Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Đánh giá sinh viên về giảng dạy, động lực xã hội và lựa chọn của giáo viên: Một mô hình tiến hóa
Tóm tắt
Vấn đề đánh giá sinh viên về giảng dạy đã được nghiên cứu bởi một khối lượng lớn tài liệu trong nhiều thập kỷ. Tuy nhiên, vai trò của các yếu tố ảnh hưởng xã hội trong việc xác định phản ứng của giáo viên đối với các khung khuyến khích và đánh giá nhất định vẫn chưa được khám phá nhiều. Bài báo này thực hiện một nỗ lực đầu tiên theo chiều hướng này bằng cách xem xét một bối cảnh lý thuyết trò chơi tiến hóa, trong đó giáo viên phải đối mặt với một quy trình hai giai đoạn mà ở đó đánh giá của họ phụ thuộc vào cả đánh giá của sinh viên đối với khóa học của họ và đánh giá hồi tưởng của sinh viên về sản phẩm giảng dạy của họ dựa trên hiệu suất của sinh viên trong một khóa học tiếp theo liên quan. Chúng tôi phát hiện rằng cả kết quả nỗ lực cao (khóa học khó) và nỗ lực thấp (khóa học dễ) đều có thể xuất hiện, dẫn đến một kết quả tối ưu trong xã hội cho giáo viên hoặc không, tùy thuộc vào từng trường hợp. Hơn nữa, có thể có một xung đột tiềm ẩn giữa kết quả tối ưu cho sinh viên và cho giáo viên. Chúng tôi cũng xem xét các cách có thể để tổng quát hóa mô hình của chúng tôi trong các nghiên cứu trong tương lai.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Argentin G, Triventi M (2015) The North-South divide in school grading standards: New evidence from the national assessments of the Italian student population. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education 7:157–185
Basow SA, Codos S, Martin JL (2013) The effects of professors’ race and gender on student evaluation and performance. Coll Stud J 47:352–363
Basow SA, Silberg NT (1987) Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology 79:308–314
Bavishi A, Madera JM, Hebl MR (2010) The effect of professor ethnicity and gender on student evaluations: Judged before met. J Divers High Educ 3:245–256
Becker WE, Watts M (1999) How departments of economics evaluate teaching. Am Econ Rev 89:344–349
Boring A (2017) Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. J Public Econ 145:27–41
Bosshardt W, Watts M (2001) Comparing student and instructor evaluations of teaching. J Econ Educ 32:3–17
Boswell SS (2016) Ratemyprofessors is hogwash (but I care): Effects of Ratemyprofessors and university-administered teaching evaluations on professors. Comput Hum Behav 56:155–162
Braga M, Paccagnella M, Pellizzari M (2014) Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors. Econ Educ Rev 41:71–88
Brodie DA (1998) Do students report that easy professors are excellent teachers? Canadian Journal of Higher Education 28:1–20
Brown BW, Saks DH (1987) The microeconomics of the allocation of teachers’ time and student learning. Econ Educ Rev 6:319–332
Cahuc P, Carcillo P, Zylberberg A (2014) Labor economics. MIT Press, Cambridge
Carrell SE, West JE (2010) Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors. J Polit Econ 118:409–432
Catsiapis G (1987) A model of educational investment decisions. Rev Econ Stat 69:33–41
Chauvet L, Collier P, Fuster A (2015) Supervision and project performance: A principal-agent approach. UMR-DIAL Document de Travail DT/2015-04, Université Paris-Dauphine
Cho D, Baek W, Cho J (2015) Why do good performing students highly rate their instructors? Evidence from a natural experiment. Econ Educ Rev 49:172–179
Clayson DE (2009) Student evaluation of teaching: Are they related to what students learn? A meta-analysis and review of the literature. J Mark Educ 31:16–30
Correa H, Gruver GW (1987) Teacher-student interaction: A game theoretic extension of the economic theory of education. Math Soc Sci 13:19–47
Correa H (2001) A game theoretic analysis of faculty competition and academic standards. Higher Education Policy 14:175–182
Correa H (2003) A game theoretical analysis of educational impact of differences in the abilities and work ethics of teachers and students. Journal of Socio-Economics 32:249–263
Crumbley L, Henry BK, Kratchman SH (2001) Students’ perceptions of the evaluation of college teaching. Qual Assur Educ 9(4):197–207
Darwin S (2017) What contemporary work are student ratings actually doing in higher education? Studies in Educational Evaluation 54:13–21
Dommeyer CJ, Baum P, Hanna RW, Chapman KS (2004) Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online surveys: Their effects on response rates and evaluations. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29(5):611–623
Emery C, Kramer T, Tian R (2003) Return to academic standards: A critique of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Qual Assur Educ 11 (1):37–46
Entwistle NJ, Thompson J, Wilson JD (1974) Motivation and study habits. High Educ 3:379–396
Entwistle N, Hanley M, Hounsell D (1979) Identifying distinctive approaches to studying. High Educ 8:365–380
Ewing AM (2012) Estimating the impact of relative expected grade on student evaluation of teachers. Econ Educ Rev 31:141–154
Fenton J, Koper PT, Mitchell J, Stinson M (2008) Attractiveness, easiness and other issues: Student evaluations of professors on Ratemyprofessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33:45–61
Fah BCY, Osman S (2011) A case study of student evaluation of teaching in university. International Education Studies 4(1):44–50
Figlio DN, Kenny NW (2007) Individual teacher incentives and student performance. J Public Econ 91:901–914
Gaertner H (2014) Effects of student feedback as a method of self-evaluating the quality of teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation 42:91–99
Georgakopoulos A, Guerrero LK (2010) Student perceptions of teachers’ nonverbal and verbal communication: A comparison of best and worst professors across six cultures. International Education Studies 3:3–16
Goos M, Salomons A (2017) Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations. Res High Educ 58:341–364
Gotlieb J (2013) Variables that can affect student ratings of their professors. Journal of Learning in Higher Education 9:19–27
Greenwood GE, Ramagli H.J. Jr (1980) Alternatives to student ratings of college teaching. The Journal of Higher Education 51:673–684
Griffin BW (2016) Perceived autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and student ratings of instruction. Studies in Educational Evaluation 51:116–125
Gross J, Lakey B, Lucas JL, LaCross R, Plotkowski AR, Winegard B (2015) Forecasting the student-professor matches that result in unusually effective teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology 85:19–32
Hamburger H (1979) Games as models of social phenomena. W.H. Freeman, New York
Hargreaves L (2009) The status and prestige of teachers and teaching. In: Saha L.J., Dworkin A.G., Hargreaves L (eds) International handbook of research on teachers and teaching. Springer Science, New York, pp 217–229
Hartman KB, Hunt JB (2013) What ratemyprofessors.com reveals about how and why students evaluate their professors: A glimpse into the student mind-set. Mark Educ Rev 23:151–161
Hernández-Julián R, Looney A (2016) Measuring inflation in grades: An application of price indexing to undergraduate grades. Econ Educ Rev 55:220–232
Hofman E (2014) An obligation of conscience: Gossip as social control in an Eighteen-century Flemish town. Eur Rev Hist 21:653–670
Johnson VE (2003) Grade inflation. A crisis in college education. Springer, New York
Jones MD (2013) Teacher behavior under performance pay incentives. Econ Educ Rev 37:148–164
Kherfi S (2011) Whose opinion is it anyway? Determinants of participation in student evaluation of teaching. J Econ Educ 42:19–30
Kitts JA (2006) Collective action, rival incentives, and the emergence of antisocial norms. Am Sociol Rev 71:235–259
Knol M.H., in’t Veld R, Vorst HCM, van Driel JH, Mellenbergh GJ (2013) Experimental effects of student evaluations coupled with collaborative consultation on college professors’ instructional skills. Research in Higher Education 54:825–850
Kowai-Bell N, Guadagno RE, Little T, Preiss N, Hensley R (2011) Rate my expectations: How online evaluations of professors impact students’ perceived control. Comput Hum Behav 27:1862–1867
Kowai-Bell N, Guadagno RE, Little TE, Ballew JL (2012) Professors are people too: The impact of informal evaluations of professors on students and professors. Soc Psychol Educ 15:337–351
Krautmann AC, Sander W (1999) Grades and students’ evaluation of teachers. Econ Educ Rev 18:59–63
Kroman N (1978) Student evaluation of professors: Critique and proposal. Journal of Educational Thought 12:205–210
Langbein L (2008) Management by results: Students evaluation of faculty teaching and the mis-measurement of performance. Econ Educ Rev 27:417–428
Levin HM (1989) Economics of investment in educationally disadvantaged students. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 79:52–56
Li C, Wang X (2013) The power of eWOM: A re-examination of online student evaluations of their professors. Comput Hum Behav 29:1350–1357
Linse AR (2017) Interpreting and using student ratings data: Guidance for faculty serving as administrators and on evaluation committees. Studies in educational Evaluation 54:94–106
Mangan MA, Fleck B (2011) Online student evaluation of teaching: Will professor ‘hot and easy’ win the day? Journal of Excellence in College Teaching 22:59–84
Marchi E, Miguel O (1974) On the structure of the teaching-learning interactive process. International Journal of Game Theory 3:83–99
Matos-Diaz H (2012) Student evaluation of teaching, formulation of grade expectations, and instructor choice: Explorations with random-effects ordered probability models. East Econ J 38:296–309
McCready DJ (1981) Student evaluation of teaching. Can J High Educ 11:67–77
McKenzie RB (1979) The political economy of the educational process. Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston
Mitusch K (2006) Non-commitment in performance evaluation and the problem of information distortions. J Econ Behav Organ 60:507–525
Nasser-Abu Alhija F (2017) Teaching in higher education: Good teaching through students’ lens. Studies in Educational Evaluation 54:4–12
Oleinik A (2009) Does education corrupt? Theories of grade inflation. Educational Research Review 4:156–164
Orrù M, Biggart NW, Hamilton GG (1998) The economic organization of East Asian capitalism. Sage, London
Page CF (1974) Student evaluation of teaching: The American experience. Society for Research into Higher Education, London
Pan D, Tan GSH, Ragupathi K, Booluck K, Roop R, Ip YK (2009) Profiling teacher/teaching using descriptors derived from qualitative feedback: Formative and summative applications. Res High Educ 50:73–100
Pounder JS (2007) Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analytical framework for answering the question. Quality Assurance in Education 15:178–191
Reimann M (2016) The moderating role of overcommitment in the relationship between psychological contract breach and employee mental health. J Occup Health 58:425–433
Riniolo TC, Johnson KC, Sherman TR, Misso JA (2006) Hot or not: Do professors perceived as physically attractive receive higher student evaluations? Journal of General Psychology 133:19–35
Roberts RC (2016) Are some of the things faculty do to maximize their student evaluations of teachers scores unethical? Journal of Academic Ethics 14:133–148
Rotem A, Glasman NS (1979) On the effectiveness of students’ evaluative feedback to university instructors. Rev Educ Res 49:497–511
Rynes SL, Gerhard B, Parks L (2005) Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annu Rev Psychol 56:571–600
Sahlberg P (2012) A model lesson: Finland shows us what equal opportunity looks like. American Educator 36:20–27
Sahlberg P (2015) Finnish lessons 2.0. What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press, New York
Setari AP, Lee J, Bradley KD (2016) A psychometric approach to the validation of a student evaluation of teaching instrument. Studies in Educational Evaluation 51:77–87
Sheer VC, Fung TK (2007) Can email communication enhance professor-student relationship and student evaluation of professor? Some empirical evidence. J Educ Comput Res 37:289–306
Spooren P, Christiaens W (2017) I liked your course because I believed in (the power of) students evaluations of teaching (SET). Students’ perceptions of a teaching evaluation process and their relationships with SET scores. Studies in Educational Evaluation 54:43–49
Stark PB, Freishtat RL (2014) An evaluation of course evaluations. Science open research. https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.-.AOFRQA.v1.
Sun Y (1998) The academic success of East-Asian-American students: An investment model. Soc Sci Res 27:432–456
Toom A, Husu J (2012) Finnish teachers as ‘makers of the many’. Balancing between broad pedagogical freedom and responsibility. In: Niemi H, Toom A, Kallioniemi A (eds) Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp 41-56). Sense Publishers, Rotterdam
Uttl B, White CA, Wong Gonzalez D (2017) Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation 54:22–42
Wagner N, Rieger M, Voorvelt K (2016) Gender, ethnicity and teacher evaluations: evidence from mixed teaching teams. Econ Educ Rev 54:79–94
Walder AM (2017) Pedagogical innovation in Canadian higher education: Professors’ perspectives on its effects on teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation 54:71–82
Weibull J (1995) Evolutionary game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge
Wilson R (1998) New research casts doubt on value of student evaluation of professors. Chronicle of Higher Education 44(19):A12–A14
Zelby LW (1974) Student-faculty evaluation. Science 183:1267–1270
Zhao J, Gallant DJ (2012) Student evaluation of instruction in higher education: Exploring issues of validity and reliability. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37:227–235
