Structure of multi-species ant assemblages (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the Mountain Crimea
Tóm tắt
The multi-species ant assemblages were studied in the Crimea Mountains, in 9 types of plant associations in the plateau pastures as well as on the southern and northern slopes of the Main Range. A list of 18 ant species with data on their distribution in biotopes and also layers and the structure of their foraging territories is given. The hierarchical organization of multi-species ant assemblages and different strategies of nest location of the influents depending on the dominant species and its territoriality were investigated. Territoriality of each dominant species was determined by the frequency of foraging areas without nests of other species. Depending on dominant territoriality and the number of dominant species, the following classification of multi-species assemblages is proposed. (1) Monodominant assemblages with weakly expressed territoriality of the dominant species. Low density of the workers of Camponotus aethiops in the foraging territory determines weak interactions with influent species. The settling pattern of the influents shows no evident dependence on the dominant. Weakly expressed territoriality of the dominant allows non-territorial species to exist on the dominant’s territory. Such species were not found in other types of ant assemblages. (2) Monodominant assemblages with strongly expressed territoriality of the dominant species. The settling pattern of the influents shows the subordinate species to avoid those of higher ranks in the hierarchy, thus decreasing the probability of conflicts. The influents settle in the neutral zones as well as in the foraging territory of the dominant, so as to reduce competition with the subdominant species Formica cunicularia. Such a strategy reduces the probability of interspecific conflicts in biotopes with fewer vegetation layers than in the forests. (3) Bidominant assemblages with a variable dendrobiont dominant are typical among forest assemblages. Coexistence of two dominant species is possible when foraging of one of them is completely or partly restricted to one vegetation layer. The subdominant species avoid settling in the foraging territory of the dominant that occupies the same layer. When the dendrobiont dominant Crematogaster schmidti drops out of the assemblage, it (and its role in the assemblage) is replaced by other dendrobiont species Lasius emarginatus which otherwise acts as the 1st order subdominant in C. schmidti assemblages. (4) Polydominant assemblages are characterized by the presence of as many as 3 dominant species, namely Crematogaster schmidti, Camponotus aethiops, and Plagiolepis tauricus. The coexistence of the dominants is possible due to use of different layers (one species is a dendrobiont, the other two are herpeto-hortobionts), different activity periods (round-the-clock in Crematogaster schmidti, night in Camponotus aethiops, and daytime in P. tauricus), and different size classes of the workers (3rd, 5th, and 1st, respectively). The different size classes of workers reduce competition for food. Thus, when the number of dominant species in the assemblage increases, so does the number of mechanisms facilitating their coexistence.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andersen, A.N., “A Classification of Australian Ant Communities, Based on Functional Groups Which Parallel Plant Life-Forms in Relation to Stress and Disturbance,” J. Biogeogr. 22(1), 15–29 (1995).
Chernov, Yu.I., “A Brief Review of the Fauna of the Tundra Zone in the USSR,” in Zonal Specificity of Ter restrial Ecosystems, Ed. by Yu.A. Isakov (Nauka, Moscow, 1966), pp. 52–91 [in Russian].
Czechowski, W., Radchenko, A., and Czechowska, W., The Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Poland (Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, 2002).
Demchenko, A.V., Multispecies Association of Ant Nersts and Its Significance for Forest Protection. Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Krasnoyarsk, 1980).
Didukh, Ya.P., Vegetation of the Mountain Crimea (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1992) [in Russian].
Dlussky, G.M., “Methods of Qualitative Survey of Soil-Dwelling Ants,” Zool. Zh. 44(5), 716–727 (1965a).
Dlussky, G.M., “The Protected Territory in Ants,” Zh. Obshch. Biol. 26(4), 479–488 (1965b).
Dlussky, G.M., The Desert Ants (Nauka, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].
Dlussky, G.M., Soyunov, O.S., and Zabelin, S.I., Ants of Turkmenistan (Ylym, Ashkhabad, 1989) [in Russian].
Dunn, R.R., Sanders, N.J., Fitzpatrick, M.C., et al., “Global Ant Biodiversity and Biogeography-a New Database and Its Possibilities,” Myrmecol. News 10, 77–83 (2007).
Ivanov, S.P. and Stukalyuk, S.V., “Species Composition and Structure of Ant Communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Crimean Mountain Pastures,” Izv. Kharkov. Entomol. Obshch. 10(1–2), 135–141 (2002).
Ivanov, S.P. and Stukalyuk, S.V., “A New Method for Studying the Species Composition, Spatial Structure, and Hierarchical Relations in Communities of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),” in F.E. Falzfein Memorial Lectures: Collected Papers, Issue 36 (Kherson, 2003), pp. 119–123 [in Ukrainian].
Likhovidov, V.E. and Malii, E.N., “Biotopic Distribution of Ants in the Lower Third of the Main Crimean Mountain Range,” in The Mountain Crimea Ecosystems, Their Protection and Optimal Management (Simferopol, 1985), pp. 115–121 [in Russian].
Malii, E.N., “Ant Fauna of the Northern Macroslope of the Crimean Mountain Range,” in Protection and Rational Use of Natural Resources, Issue 1 (Simferopol, 1980), pp. 81–86 [in Russian].
Malii, E.N., Fauna and Ecology of Ants in the Crimea. Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Kiev, 1984).
Malii, E.N., “The Wood Ant in the Crimean Forests,” in The Biological Basis of Using Beneficial Insects (Moscow, 1988), pp. 57–58 [in Russian].
Malii, E.N. and Kobechinskaya, V.G., “Ants as an Important Asset of Forest Protection in the Crimea,” in Ants and Forest Protection. Proc. IX All-Russia Symp. (Moscow, 1991), pp. 14–16.
Menzel, F., Linsenmair, K.E., and Bluthgen, N., “Selective Interspecific Tolerance in Tropical Crematogaster-Camponotus Associations,” Animal Behav. 75(3), 837–846 (2008).
Pisarski, B. and Vepsalainen, K., “Competition Hierarchies in Ant Communities (Hymenoptera, Formicidae),” Ann. Zool. 42, 321–329 (1989).
Radchenko, A.G., Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of the Northern Black Sea Region. Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Kiev, 1985).
Radchenko, A.G., “Ants of the Genus Tetramorium (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the Fauna of the USSR. Communication 2,” Zool. Zh. 71(8), 50–58 (1992).
Radchenko, A.G. and Elmes, G.W., “Taxonomic Notes on the scabrinodis Group of Myrmica Species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) Living in Eastern Europe and Western Asia, with a Description of a New Species from Tien Shan,” Proc. Russ. Entomol. Soc. 75(1), 222–233 (2004).
Radchenko, A.G. and Malii, E.N., “A Zoogeographic Characteristic of the Ant Fauna of the Crimea,” in Ecology and Taxonomy of Ukrainian Insects (Vishcha Shkola, Odessa, 1990), pp. 105–113 [in Russian].
Reznikova, Zh.I., “Stable Structure of Multispecies Associations of Steppe Ants in Different Natural Zones,” in Problems of Zoogeography and History of Fauna (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1980), pp. 116–130 [in Russian].
Reznikova, Zh.I., Interspecific Interactions in Ants (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1983) [in Russian].
Reznikova, Zh.I., “A New Form of Interspecific Relations in Ants: The Interspecific Social Control Hypothesis,” Zool. Zh. 82(7), 816–824 (2003).
Reznikova, Zh.I. and Ivanov, S.P., “Species Diversity and Some Biocenotic Parameters of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Mountain Pastures of the Crimea,” Uchenye Zapiski Tavrich. Nats. Univ. Ser. Biol. 16(3), 215–222 (2003).
Sanders, N.J. and Gordon, D.M., “Resource-Dependent Interactions and the Organization of Desert Ant Communities,” Ecology 84(4), 1024–1031 (2003).
Seifert, B., Die Ameisen Mittel- und Nordeuropas (Lutra Verlags- und Vertriebsgesellschaft, Tauer, 2007).
Stukalyuk, S.V. and Radchenko, V.G., “Species Composition and Community Structure of Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) on the Coastal Lake Shores in the Northwestern Crimea,” Vestnik Zool. 42(4), 303–313 (2008).
Vantaux, A., Dejean, A., Dor, A., and Orivel, J., “Parasitism Versus Mutualism in the Ant-Garden Parabiosis between Camponotus femoratus and Crematogaster levior,” Insectes Soc. 54(1), 95–99 (2007).
Wilson, E.O., Success and Dominance in Ecosystems: the Case of the Social Insects (Ecology Inst., Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 1990).
Yanoviak, S.P. and Kaspari, M., “Community Structure and the Habitat Templet: Ants in the Tropical Forest Canopy and Litter,” OIKOS 89(2), 259–266 (2000).
Zakharov, A.A., Organization of Ant Communities (Nauka, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].