Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry

Assessing Writing - Tập 19 - Trang 80-96 - 2014
Weiqiang Wang1
1School of English for International Business, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 2 North Baiyun Avenue, Guangzhou 510420, People's Republic of China

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrade, 2000, Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning, Educational Leadership, 57, 13 Andrade, 2007, Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 159, 10.1080/02602930600801928 Badger, 2000, A process genre approach to teaching writing, ELT Journal, 54, 153, 10.1093/elt/54.2.153 Berg, 1999, The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5 Brown, 2005, Self-assessment of writing in independent language learning programs: The value of annotated samples, Assessing Writing, 10, 174, 10.1016/j.asw.2005.06.001 Bryant, 2010, Peer assessment in a test-dominated setting: Empowering, boring or facilitating examination preparation?, Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9, 3, 10.1007/s10671-009-9077-2 Carless, 2011 Carson, 1996, Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction, Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1, 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0 Caulk, 1994, Comparing teacher and student responses to written work, TESOL Quarterly, 28, 181, 10.2307/3587209 Cho, 2006, Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts, Written Communication, 23, 260, 10.1177/0741088306289261 Cho, 2010, Student revision with peer and expert reviewing, Learning and Instruction, 98, 891 Connor, 1994, Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?, Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 257, 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90019-1 Fei, 2006, Students perceptions of peer response activity in English writing instruction, Teaching English in China, 29, 48 Guerrero, 1994, Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision, The Modern Language Journal, 78, 484, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02065.x Hamp-Lyons, 1991, Scoring procedures for ESL contexts, 241 Hanrahan, 2001, Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views, Higher Education Research & Development, 20, 53, 10.1080/07294360123776 He, 2012, Topical knowledge and ESL writing, Language Testing, 29, 443, 10.1177/0265532212436659 Hu, 2005, Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers, Language Teaching Research, 9, 321, 10.1191/1362168805lr169oa Jacobs, 1998, Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path, Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 307, 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90019-4 Jacobs, 1981 Kondo-Brown, 2002, A FACETS analysis of rater bias in measuring Japanese second language writing performance, Language Testing, 19, 3, 10.1191/0265532202lt218oa Liu, 2002 Liu, 2003, The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 85, 550 Mangelsdorf, 1992, Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom, ELT Journal, 46, 274, 10.1093/elt/46.3.274 Mangelsdorf, 1992, ESL student response stances in a peer-review task, Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 235, 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90005-A Matsuno, 2009, Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms, Language Testing, 26, 75, 10.1177/0265532208097337 Mawlawi Diab, 2010, Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts, System, 38, 85, 10.1016/j.system.2009.12.008 Mawlawi Diab, 2011, Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing, Assessing Writing, 16, 274, 10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.001 McGroarty, 1997, Triangulation in classroom research: A study of peer revision, Language Learning, 47, 1, 10.1111/0023-8333.11997001 Mendonca, 1994, Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction, TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745, 10.2307/3587558 Merriam, 1998 Min, 2005, Training students to become successful peer reviewers, System, 33, 293, 10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003 Min, 2006, The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 Nelson, 1998, ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups, Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113, 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90010-8 Paulus, 1999, The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9 Pennington, 1996, Explaining Hong Kong students’ response to process writing: An exploration of causes and outcomes, Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 227, 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90003-X Rahimi, 2013, Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing, Language Teaching Research, 17, 67, 10.1177/1362168812459151 Rao, 2007, Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills, ELT Journal, 61, 100, 10.1093/elt/ccm002 Reddy, 2010, A review of rubric use in higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 435, 10.1080/02602930902862859 Rollinson, 2005, Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class, ELT Journal, 59, 23, 10.1093/elt/cci003 Saito, 2004, Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms, Language Teaching Research, 8, 31, 10.1191/1362168804lr133oa Sengupta, 1998, Peer evaluation: ‘I am not the teacher’, ELT Journal, 52, 19, 10.1093/elt/52.1.19 Shih-hsien, 2011, Exploring the effectiveness of using peer evaluation and teacher feedback in college students’ writing, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20, 144 Stanley, 1992, Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators, Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 217, 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90004-9 Suzuki, 2008, Japanese learners’ self revisions and peer revisions of their written compositions in English, TESOL Quarterly, 42, 209, 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00116.x Tedick, 1990, ESL writing assessment: Subject-matter knowledge and its impact on performance, English for Specific Purposes, 9, 123, 10.1016/0889-4906(90)90003-U Torrance, 2007, Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14, 281, 10.1080/09695940701591867 Tsui, 2000, Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?, Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147, 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9 Villamil, 1996, Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior, Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51, 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6 Vygotsky, 1978 Weigle, 2002 Yang, 2006, A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265 Zhang, 1995, Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209, 10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 Zhang, 1999, Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 321, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80119-2 Zhao, 2010, Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom, Assessing Writing, 15, 3, 10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002 Zhu, 1995, Effects of training for peer response on students’ comments and interaction, Written Communication, 12, 492, 10.1177/0741088395012004004 Zhu, 2001, Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups, Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 251, 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00043-1