Students’ multiple intelligences in video-assisted learning environments
Tóm tắt
Many educators who advocate the use of multiple intelligences theory are claiming its efficiency in teaching practice across various education settings and modes. Despite its claimed potential to enhance teaching and learning through increased attention to students’ learning styles and preferences, the use of this theory seems to be largely ignored in higher education settings. In providing an optimal learning environment for learners, educators need to understand students’ prior experiences and current perceptions, in order to make best use of digital technology affordances to improve student learning. This mixed-methods research focuses on the differences in students’ MI according to age and gender and students’ perceptions of the value of online videos and reports whether employing various types of videos within a learning module could increase and support learning needs and intelligences of students. The quantitative findings of the study revealed that students are higher on Intrapersonal intelligence and lower in Existential intelligence. Bodily-Kinesthetic and Verbal-Linguistic intelligences were also found as other highly developed intelligences of students. In addition, significant differences between the MI profiles of the students and their age and gender categories were found. The qualitative phase of the study revealed that videos could address students’ various intelligence types and abilities. Students also reported that video integration could improve their learning abilities and experience.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Al-Balhan, E. M. (2006). Multiple intelligence styles in relation to improved academic performance in Kuwaiti middle school reading. Digest of Middle East Studies, 15(1), 18–34.
Allen, P., & Bennett, K. (2010). PASW statistics by SPSS: A practical guide version 18.0. Australia: Cengage Learning.
Al-Salameh, E. M. (2012). Multiple intelligences of the high primary stage students. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(1), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v4n1p196.
Amer, A., Barwani, T. A., & Ibrahim, M. (2010). Student teachers’ perceived use of online reading strategies. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 6(4), 102–113.
Angiello, R. (2010). Study looks at online learning vs. traditional instruction. The Education Digest, 76(2), 56–59.
Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Barrington, E. (2004). Teaching to student diversity in higher education: How multiple intelligence theory can help. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(4), 421–434.
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning. A systematic and critical review (R. o. t. L. S. a (Research ed.). UK: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles. Educause, 1, 7–12.
Diaz-Lefebvre, R. (2004). Multiple intelligences, learning for understanding, and creative assessment: Some pieces to the puzzle of learning. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 49–57.
Eickelmann, B., & Vennemann, M. (2017). Teachers‘attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 733–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117725899.
Felix, U. (2005). E-learning pedagogy in the third millennium: The need for combining social and cognitive constructivist approaches. ReCALL, 17(1), 85–100.
Foong, L. M., Shariffudin, R. S., & Mislan, N. (2012). Pattern and relationship between multiple intelligences, personality traits and critical thinking skills among high achievers in Malaysia. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, Singapore.
Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. The Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 200–209.
Gardner, H. (1999a). Are there additional intelligences? The case of naturalist, spiritual and existential intelligences. In J. Kane (Ed.), Education, information and transformation (pp. 111–131). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gardner, H. (1999b). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2006). The development and education of the mind: The selected works of Howard Gardner. NY, USA: Routledge.
Gardner, H. (2011a). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2011b). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
Giannakos, M. N., Chorianopoulos, K., & Chrisochoides, N. (2015). Making sense of video analytics: Lessons learned from clickstream interactions, attitudes, and learning outcome in a video-assisted course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(1), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1976.
Hajhashemi, K., Akef, K., & Anderson, N. (2012). The relationship between multiple intelligences and reading proficiency of Iranian EFL students. World Applied Science Journal (WASJ), 19(10), 1475–1483. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.19.10.3134.
Hajhashemi, K., Caltabiano, N., & Anderson, N. (2017). Net-Geners’ perceptions of engagement through online videos. Computers in Education (Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0084-7
Hajhashemi, K., & Wong, B. E. (2010). A validation study of the Persian version of Mckenzie’s (1999) multiple intelligences inventory to measure MI profiles of Pre-University students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (JSSH), 18(2), 343–355.
Keskin, G., & Yildirim, G. O. (2008). The evaluation of university students in terms of problem solving, autonomy, multiple intelligences based on Constructive approach Norms. Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(16), 67–78.
Kutz, M., Dyer, S., & Campbell, B. (2013). Multiple intelligence profiles of athletic training students. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 11(1), 1–9.
Lance, J., & Kitchin, P. (2007). Promoting the individual learning styles of masters students studying marketing-related modules through the use of YouTube video-clips. Investigations in university teaching and learning, 4(2), 111–125.
Lawrence, A. A. (2014). Multiple intelligence of prospective teachers. International Educational E-Journal, III(II), 112–118.
Lopez, S., & Patron, H. (2012). Multiple intelligences in online, hybrid, and traditional Business Statistics courses. Journal of Educators Online, 9(2), 167–182.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McCoog, I. J. (2007). Integrated instruction: Multiple intelligences and technology. The Clearing House, 81(1), 25–28.
McKethan, R., Rabinowitz, E., & Kemodle, M. W. (2010). Multiple intelligences in virtual and traditional skill instructional learning environments. The Physical Educator, 67(3), 156–168.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, D.C: US Department of Education.
Meneviş, İ., & Özad, B. E. (2014). Do age and gender influence multiple intelligences? Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(Supplement 1 to Issue 1), 9S-19S.
Mundy, M.-A., Kupczynski, L., & Kee, R. (2012). Teacher’s perceptions of technology use in the schools. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012440813
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Panahandeh, E., Khoshkhoonejad, A., Mansourzadeh, N., & Heidari, F. (2015). On the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ multiple intelligences and their learning styles. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(4), 784–791.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Peterson, C. C. (2014). Looking forward through the lifespan: Developmental psychology (6th ed.). NSW, Australia: Pearson.
Razmjoo, S. A. (2008). On the relationship between multiple intelligences and language proficiency. the Reading. Matrix, 8(2), 155–174.
Razmjoo, S. A., Sahragard, R., & Sadri, M. (2009). On the relationship between multiple intelligences, vocabulary learning knowledge and vocabulary learning strategies among the Iranian EFL learners. The Iranian EFL Journal Quarterly, 3, 82–110.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Saricaoglu, A., & Arikan, A. (2009). A study of multiple intelligence, foreign language success and some selected variables. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 5(2), 110–122.
Sherer, P., & Shea, T. (2011). Using online video to support student learning and engagement. College Teaching, 59(2), 56–59.
Spillane, R. R. (2008). Teaching for intelligence: The intellectual life of schools. In B. Z. Presseisen (Ed.), Teaching for intelligence (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistic (6th ed.). NY: Pearson International Edition.
Tyler, C. E., & Loventhal, G. (2011). Can multiple intelligences enhance learning for higher education on-line instruction? Paper presented at the e-Leader 2011, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. http://www.g-casa.com/conferences/vietnam/paper/Tyler.pdf
Verhoeven, J. C., Heerwegh, D., & De Wit, K. (2016). ICT learning experience and research orientation as predictors of ICT skills and the ICT use of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 21(1), 71–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9310-3.