Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice

Buchanan, J. M. (1975).The limits of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Buchanan, J. M. (1979).What should economists do? Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

Buchanan, J. M., and Tullock, G. (1962).The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Cohen, L. (1979). Cyclic sets in multidimensional voting models.Journal of Economic Theory 20: 1?12.

Cohen, L., and Matthews, S. (1980). Constrained Plott equilibria, directional equilibria, and global cycling sets.Review of Economic Studies 47: 975?986.

Fiorina, M. P. (1980). Legislative facilitation of government growth: Universalism and reciprocity practices in majority rule institutions.Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management 1: forthcoming.

Isaac, R. M., and Plott, C. R. (1978). Cooperative game models of the influence of the closed rule in three person majority rule committees: Theory and experiments. In P. C. Ordeshook (Ed.),Game theory and political science. New York: New York University Press. 283?322.

Kadane, J. B. (1972). On division of the question.Public Choice 13: 47?55.

Kramer, G. H. (1973). On a class of equilibrium conditions for majority rule.Econometrica 41: 285?297.

McKelvey, R. D. (1976). Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control.Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472?482.

McKelvey, R. D. (1977). Constructing majority paths between arbitrary points. Paper delivered at American Economic Association Meetings. New York.

McKelvey, R. D. (1979). General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models.Econometrica 47: 1085?1111.

McKelvey, R. D., and Wendell, R. E. (1976). Voting equilibria in multidimensional choice spaces.Mathematics of Operations Research 1: 144?158.

Miller, G. J. (1979). Experimental results in two-party agenda setting: What's it worth to be a party? Working paper. Michigan State University.

Plott, C. R. (1967). A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule.American Economic Review 57: 787?806.

Plott, C. R. (1972). Individual choice of a political-economic process. In R. G. Niemi and H. F. Weisberg (Eds.),Probability models of collective decision making. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co. 83?101.

Plott, C. R., and Levine, M. E. (1978). A model of agenda influence on committee decisions.American Economic Review 68: 146?160.

Posner, R. A. (1977).Economic analysis of law. 2nd Edition. Boston: Little-Brown.

Riker, W. H. (1979). The verification of scientific generalizations by historical case studies: The genesis of the American Constitution. Presented at Meeting of Social Science History Association. Cambridge, Mass.

Riker, W. H. (1980). Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions.American Political Science Review 74: 432?447.

Romer, T., and Rosenthal, H. (1978). Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo.Public Choice 33: 27?45.

Schofield, N. (1978). Instability of simple dynamic games.Review of Economic Studies 45: 575?594.

Schofield, N. (1980). Formal political theory.Quality and Quantity 14: 249?275.

Shepsle, K. A. (1979a). Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models.American Journal of Political Science 23: 27?59.

Shepsle, K. A. (1979b). The role of institutional structure in the creation of policy equilibrium. In D. W. Rae and T. J. Eismeier (Eds.),Public choice and public policy. Beverly Hills: Sage. 249?283.

Shepsle, K. A., and Weingast, B. R. (1980). Political solutions to market problems: The political incidence of economic benefits and costs. Delivered at Meetings of Public Choice Society. San Francisco.

Shepsle, K. A., and Weingast, B. R. (1981). Political preferences for the pork barrel: A generalization.American Journal of Political Science 25: 96?112.

Sloss, J. (1973). Stable outcomes in majority rule voting games.Public Choice 15: 19?48.

Slutsky, S. M. (1977). A voting model for the allocation of public goods: Existence of an equilibrium.Journal of Economic Theory 14: 299?325.

Tullock, G. (1967). The general irrelevance of the general impossibility theorem.Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1967, p. 256. Reprinted inTowards a mathematics of politics, 1967, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, p. 37.

Tullock, G. (1981). Why so much stability?Public Choice 37: 189?202.

Weingast, B. R. (1979). A rational choice perspective on Congressional norms.American Journal of Political Science 24: 245?263.

Weingast, B. R. (1981). Regulation, reregulation, and deregulation: The political foundations of agency-clientele relationships.Law and Contemporary Problems 44: 147?177.