Study of a supersonic reacting wall jet with a variable turbulent Prandtl and Schmidt number approach

Georgiadis, 2014, Status of turbulence modeling for hypersonic propulsion flowpaths, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 28, 295, 10.1007/s00162-013-0316-z Urzay, 2018, Supersonic combustion in air-breathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flight, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 50, 593, 10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045217 Baurle, 2004 Xiao, 2007, Role of turbulent Prandtl numbers on heat flux at hypersonic Mach numbers, AIAA J., 45, 806, 10.2514/1.21447 Pecnik, 2012, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of the HyShot II scramjet, AIAA J., 50, 1717, 10.2514/1.J051473 Roy, 2017, Variable turbulent Prandtl number model for shock/boundary-layer interaction, AIAA J., 342 Roy, 2019, Turbulent heat flux model for hypersonic shock–boundary layer interaction, AIAA J., 1 Oefelein, 2006, Mixing and combustion of cryogenic oxygen-hydrogen shear-coaxial jet flames at supercritical pressure, Combust. Sci. Technol., 178, 229, 10.1080/00102200500325322 Baurle, 2002, Analysis of dual-mode hydrocarbon scramjet operation at Mach 4-6.5, J. Propuls. Power, 18, 990, 10.2514/2.6047 Sharma, 2020, Effect of location of a transverse sonic jet on shock augmented mixing in a scramjet engine, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 96, 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105535 Sharma, 2020, Determination of optimal spacing between transverse jets in a scramjet engine, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 96, 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105520 Reynolds, 1975, The prediction of turbulent Prandtl and Schmidt numbers, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 18, 1055, 10.1016/0017-9310(75)90223-9 Brinckman, 2005, Progress in practical scalar fluctuation modeling for high-speed aeropropulsive flows, 508 Brinckman, 2007, Scalar fluctuation modeling for high-speed aeropropulsive flows, AIAA J., 45, 1036, 10.2514/1.21075 Xiao, 2006, Variable turbulent Schmidt-number formulation for scramjet applications, AIAA J., 44, 593, 10.2514/1.15450 Xiao, 2007, Modeling scramjet flows with variable turbulent Prandtl and Schmidt numbers, AIAA J., 45, 1415, 10.2514/1.26382 Keistler, 2009, Simulation of supersonic combustion in three-dimensional configurations, J. Propuls. Power, 25, 1233, 10.2514/1.43848 Keistler, 2010, Simulation of supersonic combustion involving H2/air and C2H4/air, AIAA J., 48, 166, 10.2514/1.43213 Goldberg, 2010, Variable turbulent Schmidt and Prandtl number modeling, Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., 4, 511 Sinha, 2003, Modeling shock unsteadiness in shock/turbulence interaction, Phys. Fluids, 15, 2290, 10.1063/1.1588306 Gerlinger, 2001, An implicit multigrid method for turbulent combustion, J. Comput. Phys., 167, 247, 10.1006/jcph.2000.6671 Gerlinger, 2003, Investigation of an assumed PDF approach for finite-rate chemistry, Combust. Sci. Technol., 175, 841, 10.1080/00102200302410 Gerlinger, 2005 Burrows, 1973, An analytical and experimental study of supersonic combustion of hydrogen in vitiated air stream, AIAA J., 11, 1217, 10.2514/3.50564 Burrows, 1973 Hoste, 2018 Kenzakowski, 2000, Evaluation of advanced turbulence models and variable Prandtl/Schmidt number methodology for propulsive flows, 885 Girimaji, 1991, A simple recipe for modeling reaction-rate in flows with turbulent-combustion, 1792 Keistler, 2005 Karl, 2011 Gonzalez-Juez, 2017, Advances and challenges in modeling high-speed turbulent combustion in propulsion systems, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 60, 26, 10.1016/j.pecs.2016.12.003 Edwards, 2012, Large-eddy/Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulation of a supersonic reacting wall jet, Combust. Flame, 159, 1127, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.10.009 Peters, 2001 Evans, 1978 Evans, 1980, Influence of chemical kinetics and unmixedness on burning in supersonic hydrogen flames, AIAA J., 18, 188, 10.2514/3.50747 Ebrahimi, 1993 Parent, 2004, Validation of the Wilcox k-omega model for flows characteristic to hypersonic airbreathing propulsion, AIAA J., 42, 261, 10.2514/1.1989 Engblom, 2005, Progress in validation of Wind-US for ramjet/scramjet combustion Bhagwandin, 2009, Numerical simulation of a hydrogen-fueled dual-mode scramjet engine using Wind-US, 5382 Huang, 2012, Influences of H2O mass fraction and chemical kinetics mechanism on the turbulent diffusion combustion of H2–O2 in supersonic flows, Acta Astronaut., 76, 51, 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.02.017 Gao, 2015, Combustion heat-release effects on supersonic compressible turbulent boundary layers, AIAA J., 53, 1949, 10.2514/1.J053585 d'Angelo, 1994 Hsu, 1994, Probability density function approach for compressible turbulent reacting flows, AIAA J., 32, 1407, 10.2514/3.12209 Kroll, 2014, The DLR flow solver TAU-status and recent algorithmic developments, 0080 Liou, 2001 Kroll, 1987, Solution of two-dimensional Euler equations: experience with a finite volume code, STIN, 88 Menter, 2003, Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model, Heat Mass Transf., 4 Jachimowski, 1992 Hoste, 2019, Characterisation of the eddy dissipation model for the analysis of hydrogen-fuelled scramjets, Aeronaut. J., 123, 536, 10.1017/aer.2018.169 Keistler, 2009 Kim, 2003, Numerical study of mixing enhancement by shock waves in model scramjet engine, AIAA J., 41, 1074, 10.2514/2.2047 Landsberg, 2017, Improving scramjet performance through flow field manipulation, J. Propuls. Power, 1 Gollan, 2013, About the formulation, verification and validation of the hypersonic flow solver Eilmer, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 73, 19, 10.1002/fld.3790 Jacobs, 2016, Implementation of a compressible-flow simulation code in the D programming language, vol. 846, 54 Lee, 2006, Characteristics of dual transverse injection in scramjet combustor, part 1: mixing, J. Propuls. Power, 22, 1012, 10.2514/1.14180 Wilcox, 2008, Formulation of the k-ω turbulence model revisited, AIAA J., 46, 2823, 10.2514/1.36541