Student satisfactions in four mixed courses in elementary teacher education program

Internet and Higher Education - Tập 11 - Trang 53-59 - 2008
Qiuyun Lin1
1Department of Childhood Education, SUNY Plattsburgh, 101 Broad Street, Plattsburgh, NY 12901, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

American Council on Education. (2005). To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught. Retrieved May 18, 2007, from http://www.acenet.edu/resources/presnet/teacher-ed-rpt.pdf Amrein-Beardsley, 2007, Examining the development of a hybrid degree program: Using student and instructor data to inform decision-making, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 331, 10.1080/15391523.2007.10782486 Andrews, 2002, Preparing general education preservice teachers for inclusion: Web-enhanced case-based instruction, Journal of Special Education Technology, 17, 27, 10.1177/016264340201700302 Ausburn, 2004, Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: An American perspective, Educational Media International, 41, 327, 10.1080/0952398042000314820 Beyth-Marom, 2005, Synchronous vs. asynchronous tutorials: Factors affecting students' preferences and choices, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37, 245, 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782436 Bonk, 2002, Learning from focus groups: An examination of blended learning, Journal of Distance Education, 17, 97 Clark, 2007 Coates, 2004, “No significant distance” between face-to-face and online instruction: Evidence from principles of economics, Economics of Education Review, 23, 533, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.02.002 Davies, 2005, Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades, British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 657, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00542.x Doering, 2003, Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology?, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 35, 342 Donnelly, 2006, Blended problem-based learning for teacher education: Lessons learnt, Learning, Media, & Technology, 31, 93, 10.1080/17439880600756621 Fjermestad, 2005, Effectiveness for students: Comparisons of “in-seat” and ALN courses, 39 Fortune, 2006, A comparison of online (high tech) and traditional (high touch) learning in business communication courses in silicon valley, Journal of Education for Business, 81, 210, 10.3200/JOEB.81.4.210-214 Frazee, 2003, Using relevance to facilitate online participation in a hybrid course, Educause Quarterly, 26, 67 Goldberg, 2003, The effect of computers on student writing: A metaanalysis of studies from 1992 to 2002, Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2 Ho, 2005, The evolution of a hybrid classroom: Introducing online learning to educators in American Samoa, TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 49, 24, 10.1007/BF02784901 Irons, 2002, Blended learning and learner satisfaction: Keys to user acceptance?, USDLA Journal, 16 Mansour, 2007, Students' positive and negative experiences in hybrid and online classes, College Student Journal, 41, 242 Neuhauser, 2002, Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction, American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 99, 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_4 O'Toole, 2003, The impact of blended learning on student outcomes: Is there room on the horse for two?, Journal of Educational Media, 28, 179, 10.1080/1358165032000165680 Olapiriyakul, 2006, A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study, Internet & Higher Education, 9, 287, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.001 Overbaugh, 2006, Student characteristics, sense of community, and cognitive achievement in web-based and lab-based learning environments, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 205, 10.1080/15391523.2006.10782480 Parkinson, 2003, Emerging themes of student satisfaction in a traditional course and a blended distance course, Tech Trends, 47, 22, 10.1007/BF02763508 Peterson, 2004, Online compared to face-to-face teacher preparation for learning standards-based planning skills, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 345, 10.1080/15391523.2004.10782419 Riffell, 2005, Using web-based instruction to improve large undergraduate biology courses: An evaluation of hybrid course format, Computers & Education, 44, 217, 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.01.005 Skylar, 2005, Distance education: An exploration of alternative methods and types of instructional media in teacher education, Journal of Special Education Technology, 30, 25, 10.1177/016264340502000303 Smith, 2005, The positive and challenging aspects of learning online and in traditional face-to-face classrooms: A student perspective, Journal of Special Education Technology, 20, 52, 10.1177/016264340502000207 Stoyanova, 2002, Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving, J. of Interactive Learning Research, 13, 111 Summers, 2005, A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class, Innovative Higher Education, 29, 233, 10.1007/s10755-005-1938-x Swenson, 2003, Hybrid courses as learning communities, 27 Thirunarayanan, 2001, Comparing web-based and classroom-based learning: A quantitative study, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 10.1080/15391523.2001.10782340 Twigg, 2003, Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning, Educause Review, 38, 28 Vaughan, 2007, Perspectives on blended learning in higher education, International Journal on E-Learning, 6, 81 Woods, 2004, Hybrid structures: Faculty use and perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face instruction, Internet & Higher Education, 7, 281, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.09.002 Young, 2006, Student views of effective online teaching in higher education, American Journal of Distance Education, 20, 65, 10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2