the inferiority of unanimous jury verdicts under strategic voting. Am Polit Sci Rev 92:23–35 Gerardi D (2000) Jury verdicts and preference diversity. Am Polit Sci Rev 94:395–406 Gerardi D, Yariv L (2007) Deliberative voting. J Econ Theor 134:317–338 Hummel P (2010) Deliberation in large juries with diverse preferences. Public Choice 150:595–608 Le Quement MT (2012) Communication compatible voting rules. Theor Decis 74:479–507 Meirowitz A (2002) Informative voting and Condorcet jury theorems with a continuum of types. Soc Choice Welfare 19:219–236 Meirowitz A (2007) In defense of exclusionary deliberation: communication and voting with private beliefs and values. J Theor Polit 19:301–327 Van Weelden R (2008) Deliberation rules and voting. Q J Polit Sci 3:83–88 Wolinsky A (2002) Eliciting information from multiple experts. Games Econ Behav 41:1419–1431