Student involvement in learning: Collaboration in science for PreService elementary teachers
Tóm tắt
The present study provided insights regarding the interactions that take place in collaborative science laboratory and regarding the outcome of such interactions. Science laboratory experiences structured by teachers have been criticized for allowing very little, if any, meaningful learning. However, this study showed that even structured laboratory experiments can provide insightful experience for students when conducted in a group setting that demanded interactive participation from all its members. The findings of the present study underscored the synergistic and supportive nature of collaborative groups. Here, students patiently repeated explanations to support the meaning construction on the part of their slower peers and elaborated their own understanding in the process; groups negotiated the meaning of observations and the corresponding theoretical explanations; students developed and practiced a range of social skills necessary in today’s workplace; and off-task behavior was thwarted by the group members motivated to work toward understanding rather than simply generating answers for task completion. The current findings suggest an increased use of collaborative learning environments for the teaching of science to elementary education majors. Some teachers have already made use of such settings in their laboratory teaching. However, collaborative learning should not be limited to the laboratory only, but be extended to more traditionally structured classes. The effects of such a switch in activity structures, increased quality of peer interaction, mastery of subject matter content, and decreased anxiety levels could well lead to better attitudes toward science among preservice elementary school teachers and eventually among their own students.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Brown, A. L. (1988). Motivation to learn and understand: On taking charge of one’s own learning.Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 311–321.
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989) Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick,Knowing, leaning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind”.College English, 34, 635–652.
Clegg, C. S. (1990). Critical discourse: Collaborative learning in literary studies.Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1, 77–87.
Cooper, J., & Mueck, R. (1990). Student involvement in learning: Cooperative learning and college instruction.Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1, 68–76.
De Beaugrande, R. (1984). Writer, reader, critic: Comparing critical theories as discourse.College English, 46, 533–538.
Duschl, R. A. (1983). The elementary level science methods course: breeding ground for an apprehension toward science? A case study.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 745–754.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook for research on teaching (3rd ed.), (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
Forman, E. A., & Cazden, C. B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.)Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gallagher, J. J., & Tobin, K. (1987). Teacher management and student engagement in high school science.Science Education, 71, 535–555.
Geertz, C. (1973).The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1987). A theory of motivation for comprehension and its application to mathematics instruction. In T. A. Romberg & D. M. Steward (Eds.),The monitoring of school mathematics: Background papers. Vol. 2. Implications from psychology, outcomes of instruction. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.),Cooperative learning. Theory and Research. New York: Praeger
Kerr, N., & Bruun, S. (1983). Dispensibility of member effort and group motivation losses: Free rider effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.
Lemke, J. L. (1990).Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Schmuck, R. A., & Schmuck, P. A. (1983).Group processes in the classroom. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
Slavin, R. E. (1983).Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
Tilgner, P. J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school.Science Education, 74, 421–431.
Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning.School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403–418.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.