Student suspension: A critical reappraisal
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Edelman, M. W., Beck, R., and Smith, P.V.School Suspensions: Are They Helping Children? Cambridge, Mass.: Children's Defense Fund, 1975.
Garibaldi, A. M. (Ed.).In-School Alternatives to Suspension: Conference Report. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1979.
Kelly, D. H., & Pink, W. R. School commitment, youth rebellion and delinquency,Criminology. 1973,10 (4), 473–485.
Lines, P. M. The case against short suspensions. InDiscipline and Learning: An Inquiry into Student-Teacher Relationship (Rev. ed.). Washington, D. C.: National Education Association, 1977.
Mizell, M. H. Designing and implementing in-school alternatives to suspension.The Urban Review, 1978,10 (3), 213–226.
National Institute of Education.Violent Schools-Safe Schools. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1978.
Neill, S. B.Suspension and Expulsion: Current Trends in School Policies and Programs. Arlington, Va.: National School Public Relations Association, 1976.
Pink, W. T. Rebellion and success in the high school.Contemporary Education, 1978, LXIX (2), 78–84.
Polk, K., & Schafer, W.Schools and Delinquency. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
Rubel, R. J.The Unruly School: Disorder, Disruptions, and Crimes. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1977.
Schafer, W. E., & Olexa, C.Tracking and Opportunity. Scranton, Pa.: Chandler Publishing Co., 1971.
Stinchcombe, A. L.Rebellion in a High School. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1964.
United States Senate Subcommittee to investigate Juvenile Delinquency.School Violence and Vandalism: Models and Strategies for Change. Hearing Before the Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquency of Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, 94th Congress. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1976.
Williams, J. In-school alternatives to suspension: Why bother? In: A. M. Garibaldi (Ed.),In-School Alternatives to Suspension: Conference Report. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1979.